MAN 3310 Module 10 Final Project Case Analysis Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This MAN 3310 Module 10 example is the Human Resources Management final project, a case analysis worth 20% of the course grade, examining an invented 11-store South Jersey grocery chain with high turnover, injuries and flat service scores. It was written for TESU's B.S.B.A. in Human Resources/Organizational Management, where the final module looks at human resources as a profession. The case analysis states the central problem, links the course's separate topics into one causal chain with meta-analytic evidence on when turnover hurts most, weighs three alternatives, recommends a phased eighteen-month plan with costs and describes the HR department's own shift to a strategic role. The catalog lists MAN-3310.

CourseMAN-3310 Human Resources Management
ModuleModule 10
Paper typeFinal project: human resources case analysis
LengthAbout 1,063 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramB.S.B.A. in Human Resources/Organizational Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MAN 3310 Module 10

1

Case Analysis: Turning Tuckahoe Markets' Turnover Into a Service Advantage

Student Name

B.S.B.A. in Human Resources/Organizational Management, Thomas Edison State University

MAN-3310: Human Resources Management

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingA case analysis title names the organization and the central issue. The organization is a composite built for this course's assignments.
2

Case Analysis: Turning Tuckahoe Markets' Turnover Into a Service Advantage

Case Summary

The chain in this case, Tuckahoe Markets, is an invented family business running eleven grocery stores between Trenton and Cape May with roughly 2,100 workers, most of them part-time. It competes against national chains, warehouse clubs and a fast-growing discount grocer. Over the past year it experienced turnover of about 70% among hourly clerks and roughly half of new fresh-department hires leaving within 90 days, 61 recordable injuries, flat customer satisfaction scores and rising labor costs as self-checkout and online ordering changed the work. The owners have asked the HR director for an analysis and a plan. This case analysis identifies the central problem, analyzes its causes using concepts from the course, weighs alternatives and recommends an integrated plan, with attention in the final module to the HR function's own role as a profession (Jackson et al., 2017).

Problem Statement

The chain's central problem is not turnover alone but an HR system that produces high turnover in exactly the jobs where experience creates value for customers. Its strategy depends on service in fresh departments and reliable stores, yet its practices, from generic recruiting and unstructured interviews to unpredictable schedules, minimal training, flat pay and a speed-first safety climate, push experienced people out.

Analysis

Turnover's cost depends on where it occurs. Hancock et al. (2013) combined 48 samples and found that the average correlation between collective turnover and organizational performance was small, about minus .03, but that the relationship was stronger when performance was measured as customer service or quality and safety, and that effects on these operational outcomes carried through to financial results. That pattern fits Tuckahoe: turnover among stockers on the night shift may cost little, but turnover at the deli and seafood counters, and among department managers, erodes the service and safety outcomes the research identifies as most sensitive.

Earlier analyses in this course located the causes. Recruiting and selection give applicants an unrealistically pleasant picture of fresh-department work and rely on unstructured interviews, so many hires leave early. Scheduling is unpredictable, and a randomized experiment at a national apparel retailer found that more stable schedules raised store productivity (Kesavan et al., 2022). Training consists of shadowing, and department managers, promoted for technical skill, are not prepared to coach or schedule fairly. Pay rises little with tenure, so staying is not rewarded. And the safety climate signals that speed matters more than safety, producing injuries and, in one case, a child labor violation. Each weakness reinforces the others: untrained managers build poor schedules, poor schedules drive turnover, turnover leaves counters staffed by new hires and new hires get hurt more often.

What this page is doingThe analysis connects the course's separate topics into one causal chain. A final case analysis is judged on that integration, not on how many concepts it mentions.
3

Alternatives

Three alternatives are realistic. The first is an across-the-board pay increase of a dollar an hour. It is simple and visible, but at about $1.7 million a year it costs more than the turnover it would prevent, and it does not address scheduling, training or safety. The second is to accept high turnover and redesign work so that it matters less, for example by simplifying fresh-department tasks and relying more on prepackaged products. That would lower costs but abandon the service advantage the chain needs against discounters. The third is an integrated redesign of the HR system around the fresh departments and department managers, the jobs where experience matters most, combining targeted changes in recruiting, scheduling, training, pay and safety.

Recommendation

The chain should adopt the third alternative, phased over eighteen months and tested before full rollout. In the first six months, it should complete the child labor audit, introduce realistic job previews and structured interviews for fresh departments, post schedules two weeks ahead with a core of consistent shifts and launch the training program for new department managers. In months seven to twelve, it should add pay steps at 90 days, one year and two years, a fresh-department certification premium and a quarterly team bonus tied to customer scores and shrink, along with daily safety huddles and safer equipment. In months thirteen to eighteen, it should evaluate results in pilot stores against comparison stores and extend what works to all eleven stores.

The combined first-year cost is about $950,000, covering pay steps and the bonus, training time, equipment and recruiting changes. If 90-day retention in fresh departments rises from half to two thirds, overall clerk turnover falls by a fifth and injuries fall by a third, the savings in recruiting, training, workers' compensation and lost time would cover most of the cost, with the larger benefit coming from better service in the departments that set the chain apart.

