BUS 2100 Module 4 Control Charts and a Seasonal Forecast Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This BUS 2100 Module 4 sample paper is the fourth module project for Quantitative Skills for Business, on quality management, quality control and forecasting. It belongs to TESU's Bachelor of Science in Business Administration (BSBA) and uses a composite bakery's data. Eight samples of 800-gram loaves give x-bar chart limits of 798.0 to 805.2 grams; one sample at 810.8 grams traces to a miscalibrated scale, and revised limits run from 796.6 to 803.9 grams. Three years of quarterly sales then yield seasonal indices from 0.910 to 1.124 and a trend of about 4,640 loaves a quarter, forecasting about 2.03 million loaves next year. BUS-2100 is the course code.

CourseBUS-2100 Quantitative Skills for Business
ModuleModule 4
Paper typeModule project 4: quality management, quality control and forecasting
LengthAbout 830 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramBachelor of Science in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUS 2100 Module 4

1

Heavy Loaves and Holiday Peaks: Control Charts and a Seasonal Forecast for a Bakery

Student Name

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Thomas Edison State University

BUS-2100: Quantitative Skills for Business

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the quality problem and the seasonal pattern the project analyzes. The bakery and its data are a composite.
2

Heavy Loaves and Holiday Peaks: Control Charts and a Seasonal Forecast for a Bakery

The Situation

A composite regional bakery in Wisconsin packs whole-wheat loaves labeled 800 grams. Underweight loaves risk complaints and regulatory trouble, while overweight loaves give away dough and raise costs. The operations manager also needs a quarterly sales forecast to plan flour purchases and staffing for the coming year. Wisniewski and Shafti (2020) treat quality control and forecasting together because both use past data to manage future operations, and both are covered in this module.

Part 1: Control Charts for Loaf Weight

Eight samples of five loaves were weighed over two days. For each sample, the mean and the range, the heaviest minus the lightest loaf, were calculated.

SampleWeights (g)Mean (g)Range (g)
1801, 798, 803, 799, 800800.25
2797, 802, 800, 804, 798800.27
3803, 799, 801, 797, 802800.46
4800, 805, 798, 801, 799800.67
5796, 801, 799, 803, 800799.87
6812, 809, 814, 808, 811810.86
7799, 802, 800, 798, 803800.45
8801, 797, 804, 800, 799800.27

The grand mean of the sample means is 801.6 grams and the average range is 6.25 grams. For samples of five, the standard control chart factors are A2 = 0.577 for the means chart and D3 = 0 and D4 = 2.114 for the range chart (Montgomery, 2019). The means chart limits are therefore 801.6 plus or minus 0.577 x 6.25, or 798.0 to 805.2 grams, and the range chart's upper limit is 2.114 x 6.25, about 13.2 grams.

Every range falls within its limit, so the variation within samples is stable. Sample 6, however, has a mean of 810.8 grams, well above the upper limit. Investigation found that the divider's scale had been recalibrated incorrectly after cleaning that morning. Because the cause was found and corrected, sample 6 is removed and the limits recalculated from the remaining seven samples: a center line of 800.3 grams, limits of 796.6 to 803.9 grams, and a range limit of about 13.3 grams. The revised chart becomes the standard for routine monitoring, with a sample taken every two hours. Shewhart's idea of separating ordinary variation from variation with an assignable cause is exactly what the chart did here: it flagged a real problem that a glance at individual loaves might have missed.

Part 2: A Seasonal Forecast

Quarterly sales over three years, in thousands of loaves, show growth and a clear seasonal pattern, with the fourth quarter highest because of holiday demand.

YearQ1Q2Q3Q4Total
14104554305051,800
24284764495301,883
34474974705521,966
Seasonal index0.9101.0110.9551.1244.000

Each seasonal index is the average, across the three years, of that quarter's sales divided by the year's quarterly mean, adjusted so the four indices sum to four. Dividing each quarter's sales by its index removes the seasonal pattern; a straight line fitted to the twelve deseasonalized values gives about 440.6 plus 4.64 per quarter, in thousands. Multiplying the trend projection for each quarter of year four by its seasonal index gives the forecast: about 456,000 loaves in the first quarter, 511,000 in the second, 487,000 in the third and 579,000 in the fourth, a total of about 2.03 million loaves, 3.4 percent above year three.

