| Course | PSY-3520 Psychology of Personality |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Written assignment: psychodynamic theories after Freud |
| Length | About 1,041 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Bachelor of Arts in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PSY 3520 Module 3
From Drives to Relationships: Klein, Horney, Fromm and Erikson Meet the Research
Student Name
Bachelor of Arts in Psychology, Thomas Edison State University
PSY-3520: Psychology of Personality
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
From Drives to Relationships: Klein, Horney, Fromm and Erikson Meet the Research
Introduction
My cousin, now 23, falls quickly into intense relationships and then panics that her partners will leave, which they eventually do. She has also changed majors three times and says she does not know who she is. Freud would have looked for drives and conflicts. The theorists in this module looked instead at relationships, culture and the search for identity. This paper explains four of them and tests their central ideas against research.
Melanie Klein
Klein developed object relations theory, which proposes that the infant's earliest relationships, especially with the mother, are internalized as mental representations, or objects, that shape later relationships. She described how infants experience caregivers as both gratifying and frustrating and must learn to integrate these into a whole person. Her emphasis on internal representations of early relationships influenced later attachment theory and psychodynamic therapy.
Karen Horney
Horney rejected Freud's view of women and emphasized culture and relationships. She proposed that children who feel unloved or insecure develop basic anxiety, a sense of being alone in a hostile world. To cope, they adopt strategies, which she called neurotic trends: moving toward people, seeking approval and dependence; moving against people, seeking power and control; or moving away from people, seeking independence and withdrawal. Healthy people use all three flexibly, while neurotic people rely rigidly on one.
Erich Fromm
Fromm argued that personality is shaped by society. Modern freedom, he wrote, brings anxiety and isolation, which people may escape by submitting to authority, by destructiveness or by conformity. He described character orientations shaped by economic life, such as the marketing orientation, in which people treat themselves as commodities to be sold, and the productive orientation, in which people realize their potential through love and work.
Erik Erikson
Erikson extended development across the whole lifespan in eight psychosocial stages, each defined by a crisis: trust versus mistrust in infancy, autonomy versus shame, initiative versus guilt, industry versus inferiority, identity versus role confusion in adolescence, intimacy versus isolation in young adulthood, generativity versus stagnation in middle age and integrity versus despair in late life. Resolving each crisis builds a strength that supports later development.
Testing Relationships: Adult Attachment
Attachment theory, which grew partly from object relations ideas, proposes that early experiences with caregivers create working models of relationships. Hazan and Shaver (1987) applied this to adult romantic love. Through a questionnaire published in a newspaper and a follow-up study, they classified adults as secure, avoidant or anxious-ambivalent in romantic relationships, finding proportions similar to those found in infants. Attachment style was related to how people described their most important love relationships and their memories of their parents: anxious-ambivalent adults reported more obsession, jealousy and emotional extremes, as Horney's moving toward people and Klein's anxious internal objects might predict.
How Stable Are Attachment Patterns?
If early relationships shape later ones, attachment should be somewhat stable over time. Pinquart et al. (2013) meta-analyzed longitudinal studies that assessed attachment in the same people at two or more points between infancy and early adulthood. They found moderate stability overall, with stability weaker when the interval between assessments was longer. The pattern suggests that early working models of relationships tend to persist while remaining open to change through later experiences, such as new caregivers, partners or major life events.
Testing Identity: Marcia's Statuses
Marcia (1966) translated Erikson's identity crisis into measurable statuses, based on whether a young person had explored alternatives and whether they had committed to choices in areas such as occupation and beliefs. Identity achievement involves exploration followed by commitment; moratorium involves current exploration without commitment; foreclosure involves commitment without exploration, often adopting parents' choices; and identity diffusion involves neither. In his study of college men, those in different statuses differed on tasks and measures in ways the theory predicted, with identity-achieved students performing well under stress.
| Source | Key finding | Theorist it supports |
|---|---|---|
| Hazan and Shaver (1987) | Adults show secure, avoidant and anxious romantic attachment | Klein, Horney: early relationships shape later ones |
| Pinquart et al. (2013) | Attachment moderately stable, weaker over longer intervals | Early working models persist but can change |
| Marcia (1966) | Identity statuses are measurable and meaningful | Erikson: identity crisis of adolescence |
Understanding My Cousin
These theories and studies suggest two lenses for my cousin. Her intense, anxious relationships resemble anxious-ambivalent attachment, perhaps shaped by an unstable childhood, and Horney's moving toward people. Her repeated changes of major may reflect moratorium, an active and healthy period of exploration, rather than failure. Pinquart and colleagues' findings offer hope: attachment patterns can change with secure relationships and, sometimes, therapy.
Erikson Beyond Adolescence
Erikson's later stages also inspired research. Studies of generativity, the wish to nurture those who come after us, find that adults who score high on generativity tend to be more involved parents, mentors and community members and report greater well-being. Such findings extend Erikson's lifespan view beyond the identity crisis that receives most attention.
Horney and Culture
Horney's insistence that culture, not anatomy, explains differences between men and women anticipated later research on gender roles and helped make psychodynamic theory more attentive to social context.
Fromm Today
Fromm's marketing orientation feels current in an age of personal branding on social media. His idea that social and economic structures shape character connects to modern research on culture and personality, though his specific orientations have little direct empirical testing.
