| Course | PJM-5400 Procurement and Vendor Management |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Module 2 written assignment: contracting principles and methods |
| Length | About 555 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | M.S. in Management in Project Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PJM 5400 Module 2
Three Purchases, Three Contract Types: Matching Risk to Pricing in a Smart Meter Program
Student Name
M.S. in Management in Project Management, Thomas Edison State University
PJM-5400: Procurement and Vendor Management
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Three Purchases, Three Contract Types: Matching Risk to Pricing in a Smart Meter Program
Elements of a Valid Contract
Garrett (2010) lists the elements of a binding contract: an offer, acceptance of that offer, consideration exchanged between the parties, parties with legal capacity to contract and a lawful purpose. For a public utility, authority also matters: only officials authorized by the board can bind the utility, so the RFP will name the contracting officer and state that no other employee may commit the utility.
Goods and Services
The program combines goods and services. Sales of goods, such as meters and radio equipment, fall under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, whose default rules fill gaps, on warranties and delivery for example, wherever the contract says nothing. Installation and billing integration are services, governed by common law. Separating the purchases, or stating clearly which rules apply to each part, avoids disputes about which law controls. Public buyers must also justify contract choices to boards and the public, a constraint Schapper et al. (2006) place at the center of public procurement management.
Contract Types and Risk
Garrett describes a spectrum of contract types. At one end, firm-fixed-price contracts place cost risk on the seller; at the other, cost-reimbursement contracts place it on the buyer. Time-and-materials contracts pay for hours and materials as used. Bajari and Tadelis (2001) showed that fixed-price contracts give strong incentives to control cost but become costly to change, while cost-plus contracts adapt easily but weaken incentives, so the right choice depends on how complete and stable the design is.
| Purchase | Uncertainty | Contract type | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meters and network equipment | Low in design; moderate in component prices | Fixed price with economic price adjustment | Specifications are standard, but electronic component prices have swung sharply; an adjustment tied to a published index shares that risk fairly |
| Installation of 48,000 meters | Moderate: access, basement conditions, customer scheduling | Fixed unit price per meter, with an incentive for on-time completion | Unit pricing handles volume; the incentive rewards meeting the schedule |
| Billing system integration | High: our billing system is old and poorly documented | Time and materials with a not-to-exceed ceiling | Scope cannot be defined precisely; the ceiling protects the utility |
Why Not One Contract Type
A single firm-fixed-price contract for everything would push all risk onto the vendor, which would price in large contingencies for the billing integration and installation surprises, raising the total cost. A single cost-reimbursement contract would leave the utility exposed on meters, where prices can be fixed. Matching type to risk lets each risk sit where it can best be managed.
Protections in Each Type
The economic price adjustment will be limited to plus or minus 10 percent and tied to a published producer price index for electronic components. The installation contract will define what counts as a difficult access case, such as a meter behind a finished wall, with a separate unit price, so the installer is not forced to absorb unforeseen work. The integration ceiling will be set at $650,000, with work authorized in monthly task orders.
Conclusion
A valid contract needs offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity and a lawful purpose, plus authority on the utility's side. Choosing a different contract type for meters, installation and integration places each risk with the party best able to manage it, which should lower bids and reduce disputes.
References
Bajari, P., & Tadelis, S. (2001). Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(3), 387-407. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696361
Garrett, G. A. (2010). World class contracting (5th ed.). CCH.
Schapper, P. R., Veiga Malta, J. N., & Gilbert, D. L. (2006). An analytical framework for the management and reform of public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 6(1/2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-01-02-2006-B001
PJM 5400 Module 2 instructions, in plain terms
This written assignment covers contracting principles and methods, and Part 1 of the course project, the Instructions to Bidders section of an RFP, is due at the end of this module. You will set out what makes a contract valid, which law governs goods and which services, and the spectrum of contract types, then pick a type for each part of a purchase and defend it by its risks. Show how each type shifts cost risk between buyer and seller, and add protections that make the choice work. Treat each part of a mixed procurement separately if its risks differ, and explain which law governs goods and which governs services. Use a table to set each purchase beside its contract type.
How the PJM 5400 Module 2 example is put together
The paper lists the elements of a valid contract and adds the question of authority for a public buyer. A section distinguishes goods under the Uniform Commercial Code from services. A section explains the spectrum of contract types with research on incentives and flexibility, and a table assigns a type to each of three purchases with reasons. Sections explain why one type would not fit and the protections built into each. Protections are spelled out for each contract type: limits on price adjustment, a defined difficult-access category and a not-to-exceed ceiling for integration work. A section explains why a single contract type for the whole program would raise cost or exposure. Each contract type is tied to the uncertainty in its purchase.
PJM 5400 Module 2 rubric: what earns full marks
The grade reflects accurate explanation of contract principles, sound reasoning about contract types and risk, and specific application. Papers that match contract type to the uncertainty of each purchase show command of the module. Distinguishing goods from services, and noting authority to contract, demonstrates legal awareness. Protections such as indexes, defined exceptions and ceilings show practical skill. Specific protections, tied to each contract type, show that the choice has been thought through to the clauses that make it work. Explaining why one type would not fit the whole program shows the reasoning behind the choice. Noting who may legally bind the utility shows awareness of public authority.
Common PJM 5400 Module 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Students lose points by choosing one contract type without considering risk, by confusing time and materials with cost-plus or by ignoring the law that governs goods. Others list contract elements without applying them. Match contract type to uncertainty. Explain who bears cost risk under each. Add protections. Note which law governs each purchase. Write the protections that make each contract type safe, such as indexes, defined exceptions and ceilings. Remember that the right type for one purchase can be wrong for another in the same program. A free first sample on your own PJM-5400 contracting assignment is available on request.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More PJM 5400 and M.S. in Management in Project Management sample papers
- PJM 5400 Module 1: Written Assignment: The Procurement Team and Trust for a Smart Meter Program
- PJM 5400 Module 3: Written Assignment: The RFP, Evaluation Criteria and a Best Value Source Selection Plan
- PJM 5400 Module 4: Written Assignment: Price Analysis and a Fixed-Price Incentive for Installation
- PJM 5400 Module 5: Written Assignment: Negotiating the Award and Debriefing the Losing Bidders
- PJM 5400 Module 6: Written Assignment: Administering the Smart Meter Contract Through Closeout
- PJM 5200 Module 3: Written Assignment: Monitoring, a Slipping Milestone and a Clean Closure
- PJM 5300 Module 4: Written Assignment: Expected Monetary Value, a Decision Tree and the Contingency Reserve
- PJM 6400 Module 3: Case Analysis: A Global Matrix and the Two-Boss Problem
PJM 5400 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free PJM 5400 Module 2 sample paper?
Contract types chosen for meters, installation and integration in a smart meter program are in the assignment above.
What are the elements of a valid contract?
An offer and its acceptance, an exchange of value, parties able to contract and a legal purpose.
What law governs the sale of goods?
Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, while services fall under common law.
When is a fixed-price contract appropriate?
When requirements are well defined and stable, so the seller can price the risk.
What is an economic price adjustment?
A clause that adjusts a fixed price for changes in a published index, sharing the risk of market price swings.