DAM 7020 Module 3 Midterm Paper: Why Predictive Modeling Matters, With Driving and Fuel Data for a Service Chain Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

Here is a DAM 7020 Module 3 example of the five-page midterm in DAM-7020, Predictive Analytics for Business Intelligence, which students take in the MBA in Data Analytics at TESU. The five-page midterm asks students to collect at least two substantially different statistical data sets into a csv file and write about the importance of data science and predictive modeling in business today; Module 3 covers data science and predictive modeling. It comes from the analytics manager of the New Jersey tire chain. The paper argues for prediction using research, joins federal driving and fuel price data with the chain's service counts and explores what they reveal.

CourseDAM-7020 Predictive Analytics for Business Intelligence
ModuleModule 3
Paper typeMidterm paper: data science and predictive modeling in business
LengthAbout 815 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramMBA in Data Analytics
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DAM 7020 Module 3

1

Miles Driven, Tires Sold: Why Predictive Modeling Matters to an Auto Service Chain

Student Name

MBA in Data Analytics, Thomas Edison State University

DAM-7020: Predictive Analytics for Business Intelligence

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title links a public measure of driving to the chain's own sales, which is the predictive relationship the paper tests.
2

Miles Driven, Tires Sold: Why Predictive Modeling Matters to an Auto Service Chain

Why Prediction Matters Now

Businesses have always forecast, but three changes have made predictive modeling central. Data are more plentiful, computing is cheap and competitors use prediction to price, stock and staff. Shmueli and Koppius (2011) separate models built to test why something happens from models built to guess the next value well, and argue that predictive analytics deserves a place of its own because it can reveal new relationships, assess how predictable a phenomenon is and compare competing approaches by their real-world accuracy. For a business, the test of a model is simple: does it predict next month well enough to change a decision?

The Business Problem

Our 40 shops order tires from a regional warehouse each week and set technician schedules each Monday. Orders are based on the same week last year, adjusted by instinct. In the past two years the chain ran out of common tire sizes in 9 percent of store-weeks and paid technicians about $410,000 in avoidable overtime during demand spikes. A better forecast of monthly demand for tires and brake work would let the warehouse stock ahead of peaks and managers schedule accordingly.

The Data

Two public data sets, substantially different in source and content, were joined with the chain's own records in one csv file of 120 monthly rows, January 2015 through December 2024.

Cleaning addressed three issues: gasoline prices were averaged from weeks to calendar months, the 2020 pandemic months were flagged because driving collapsed, and two stores opened during the period were removed from the counts to keep the series comparable.

Data setSourceVariableFrequency
Traffic Volume TrendsFederal Highway Administration (2024)Vehicle miles traveled, New Jersey and nationalMonthly
Retail gasoline prices(U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2024)Regular gasoline, Central Atlantic regionWeekly, averaged to monthly
Service countsChain recordsTire installations and brake jobs, all storesMonthly
What this page is doingJoining public and company data in one file is what lets an outside measure such as miles driven be tested as a predictor of the chain's own demand.
3

What the Data Show

Exploratory analysis found three patterns. First, tire installations follow a strong seasonal cycle, peaking in November and April as drivers switch to or from winter readiness and prepare for travel. Second, monthly vehicle miles traveled in New Jersey correlated 0.62 with brake jobs two months later, a plausible lag since wear accumulates with driving. Third, gasoline prices had a weaker negative relationship with miles traveled, about -0.31, consistent with drivers cutting back modestly when fuel is expensive. A simple comparison showed that a model using season and lagged miles traveled would have predicted 2024 monthly brake jobs with a mean absolute percentage error of about 7 percent, compared with 15 percent for the current same-month-last-year method.

Method for 2024 brake jobsMean absolute percentage error
Same month last year15 percent
Season plus miles traveled two months earlier7 percent

Data Science in the Organization

Prediction matters only if people use it. Shmueli and Koppius (2011) stress evaluating predictive models on data they were not fitted to; the 2024 comparison above follows that rule and gives managers a number they can understand. The final project will build the model fully in R, store by store, and test whether adding gasoline prices and weather improves accuracy.

