ACC 2010 Module 5 Inventories Written Assignment Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This ACC 2010 Module 5 example answers a written assignment on inventories in Intermediate Accounting I. Taken in TESU's Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, ACC-2010 asks for each homework figure to be traceable to a calculation. The Ridgeline 40 backpack, one of the invented Kittatinny Outdoor Gear, Inc. product lines, carries the whole set. Part A costs the year's sales of one backpack line under periodic FIFO, LIFO and weighted average and compares gross profit. Part B computes the LIFO reserve and its tax effect. A rival's price cut then forces a markdown test on the packs still on hand, and the gross profit method estimates what burned in the February 2026 warehouse fire first noted in the balance sheet set.

CourseACC-2010 Intermediate Accounting I
ModuleModule 5
Paper typeWritten Assignment 5: inventories
LengthAbout 690 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramBachelor of Science in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for ACC 2010 Module 5

1

Kittatinny Outdoor Gear, Inc.: Three Cost Flows for One Backpack, a Price-Driven Write-Down and a Fire Loss Estimate

Student Name

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Thomas Edison State University

ACC-2010: Intermediate Accounting I

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title previews the four questions the assignment answers for one product line and one unexpected loss.
2

Kittatinny Outdoor Gear, Inc.: Three Cost Flows for One Backpack, a Price-Driven Write-Down and a Fire Loss Estimate

Introduction

Inventory is Kittatinny's largest current asset, so the cost flow method it chooses affects both gross profit and the balance sheet. This assignment applies the methods in the module to the Ridgeline 40, a 40-liter backpack, and then estimates a loss that could not be counted directly.

Part A: Cost Flow Methods, Periodic System

During 2025 Kittatinny sold 1,700 backpacks at $95, for revenue of $161,500, leaving 600 units on hand.

The weighted-average unit cost is $129,300 divided by 2,300 units. With each purchase dearer than the last, FIFO charges the January and March packs against 2025 sales and keeps the October cost on the shelf, so it reports the most profit (Spiceland et al., 2020). LIFO does the reverse. The average method falls between them. The choice also affects taxes and comparability: a company that uses LIFO for taxes must also use it in its financial statements, and a company that switches methods must justify the change as preferable and apply it retrospectively. For a product whose costs have risen about 22% in one year, as the Ridgeline 40's have, the differences among methods are large enough for users to need the method disclosed.

DateUnitsUnit costTotal
January 1 inventory400$50$20,000
March 10 purchase6005432,400
July 22 purchase8005846,400
October 5 purchase5006130,500
Goods available2,300$56.2174 average$129,300
Cost flow assumptionUnits left, at costCost of 1,700 packs soldProfit before expenses
FIFO500 x $61 + 100 x $58 = $36,300$93,000$68,500
LIFO400 x $50 + 200 x $54 = $30,80098,50063,000
Weighted average600 x $56.2174 = $33,73095,57065,930
What this page is doingThe three methods share one table with the arithmetic in each cell, so the mentor can verify the ending inventory and see the effect of rising costs at a glance.
3

Part B: The LIFO Reserve and Taxes

If Kittatinny used LIFO internally for this line, the LIFO reserve, the difference between FIFO and LIFO inventory, would be $36,300 minus $30,800, or $5,500. That amount is also the cumulative difference in cost of goods sold. At a 25% tax rate, LIFO would lower 2025 taxes by $1,375, which explains its appeal when costs rise. The trade-off is a balance sheet that shows inventory at older, lower costs. Jennings et al. (1996) found that LIFO cost of goods sold explained market values better than FIFO amounts, while the LIFO balance sheet figure needed the reserve added back to be useful, which is why companies using LIFO disclose the reserve.

Part C: Lower of Cost and Net Realizable Value

In December a competitor cut the price of a similar pack, and Kittatinny expects to sell its remaining Ridgeline 40s for $68 each, with $9 per unit of selling costs. Net realizable value is therefore $59 per unit. Under FIFO, the 600 units on hand include 500 that cost $61 and 100 that cost $58.

The October layer is written down by $2 a unit, a $1,000 loss recognized in 2025, usually within cost of goods sold. The July units stay at cost because their net realizable value exceeds it. Companies using FIFO or average cost apply this test; LIFO users apply the older lower of cost or market rule instead (Financial Accounting Standards Board [FASB], 2015). U.S. GAAP does not allow the write-down to be reversed if prices recover.

LayerUnitsCostNet realizable valueCarrying amount
October purchase500$61$59$59
July purchase100585958

Part D: Gross Profit Method for the Fire Loss

The warehouse fire on February 14, 2026 made a physical count of the lost goods impossible. The gross profit method estimates what inventory should have been.