The HR Function as a Profession

Carrying out this plan also changes the HR department's role. Today HR at Tuckahoe processes paperwork, runs payroll and handles complaints. The plan requires it to act as a strategic partner: analyzing data on turnover and injuries by store and department, designing selection and training systems, advising managers and measuring results. The textbook describes the shift of HR professionals from administrative specialists toward partners who contribute to strategy and change (Jackson et al., 2017). For the HR director, that means building analytical skills, perhaps with a part-time HR analyst, earning credibility with store managers by solving their staffing problems and holding the department to the same ethical standards it asks of others, especially in fair hiring and the treatment of young workers.

Implementation Risks and Measures

The main risks are manager resistance to structured interviews and schedule rules, costs rising faster than savings and the pilot's results being too noisy to interpret. The plan addresses them by involving department managers in designing interview questions, reviewing costs quarterly and running the pilot long enough, twelve months, to see seasonal patterns. Progress will be tracked with five measures reported monthly by store: 90-day retention of new hires, annual turnover by department, customer satisfaction scores for fresh departments, recordable injuries and labor cost as a share of sales.

Conclusion

Tuckahoe Markets' problems are connected, and so are their solutions. An HR system designed around the jobs where experience creates value, with honest recruiting, structured selection, stable schedules, trained managers, pay that rewards staying and a genuine safety climate, offers the chain a way to compete on what discounters cannot easily copy. Testing it in pilot stores and measuring results protects the owners' investment while the HR department grows into the strategic role the plan requires.

References

Hancock, J. I., Allen, D. G., Bosco, F. A., McDaniel, K. R., & Pierce, C. A. (2013). Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. Journal of Management, 39(3), 573-603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311424943

Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S., & Werner, S. (2017). Managing human resources (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Kesavan, S., Lambert, S. J., Williams, J. C., & Pendem, P. K. (2022). Doing well by doing good: Improving retail store performance with responsible scheduling practices at the Gap, Inc. Management Science, 68(11), 7818-7836. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4291

What the MAN 3310 Module 10 instructions ask for

According to the syllabus, the MAN-3310 final project is a case analysis submitted at the end of the term and worth 20% of the course grade; the course's Final Project section gives the case and required elements, and some study assignments point to textbook chapters for specific questions. A strong case analysis usually summarizes the case, defines the central problem, analyzes causes with course concepts, compares alternatives, recommends a plan and addresses implementation. Module 10 adds the perspective of HR as a profession, so consider what the plan asks of the HR function itself. Write professionally and cite consistently in one style. Read the full case twice before outlining, noting every question the directions ask.

How this MAN 3310 Module 10 example is built

The case analysis follows the classic structure: summary, problem statement, analysis, alternatives, recommendation and implementation, so a mentor can find each element. The problem statement names one central issue rather than a list. The analysis uses a meta-analysis on turnover and performance to explain why turnover in certain jobs matters most, then connects causes from every earlier module into one chain. Three alternatives are compared on cost and fit with strategy. The recommendation is phased with costs and expected savings, a section addresses the HR function's role as the final module asks, and risks and five monthly measures close the case. Every recommendation can be traced to a cause named in the analysis.

Reading the MAN 3310 Module 10 grading rubric

Mentors grade the final case analysis on how clearly the problem is defined, how well course concepts explain its causes, how fairly alternatives are weighed and how realistic and specific the recommendation is. Integration across modules matters more than the number of concepts mentioned, and evidence should support the key claims. Implementation details, costs and measures show that the plan could be carried out. Because the project counts for a fifth of the grade, professional presentation, accurate citations and careful proofreading carry real weight, and the case's specific questions must all be answered. A plan with priorities, a timeline and costs is judged more realistic than a list of ideas.

MAN 3310 Module 10 help from the desk

A common imbalance in case analyses is a long retelling of the facts and a thin analysis. Keep the summary short. Another common weakness is listing every problem without identifying which one is central. Students also recommend everything at once with no priorities, costs or timeline; phase the plan and price it. Consider alternatives honestly, including ones you reject, and explain why. Address implementation risks, such as manager resistance. Answer every question in the Final Project directions explicitly. Our writers can prepare a MAN 3310 final case analysis based on the case your course assigns, following its required elements. Reread the Final Project directions at the end to confirm every required element is present.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More MAN 3310 and B.S.B.A. in Human Resources/Organizational Management sample papers

MAN 3310 Module 10 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MAN 3310 Module 10 sample paper?

The MAN-3310 final case analysis is shown above in full: problem statement, integrated analysis, three alternatives, a phased plan with costs, the HR function's role, risks and measures, with sources and notes.

What form does the MAN-3310 final project take?

The syllabus describes it as a case analysis submitted at the end of the semester, worth 20% of the final grade.

Does employee turnover always hurt performance?

A meta-analysis found the average relationship was small, but stronger when performance was measured as customer service or quality and safety.

What should a case analysis include?

A short summary, a clear problem statement, analysis of causes using course concepts, alternatives, a recommendation and an implementation plan with measures.

What does Module 10 add to the course?

It examines human resources as a profession, including how HR professionals move from administrative work toward strategic partnership.