Attachment at Work
Attachment styles also show up at work. People with anxious attachment may seek constant reassurance from supervisors, while avoidant people may resist asking for help. Recognizing these patterns can help managers respond with patience rather than frustration.
Limits
Attachment research uses self-report in adults, and the categories simplify continuous differences. Marcia's original sample was small and all male. Klein's and Fromm's ideas are difficult to test directly.
Conclusion
Klein, Horney, Fromm and Erikson shifted psychodynamic theory from drives to relationships, culture and identity. Hazan and Shaver found that adult love reflects attachment patterns, Pinquart and colleagues found those patterns moderately stable yet open to change and Marcia showed that Erikson's identity crisis can be measured. Their ideas help explain why people repeat relationship patterns and search for who they are, and the research shows that both patterns and identities can change.
References
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551-558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281
Pinquart, M., Feußner, C., & Ahnert, L. (2013). Meta-analytic evidence for stability in attachments from infancy to early adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 15(2), 189-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.746257
What the PSY 3520 Module 3 instructions ask for
TESU's public syllabus for PSY-3520 names Module 3 Psychodynamic Theories: Klein, Horney, Fromm, and Erickson. Explain each theorist's main ideas and how they departed from Freud, then test at least two of their central claims with research, such as studies of attachment or identity development. Discuss how well the evidence supports the theories, what it adds and what remains untested. Apply the theories and findings to a realistic person or situation, respecting privacy. Some sections ask students to apply Erikson's stages to their own life instead. Check whether a personal application is expected and whether the syllabus spelling of Erikson should be followed in your title. Explain each theorist's departure from Freud in a sentence or two before turning to the research.
How the PSY 3520 Module 3 example is put together
Nadia Hassan, the invented TESU psychology student, wonders why her cousin repeats anxious relationship patterns and keeps changing majors. Klein's object relations, Horney's basic anxiety and three trends, Fromm's social character and Erikson's eight stages are explained. Hazan and Shaver's study of adult attachment, Pinquart and colleagues' meta-analysis of attachment stability and Marcia's identity statuses are linked to the theorists in a table. Sections apply the theories to her cousin, consider Fromm's marketing orientation today and close with limits and a conclusion. Erikson's adult stage of generativity and Horney's attention to culture are covered too. A section on attachment at work extends the application.
Where the marks sit in the PSY 3520 Module 3 rubric
Neo-Freudian theory papers earn high marks when each theorist's ideas are explained accurately, including how they departed from Freud, and when at least two central claims are tested with research. Readers look for correct descriptions of attachment studies and identity statuses and for a careful account of what the evidence supports, such as moderate stability of attachment, rather than overstatement. Noting which ideas remain hard to test, such as Klein's and Fromm's, shows critical judgment. Applying theories and findings to a realistic person while respecting privacy, and recognizing that patterns can change, shows mature understanding. Extending Erikson beyond adolescence and noting Horney's focus on culture show breadth across the theorists. Applying attachment ideas to work shows the theories' reach.
Common PSY 3520 Module 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Papers on Klein, Horney, Fromm and Erikson often summarize each theorist in turn without testing anything. Explain how each departed from Freud, then use research on attachment or identity to test their focus on relationships and development. Say what the evidence supports and what remains untested. Apply the ideas to a realistic person, protecting privacy, and note that patterns can change. Pass along your neo-Freudian prompt and any assigned readings, for a free first draft you can revise. Include at least one finding on Erikson's adult stages, such as generativity. Apply attachment ideas to a setting you know, such as work, while protecting privacy.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More PSY 3520 and Bachelor of Arts in Psychology sample papers
- PSY 3520 Module 1: Trait Theories Paper: The Five-Factor Model, Personality Change and What Traits Predict
- PSY 3520 Module 2: Freud, Adler and Jung Paper: Testing Classic Psychoanalytic Ideas Against Modern Evidence
- PSY 3520 Module 4: Humanistic Theories Paper: Maslow's Needs, Rogers's Conditions of Worth and Modern Evidence
- PSY 3520 Module 5: Learning Theories Paper: Skinner, Bandura and Rotter on How Personality Is Learned
- PSY 3520 Module 6: Cognitive-Existential Theories Paper: Kelly's Personal Constructs, May's Existentialism and Mortality Research
- PSY 3740 Module 5: Cognitive Functioning Paper: Long-Term Potentiation, the Molecular Basis of Memory and Broca's Patients Revisited
- PSY 1010 Module 1: Foundations Written Assignment
- PSY 4000 Module 1: Introduction and Influences Paper: Philosophical Roots, Darwin and How Psychology Writes Its Own History
- PSY 3220 Module 9: Generalization Paper: Replication, WEIRD Samples and Whether a Phone Effect Holds Up
PSY 3520 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free PSY 3520 Module 3 sample paper?
The paper on Klein, Horney, Fromm and Erikson and the research that tests them appears here in full.
What are Horney's three neurotic trends?
Moving toward people, moving against people and moving away from people as strategies for coping with basic anxiety.
What are Erikson's psychosocial stages?
Eight stages from trust versus mistrust in infancy to integrity versus despair in late life, each with a central crisis.
Is attachment stable from infancy to adulthood?
Pinquart and colleagues found moderate stability that weakened over longer intervals.
What are Marcia's identity statuses?
Achievement, moratorium, foreclosure and diffusion, based on exploration and commitment.