| Course | MAN-3110 Organizational Behavior |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Self-awareness exercise: individuals in organizations |
| Length | About 874 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | B.S.B.A. in Human Resources/Organizational Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MAN 3110 Module 2
Smiling Through the Late Seating: Emotional Labor, Stress and Job Resources in Front-of-House Theater Work
Student Name
B.S.B.A. in Human Resources/Organizational Management, Thomas Edison State University
MAN-3110: Organizational Behavior
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Smiling Through the Late Seating: Emotional Labor, Stress and Job Resources in Front-of-House Theater Work
I am the house manager at the Raritan Stage Company, the theater I described in my Module 1 exercise. I supervise eight part-time ushers and box office staff, manage seating and patron complaints at every performance and serve as the person audiences see when anything goes wrong. Module 2 examines individuals in organizations, including personality, attitudes, emotions and stress (George & Jones, 2012). This exercise looks at three of those concepts in my own work.
Emotional Labor in My Job
Much of my job is managing my own emotions so that patrons have a good evening. When a subscriber arrives twenty minutes late and insists on being seated during a quiet scene, I must stay calm, sympathetic and firm, even when I am frustrated. Grandey (2000) described emotional labor as the process of regulating feelings and their expression to meet organizational goals, and distinguished two strategies. Surface acting means displaying an emotion one does not feel, such as a smile over irritation. Deep acting means changing one's own feelings, for example by reframing the situation, so that the displayed emotion is genuine. She linked surface acting in particular to stress and exhaustion.
Looking honestly at my own habits, I surface act more than I deep act, especially late in long weeks. I smile and apologize while silently counting the minutes until intermission. When I manage to reframe, reminding myself that the late subscriber has probably been stuck on Route 18 and has supported the theater for twenty years, the conversation goes better and I feel less drained afterward. The difference is noticeable: on nights when I mostly surface act, I go home exhausted even if nothing went wrong.
I also notice a pattern in which patrons trigger surface acting. Complaints delivered with contempt, rather than frustration, make deep acting much harder for me, and those are the encounters after which I most need a break. Knowing that helps me plan: on nights with a sold-out house and a strict late-seating policy, I now station an experienced usher at the door so that I am not handling every difficult arrival alone.
Stress During Opening Week
The most stressful period in my year is the week a production opens. Final dress rehearsals, an invited preview, press night and the first public performances all fall within six days, and my staff work long evenings with patrons who expect perfection. The job demands-resources model helps explain why some opening weeks wear me down and others do not. Bakker and Demerouti (2007) summarized research showing that job demands, such as workload, time pressure and emotional demands, lead mainly to strain and exhaustion, while job resources, such as support, autonomy, feedback and opportunities to develop, lead mainly to engagement, and that resources can buffer the effect of high demands.
My opening weeks fit this pattern. Last fall, during a production with a complicated late-seating policy and a sold-out run, demands were high, but the stage manager briefed me daily, the managing director backed my decisions with difficult patrons and two experienced ushers handled the lobby without supervision. I was tired but engaged. In the spring, with similar demands, one usher quit, the late-seating policy changed twice without explanation and I could not reach anyone when a patron fell ill. The demands were no higher, but the resources were missing, and by Sunday I was exhausted and short with my own staff.
Personality plays a part too. I am conscientious and like to control details, which makes changing policies especially stressful for me; a colleague who is more relaxed about details found the spring production much less taxing. The demands were the same for both of us, but our responses differed.
What I Will Change
This exercise suggests three changes. First, I will practice deep acting deliberately: before each performance I will remind myself why patrons may arrive stressed and what they have given the theater, and after difficult encounters I will take two minutes away from the lobby rather than going straight to the next patron. Second, I will protect my resources during opening weeks by asking for a standing ten-minute briefing with the stage manager and a written late-seating policy agreed before the first preview, and by scheduling my most experienced ushers for opening week rather than distributing them evenly. Third, I will extend the same resources to my staff: clear policies, a quick debrief after any difficult patron interaction and recognition at the end of each run.