Applied to the three years of history, the model's fitted values have a mean absolute deviation of about 4,700 loaves and a mean absolute percentage error of about 1.0 percent. That fit is optimistic, since the model was estimated from the same data, so the bakery should compare the forecast with actual results each quarter. Hyndman and Athanasopoulos (2021) recommend judging forecasting methods on data not used to fit them for this reason.

Decisions

The bakery should adopt the revised control chart for loaf weight, add a scale check to the cleaning procedure and train line staff to stop and investigate whenever a sample mean falls outside the limits. For planning, it should order flour and schedule seasonal staff to the quarterly forecast, with the fourth quarter about 12 percent above an average quarter, and update the indices and trend each year.

Using the Tools Together

The two tools support each other. If loaf weights drift upward and go unnoticed, the bakery gives away dough on every loaf, and at the fourth-quarter forecast of about 579,000 loaves, 11 extra grams per loaf would amount to more than six metric tons of dough in a single quarter. Monitoring weight with the control chart therefore matters most in exactly the quarters the forecast says will be busiest.

Conclusion

The control chart caught an assignable cause that was giving away about 11 grams of dough per loaf, and the seasonal model gives a forecast precise enough for purchasing and staffing. Both tools turn routine data into decisions, which is the purpose of this module.

References

Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). OTexts.

Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Introduction to statistical quality control (8th ed.). Wiley.

Wisniewski, M., & Shafti, F. (2020). Quantitative analysis for decision makers (7th ed.). Pearson.

BUS 2100 Module 4 instructions, in plain terms

The fourth BUS-2100 module project draws on Module 4 and comes before the second proctored exam. Expect data on a process to monitor and a time series to forecast. For control charts, calculate sample means and ranges, use the correct factors for the sample size, plot the limits and investigate any point outside them before revising. For forecasting, identify trend and seasonality, calculate seasonal indices, deseasonalize, fit a trend and reseasonalize the projection. Report an error measure and explain its limits. Present the data and results in tables or charts a manager can read, and finish with the decisions the analysis supports. Keep the units on every figure, grams or loaves, so the results stay clear.

How this BUS 2100 Module 4 example is built

The project handles two tools in two parts, each starting with the data in a table. The control chart section shows the formulas with the actual numbers, identifies the out-of-control sample, reports the cause and recalculates the limits, which is the correct sequence. The forecasting section explains how seasonal indices are built and used, gives the forecast quarter by quarter, and reports error measures with a caution that in-sample fit flatters a model. A decisions section turns both analyses into actions for the bakery. The conclusion quantifies what the control chart caught and why the forecast is useful. Read it for the sequence each tool requires. Note the order.

BUS 2100 Module 4 rubric: what earns full marks

Mentors grade the fourth project out of 100. They check control chart calculations, including correct factors for the sample size, the treatment of out-of-control points and whether limits are revised only after a cause is found. In forecasting they look for correct seasonal indices, deseasonalizing, trend fitting and reseasonalizing, plus an error measure with an honest interpretation. Clear tables or charts, units on every figure and a practical decisions section finish the paper. Papers that remove an outlier without explaining it, or that forecast without testing accuracy, tend to lose points. Explaining the cause of any signal, not just flagging it, earns credit. Clarity helps. Units matter.

BUS 2100 Module 4 help from the desk

Common mistakes include using the wrong control chart factors for the sample size, removing out-of-control points without finding a cause, and treating a seasonal pattern as a trend. Our writers can prepare BUS 2100 quality and forecasting projects with your module's data. For control charts, compute each sample's mean and range, then the grand mean, average range and limits, and investigate any signal. For forecasts, plot the series first to see trend and seasonality, then build indices, fit a trend to the deseasonalized data and project it forward. Report an error measure along with its limits. Then compare the forecast with actual results each quarter. Check units too.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More BUS 2100 and Bachelor of Science in Business Administration sample papers

BUS 2100 Module 4 questions, answered

Where can I find a free BUS 2100 Module 4 sample paper?

The fourth Quantitative Skills for Business module project appears above, with x-bar and R charts for a bakery's loaf weights and a seasonal forecast of quarterly sales.

What are the control chart factors for samples of five?

A2 = 0.577 for the means chart, and D3 = 0 and D4 = 2.114 for the range chart.

When should control limits be recalculated?

After an out-of-control point has been investigated and its assignable cause found and corrected, the point can be removed and the limits recalculated.

What is a seasonal index?

A ratio showing how a period's typical value compares with the average period; values above 1 indicate higher-than-average seasons.

Why test a forecast on new data?

Error measured on the data that fitted the model is usually optimistic, so comparing forecasts with later actual results gives a fairer test.