BFO 7010 Module 5 Written Assignment: Classical Decomposition of a Seasonal Series Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This BFO 7010 Module 5 example answers the written assignment on time series decomposition for Business Forecasting in TESU's MBA in Data Analytics. BFO-7010 uses the module to pull a series apart before modeling it, so a forecaster can see how much of the movement is season, how much is trend and how much is noise. It splits the dealer's monthly gallons into trend, season and remainder. It applies a classical additive decomposition to 2019 to 2023, reads the twelve seasonal indices, explains a large remainder, compares additive with multiplicative indices and builds a 2024 forecast from the seasonally adjusted series, then sets that forecast beside the earlier benchmark and the weather regression.

CourseBFO-7010 Business Forecasting
ModuleModule 5
Paper typeModule 5 written assignment: decomposition of a monthly series
LengthAbout 881 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramMBA in Data Analytics
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BFO 7010 Module 5

1

Taking the Winter Out: Decomposing Five Years of Propane Deliveries

Student Name

MBA in Data Analytics, Thomas Edison State University

BFO-7010: Business Forecasting

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title describes seasonal adjustment in plain terms, removing the winter swing to see the trend underneath, for the composite series used throughout the course.
2

Taking the Winter Out: Decomposing Five Years of Propane Deliveries

Method

Classical decomposition treats each month's deliveries as the sum of three parts: a slowly moving trend-cycle, a seasonal effect that repeats every twelve months and a remainder. Because the period is even, the trend-cycle is estimated with a 2x12 moving average, which weights the twelve central months fully and the two ends by half so that every calendar month counts equally (Hyndman & Athanasopoulos, 2018). Subtracting that average from the data leaves the seasonal effect plus noise. Averaging those detrended values for each calendar month and then centering the twelve averages so they sum to zero gives the seasonal indices. What is left after removing trend and season is the remainder. The calculation used the 60 training months, January 2019 to December 2023, with 2024 held back as before.

Part A: Seasonal Indices

A typical January delivers about 246,000 gallons more than the trend level, and a typical August about 166,000 fewer. April is the hinge month, close to trend. The swing from August to January is roughly 413,000 gallons, larger than the average trend level of about 370,000, which is why every method that ignored the season failed so badly in Module 2.

The multiplicative indices express the same pattern as ratios: January runs at 166 percent of trend and August at 55 percent. The choice between the two forms depends on whether the seasonal swing grows as the business grows. Over these five years the trend rose only modestly, so the two forms give nearly the same seasonally adjusted series. If Pinelands added customers quickly, the winter peak would grow with them and the multiplicative form would fit better.

MonthAdditive index, thousands of gallonsMultiplicative index
January+246.31.661
February+178.91.480
March+115.31.307
April-14.20.963
May-106.00.718
June-153.60.592
July-162.30.561
August-166.40.550
September-146.10.608
October-51.30.864
November+73.71.197
December+185.81.500
What this page is doingReading the indices in gallons and as percentages, and saying when each form fits, turns the table into an argument about the business rather than a list of numbers.
3

Part B: Trend and Remainder

The 2x12 average climbs from about 349,000 gallons in mid-2019 to about 398,000 in mid-2024, a slow rise consistent with the 1,100 to 1,200 gallons a month found in the regressions of Module 4. The trend is not a straight line, however: it bulges in 2022, the coldest winter of the six years, with 4,945 heating degree days against about 4,700 in the others. A moving average cannot tell a cold year from business growth, so part of what it labels trend-cycle is weather.

The remainder has a standard deviation of about 22,900 gallons. Its largest value, -52,900 gallons, falls in December 2021, a month with 752 heating degree days against a normal of 860. The decomposition records that warm month as noise because it has no weather information, but a planner would recognize it as a cause. The strength-of-seasonality measure, one minus the variance of the remainder over the variance of season plus remainder, is about 0.98, so the seasonal component dominates; the corresponding trend strength is only about 0.50.

Part C: Forecasting From the Components

The seasonally adjusted series, the data minus the seasonal indices, ended 2023 at 392,400 gallons. Two forecasts were built by projecting that series and adding the seasonal indices back: a naive projection holding it flat and a drift projection extending its average monthly rise of 560 gallons.

The drift version cuts the benchmark's RMSE by about 30 percent, because it starts from a level that averages out one year's weather rather than copying last year whole. It still falls short of the weather regression, which knows why a month is high or low. The decomposition forecast is a useful middle step: cheap, transparent and easy to explain to the dispatch manager as "this year's trend plus the usual winter."