Those changes are small, but the research suggests they target the right mechanisms: reducing reliance on surface acting, and increasing the resources that keep high demands from turning into exhaustion. I will judge their effect by how I feel at the end of the next opening week and by whether my ushers stay for the full season.
Conclusion
Examining my own work through these concepts changed how I see it. Fatigue after a long run is not simply a matter of working too many hours; it depends on how I manage emotions in front of patrons and on whether the organization gives me the support to meet high demands. Both are within reach of practical change.
References
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Understanding and managing organizational behavior (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95
MAN 3110 Module 2 instructions, in plain terms
Self-awareness exercises in MAN-3110 have you hold one or more chapter ideas up against what you have actually lived, as the syllabus describes; the module page gives the specific prompt. Module 2 covers individuals in organizations, so expect a prompt about personality, values, attitudes, perception, emotions, stress or motivation as they apply to you. Write in the first person, use specific episodes from your work or school life rather than general impressions, and connect each observation to a concept from the George and Jones text or research. The usual heading details belong at the top of the first page. Choose episodes you remember clearly, since vague recollections make weak evidence.
Inside the MAN 3110 Module 2 example
The exercise introduces the writer's role and links it to the earlier module so the organization is already familiar. Each of its main sections takes one concept, defines it from a primary source and then examines the writer's own behavior against it, with concrete episodes such as a late-arriving subscriber and two different opening weeks. The comparison of two weeks with similar demands but different support shows the job demands-resources model at work. The final section turns insight into three specific changes for the writer and her staff, with a way to judge whether they work. Two contrasting opening weeks act as a natural experiment for the stress model.
MAN 3110 Module 2 rubric: what earns full marks
Mentors grade self-awareness exercises on how thoughtfully you connect course concepts to your own experience, how accurately you use the concepts, and how well developed the reflection is. Specific episodes and honest self-assessment earn more credit than general statements about being a good team player. Applying a concept correctly, for example distinguishing surface from deep acting, shows understanding of the readings. Ending with practical changes demonstrates that the reflection had a purpose. Clear organization, correct grammar and cited sources complete the grade, along with the identifying information the syllabus requires. Mentors also value a closing plan that the writer could actually carry out. Specific dates, events or numbers make the reflection credible.
Common MAN 3110 Module 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Students sometimes treat a self-awareness exercise as a diary entry with no course concepts, or as a summary of the chapter with no personal content. Aim for both: a concept, then your experience examined through it. Avoid presenting only strengths; real self-awareness includes patterns you would like to change. Keep episodes specific, such as one shift or one conversation. Protect others' privacy by describing roles rather than names. If you have little work experience, school, volunteer or family roles can serve. Our writers can help shape a MAN 3110 self-awareness exercise around your own experiences and the concepts in your module. Re-read your draft and ask whether a stranger would learn something specific about how you work.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More MAN 3110 and B.S.B.A. in Human Resources/Organizational Management sample papers
- MAN 3110 Module 1: Organizational Behavior Written Exercise
- MAN 3110 Module 3: Group Processes Application Activity
- MAN 3110 Module 4: Leadership Written Exercise
- MAN 3110 Module 5: Capstone Paper
- MAN 3310 Module 1: HR Competitive Edge Assignment
- MAN 4250 Module 2: Written Assignment: The Deeper Assumptions About Truth, Time and People
- PSY 3630 Module 1: Job Analysis Paper: Defining the Member Service Representative Role
MAN 3110 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MAN 3110 Module 2 sample paper?
The complete self-awareness exercise is shown above: emotional labor, opening-week stress through the job demands-resources model and three planned changes, written by a composite theater house manager, with sources.
What is emotional labor?
The work of regulating one's feelings and their expression to meet an organization's expectations, such as staying pleasant with difficult customers.
What is the difference between surface acting and deep acting?
Surface acting displays an emotion one does not feel; deep acting changes one's actual feelings. Surface acting has been linked more strongly to stress and exhaustion.
What does the job demands-resources model say?
Job demands mainly drive strain and exhaustion, job resources mainly drive engagement, and resources can buffer the effect of high demands.
Should a self-awareness exercise be written in the first person?
Yes. Because the exercise is about your own experience, I and specific episodes are expected.