The 62% cost ratio comes from Kittatinny's historical gross profit rate of 38%. The estimate supports the insurance claim and the subsequent event disclosure, and it is reasonable only if the recent margin resembles the historical one.

EstimateAmount
Inventory, January 1, 2026$318,000
Purchases, January 1 to February 14142,000
Goods available460,000
Sales of $240,000 times the 62% cost ratio(148,800)
Estimated inventory at the date of the fire311,200
Inventory salvaged, counted at cost(226,200)
Estimated inventory lost$85,000
What this page is doingPart D reuses figures from earlier assignments, so the fire loss in the notes and the estimate here agree, a consistency mentors appreciate.
4

References

Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2015). Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the measurement of inventory (Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-11).

Jennings, R., Simko, P. J., & Thompson, R. B., II. (1996). Does LIFO inventory accounting improve the income statement at the expense of the balance sheet? Journal of Accounting Research, 34(1), 85-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491333

Spiceland, J. D., Nelson, M. W., & Thomas, W. B. (2020). Intermediate accounting (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

ACC 2010 Module 5 instructions, in plain terms

Written Assignment 5 covers Module 5, Inventories, which spans two textbook chapters on measuring inventory and on the additional issues of valuation and estimation. Expect numbered exercises first and longer problems after, drawn from the two inventory chapters, each answered with full working. Expect cost flow items under both periodic and perpetual records, LIFO reserves and liquidations, markdowns to net realizable value, the gross profit and retail estimates and, now and then, an inventory error that reverses the next year. Here a single backpack line carries every part, so the cost flow methods can be compared on identical purchases. Some versions also ask about inventory errors and how they reverse in the following year.

How the ACC 2010 Module 5 example is put together

The Ridgeline 40's four cost layers go into one table, and a second table prices the year's sales three ways with the multiplication written in each cell, followed by a few sentences on why rising costs pull the methods apart. Part B turns the FIFO and LIFO gap into a reserve, prices its tax saving and cites evidence on what investors make of LIFO numbers. Part C applies the net realizable value test layer by layer and states which rule applies to which methods. Part D uses the gross profit method to estimate the fire loss, linking it to the subsequent event disclosed in the balance sheet assignment. Figures from the balance sheet and fire disclosure reappear unchanged, so the assignments read as one company's year.

ACC 2010 Module 5 rubric: what earns full marks

Inventory homework counts within the 30 percent pool that five of the six written assignments share. Graders trace each method's ending units back to the layers they came from; a correctly computed weighted-average cost; the LIFO reserve stated and interpreted; the right application of net realizable value, including which units are written down and by how much; and a gross profit estimate that uses the cost ratio rather than the gross profit ratio. Explanations of why methods differ, and of when each valuation rule applies, earn credit beyond the arithmetic. Complete, labeled schedules make partial credit possible if one figure is off. A short written comparison of the methods, not just three numbers, adds the interpretation mentors reward.

ACC 2010 Module 5 help: mistakes that cost marks

Inventory assignments trip students up in predictable places. Under LIFO periodic, the ending inventory is the oldest cost layers, not the last purchase. The weighted-average cost uses total goods available, including beginning inventory. Net realizable value is the selling price less costs to sell, not the selling price alone, and the test is applied to layers or items, not to the whole inventory at once unless the instructions allow it. In the gross profit method, multiply sales by the cost ratio, which is one minus the gross profit rate. Lay out each method in its own column. If your inventory items differ, a writer can cost them by each method for you, with the first custom set free.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More ACC 2010 and Bachelor of Science in Business Administration sample papers

ACC 2010 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free ACC 2010 Module 5 sample paper?

Scroll up for the finished inventory assignment: FIFO, LIFO and weighted average for one product line, the LIFO reserve, a net realizable value write-down and a gross profit estimate of a fire loss.

Which inventory method gives the highest profit when costs rise?

First in, first out: when prices climb, it charges the cheapest early purchases to cost of sales and leaves the dearest recent ones in stock.

What is the LIFO reserve?

The difference between inventory measured at FIFO and at LIFO, which LIFO companies disclose so users can compare them with FIFO companies.

How does the lower of cost and net realizable value rule work?

If what a company expects to net from selling goods drops beneath what they cost, it marks them down to that net amount; firms on FIFO or average cost use this test.

How does the gross profit method estimate inventory?

It subtracts estimated cost of goods sold, sales times one minus the gross profit rate, from goods available for sale.