Method, 2024 test yearRMSEMAE2024 total, thousands of gallons
Seasonal naive benchmark, Module 238.3n/a4,689.6
Decomposition, naive on adjusted series28.826.44,708
Decomposition, drift on adjusted series26.924.94,752
Trend and heating degree days, Module 424.519.4n/a
Actual|4,799.3
What this page is doingSetting the decomposition forecast between the benchmark and the regression shows the student knows where the method sits, not only how to compute it.
4

Part D: Limits of Classical Decomposition

Classical decomposition has known weaknesses. The moving average loses six months at each end, so the most recent trend estimate, the one a forecaster needs most, is missing. It assumes the seasonal pattern is identical every year, and it lets single unusual months pull the indices. Statistical agencies have long refined the moving-average approach, and the X-12-ARIMA program, for example, extends the series with ARIMA forecasts so the ends are not lost (Findley et al., 1998). Cleveland et al. (1990) developed STL, a decomposition using locally weighted regression that lets the seasonal pattern change slowly and resists outliers; Hyndman and Athanasopoulos (2018) recommend it over the classical method for most work. For Pinelands, an STL fit would allow a winter peak that slowly flattens as customers install heat pumps, a change the classical indices would miss.

Conclusion

Decomposition shows that almost all of Pinelands' monthly variation is seasonal, that the trend is a slow climb partly confused with weather and that the remainder holds identifiable causes such as warm Decembers. Seasonal adjustment alone improves on the benchmark, but the gap to the weather regression says the next models should either include weather or model the remaining structure in the errors.

References

Cleveland, R. B., Cleveland, W. S., McRae, J. E., & Terpenning, I. (1990). STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. Journal of Official Statistics, 6(1), 3-73.

Findley, D. F., Monsell, B. C., Bell, W. R., Otto, M. C., & Chen, B.-C. (1998). New capabilities and methods of the X-12-ARIMA seasonal-adjustment program. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 16(2), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1998.10524743

Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). Forecasting: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). OTexts.

What the BFO 7010 Module 5 instructions ask for

BFO-7010 lists six written assignments across its eight modules, and decomposition is a natural subject for the one placed in Module 5, though the syllabus does not say which modules carry them. Assignments are built mostly from the textbook's exercises, with data linked inside the assignment. For decomposition, expect to compute or interpret a moving-average trend, estimate seasonal indices, choose between additive and multiplicative forms, produce a seasonally adjusted series and comment on the remainder. Some versions ask for an STL fit in R and a comparison with the classical result. The propane data on this page are a composite series built for the sample; your own assignment supplies the textbook's series and will say whether R output must be included.

How this BFO 7010 Module 5 example is built

The method section explains the 2x12 moving average and how the indices are centered, in words a manager could follow. Part A tabulates additive and multiplicative indices side by side and reads them in gallons and as percentages. Part B describes the trend, notes where weather leaks into it and traces the largest remainder to a specific warm month. Part C forecasts the hold-out year from the components and compares the result with the Module 2 benchmark and the Module 4 regression in one table. Part D names the method's weaknesses and the alternative the textbook prefers, and the conclusion states what the decomposition says about the next modeling step.

Reading the BFO 7010 Module 5 grading rubric

Decomposition answers count within the 40 percent of the course grade reserved for written work. Mentors want indices that are computed correctly and centered, a seasonally adjusted series that makes sense and a clear explanation of why one form, additive or multiplicative, suits the data. Interpretation carries much of the credit: saying what the trend shows, what the largest remainders mean and how strong the seasonality is. Connecting the module to the rest of the course, for example by comparing the decomposition forecast with earlier benchmarks, shows the kind of judgment the course objectives describe as evaluating model validity. Answers that report numbers without stating what they mean for the business usually lose marks.

BFO 7010 Module 5 help from the desk

The usual slips here are using a simple 12-month average without the centering step, forgetting to center the indices so they sum to zero (or average to one) and calling every bump in the remainder random. Check that the seasonal indices balance before using them. Say why you chose additive or multiplicative. Look up what happened in the months with the largest remainders, since a cause often hides there. When forecasting from the parts, set the result beside the seasonal naive benchmark so the reader can see whether the extra method paid off. A free first sample on your own BFO-7010 Module 5 data can be requested.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More BFO 7010 and MBA in Data Analytics sample papers

BFO 7010 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free BFO 7010 Module 5 sample paper?

The propane decomposition above estimates additive and multiplicative seasonal indices, explains a warm-December remainder and forecasts the test year from the seasonally adjusted series.

Why use a 2x12 moving average for monthly data?

A plain 12-month average is not centered on a month; averaging two of them, which halves the end weights, centers the trend estimate and treats every calendar month equally.

When should I use multiplicative decomposition?

When the seasonal swing grows or shrinks in proportion to the level of the series, as it does in a fast-growing business.

What is a seasonally adjusted series?

The original data with the seasonal component removed, leaving trend-cycle plus remainder, so month-to-month changes can be compared directly.

What is STL decomposition?

Seasonal and trend decomposition using loess, a method that lets the seasonal pattern change over time and resists the pull of outliers.