Data Science as an Organizational Practice

The midterm also shows what data science requires beyond models. The analysis depended on knowing which public series exist, how they are defined and how they change when agencies revise them; on cleaning decisions that someone must document; and on business knowledge, such as the link between driving and brake wear, that suggested where to look. Shmueli and Koppius (2011) argue that predictive models can also generate new theory by revealing relationships no one had hypothesized. Here, the two-month lag between driving and brake work was such a discovery for our managers, who had always treated brake demand as random. Loshin (2012) observes that business intelligence pays off only when insight reaches decisions through dependable routines. Turning that kind of insight into routine requires a person responsible for the data, a regular schedule for updating it and managers who know how to read a forecast's error range.

The lag also means brake forecasts can be issued two months ahead using data already published, a practical advantage for scheduling technicians and ordering pads and rotors.

Limitations

Public driving data are statewide and arrive with a delay of about two months, which happens to match the lag in the brake relationship but limits its use for shorter forecasts. Correlations in a single period may not hold after shocks like 2020. The chain's counts mix walk-in and appointment demand.

Conclusion

Predictive modeling has become central to business because accurate forecasts change everyday decisions. For an auto service chain, public data on driving, joined with the chain's own records, already show a forecasting method that halves the error of current practice, a strong case for the full model in the final project.

References

Federal Highway Administration. (2024). Traffic volume trends. U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/travel_monitoring/tvt.cfm

Loshin, D. (2012). Business intelligence: The savvy manager's guide (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.

Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042796

U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2024). Weekly retail gasoline and diesel prices. https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/

DAM 7020 Module 3 instructions, in plain terms

The DAM-7020 midterm is a five-page APA paper on the importance of data science and predictive modeling in business today, built on at least two substantially different statistical data sets that you find, collect and place in a csv file. Explain why prediction matters, using research and the course text, then show with your data how prediction could support decisions in a real organization. Describe sources, cleaning and joining so the file could be rebuilt, report what an exploratory analysis shows and compare predictive performance with current practice if you can. The final project will extend this work in R. Show the cleaning steps so the file could be rebuilt.

Inside the DAM 7020 Module 3 example

The paper argues for prediction with Shmueli and Koppius's distinction between explanatory and predictive modeling. It states the chain's problem in figures: stockouts in 9 percent of store-weeks and $410,000 in avoidable overtime. A table names two public data sets, federal vehicle miles traveled and regional gasoline prices, joined with service counts in a 120-row file, and cleaning steps are listed. Exploratory findings show seasonality, a lagged link from driving to brake jobs and a weaker fuel effect. A second table compares forecast error with current practice. Loshin's emphasis on use frames the section on data science in the organization, and limitations close the paper. A section on data science as a practice explains the people and routines the analysis depends on. A table compares forecast error with current practice.

Reading the DAM 7020 Module 3 grading rubric

Mentors grade the midterm on a clear case for predictive modeling grounded in research, at least two substantially different data sets properly collected and described, sound exploratory analysis, interpretation tied to business decisions and APA writing. Naming sources precisely and documenting cleaning shows rigor. Comparing predictive accuracy with current practice, on data held back from model building, shows the evaluation the course emphasizes. Admitting limits such as lags and structural breaks shows judgment. Mentors also look for an account of what data science needs beyond a model, such as ownership and documented cleaning. Reporting forecast error in a measure managers understand makes the case concrete.

Common DAM 7020 Module 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Midterms lose marks when data sets are vague or too similar, when the paper discusses data science in general without any data or when correlations are presented as forecasts. Choose two different public sources that plausibly relate to an outcome your organization cares about, document how you joined them, explore patterns and test a simple prediction against current practice. Say which decision changes. A free first draft of your DAM-7020 midterm can be built on your data. Explain what the organization must do to keep the analysis current. Compare a simple prediction with current practice using a measure such as average percentage error.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More DAM 7020 and MBA in Data Analytics sample papers

DAM 7020 Module 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DAM 7020 Module 3 sample paper?

The midterm above joins federal driving and fuel data with an auto service chain's records to show the value of predictive modeling.

What does the DAM-7020 midterm require?

A five-page APA paper on the importance of data science and predictive modeling, using at least two different statistical data sets in a csv file.

What is the difference between explanatory and predictive modeling?

Explanatory modeling tests why outcomes occur, while predictive modeling aims to forecast new observations accurately.

How do you judge a predictive model?

Test it on a period it never saw and compare its average percentage error with what the business does now.

What public data can help forecast auto service demand?

Federal vehicle miles traveled and regional fuel price series are examples of public data related to driving and wear.