| Course | PSY-3310 Clinical Interventions and Disorders |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Written assignment: depth-oriented therapies |
| Length | About 1,034 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Bachelor of Arts in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PSY 3310 Module 3
Old Patterns, New Evidence: Do Insight-Oriented Therapies Work?
Student Name
Bachelor of Arts in Psychology, Thomas Edison State University
PSY-3310: Clinical Interventions and Disorders
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Old Patterns, New Evidence: Do Insight-Oriented Therapies Work?
Introduction
In a case conference at our center, a therapist described her work with a client on "patterns he keeps repeating in relationships, which started long before he met any of his partners." I had assumed that psychodynamic therapy was mostly history, replaced by structured treatments. This paper explains three depth-oriented approaches and asks whether research supports them.
Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Therapy
Freud's psychoanalysis proposed that most mental activity happens outside awareness, that early relationships shape later patterns and that symptoms can express conflicts a person cannot face directly. Classical psychoanalysis involved frequent sessions and techniques such as free association. Modern psychodynamic therapy is usually less intensive but keeps the focus on emotions, unconscious patterns, defenses and the relationship between client and therapist, where old patterns often reappear and can be examined.
Adlerian Therapy
Alfred Adler, an early colleague of Freud, emphasized social interest, the striving to belong and contribute, and the ways people compensate for feelings of inferiority. Adlerian therapy explores a client's lifestyle, the beliefs and goals formed in childhood that guide behavior, often through early memories and family position, and encourages clients to pursue goals that connect them with others. Its ideas influenced later cognitive and family therapies.
Existential Therapy
Existential therapists, such as Rollo May, Viktor Frankl and Irvin Yalom, focus on universal human concerns: death, freedom and responsibility, isolation and the search for meaning. Rather than treating symptoms as illnesses, they help clients face these concerns, take responsibility for their choices and find meaning, even in suffering.
Evidence for Psychodynamic Therapy
Shedler (2010) reviewed meta-analyses and argued that psychodynamic therapy is supported by evidence, despite a common belief that it is not. Effect sizes for psychodynamic therapy were as large as those reported for other therapies considered evidence-based, and several studies found clients kept improving once therapy was over, unlike some other treatments whose effects faded. Shedler also noted that when sessions of other therapies were examined closely, the most successful ones often included psychodynamic elements, such as attention to feelings and to patterns that recur across relationships.
Leichsenring and Rabung (2008) meta-analyzed 23 studies of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy, defined as lasting at least a year or 50 sessions, for patients with complex problems, including personality disorders, long-lasting conditions and several co-occurring disorders. Long-term psychodynamic therapy was more effective than shorter forms of therapy on overall outcome, target problems and personality functioning; after treatment, patients on average were better off than about 96 percent of patients in the comparison groups.
Evidence for Existential Therapy
Vos et al. (2015) meta-analyzed 15 trials of existential therapies with about 1,800 participants, many of whom had serious physical illnesses such as cancer. Meaning-centered approaches, which help clients identify sources of meaning, led to sizable gains in clients' sense of purpose and moderate easing of distress. Results for the remaining existential formats were smaller and more mixed. The authors called for more and larger trials.
| Source | Key finding | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Shedler (2010) | Psychodynamic effects match other evidence-based therapies and grow after treatment | Depth-oriented work has evidence |
| Leichsenring and Rabung (2008) | Long-term psychodynamic therapy outperformed shorter therapies for complex disorders | Longer treatment suits complex problems |
| Vos et al. (2015) | Meaning-centered existential therapy improved meaning and reduced distress | Useful when meaning is the central struggle |
Applying the Approaches
Consider a composite client, Michael, 41, whose third long relationship has ended with the same pattern: early closeness followed by his withdrawal and his partner's frustration. A psychodynamic therapist might explore how he learned in childhood that closeness leads to disappointment and notice when he begins to withdraw from the therapist. An Adlerian therapist might explore his early memories and belief that he must be self-sufficient. An existential therapist might explore his fear of depending on others and his freedom to choose differently.
Choosing a Fit
For Michael's long-standing relationship pattern, the evidence from Leichsenring and Rabung suggests that a longer psychodynamic therapy may be appropriate. If his concerns centered on meaning after a loss, a meaning-centered existential approach would fit the evidence Vos and colleagues reviewed.
Criticisms
Critics note that many psychodynamic studies are smaller and less tightly controlled than CBT trials, that long-term therapy is costly and that some outcomes, such as personality functioning, are hard to measure. Adlerian therapy has relatively little controlled research.
What Happens in a Psychodynamic Session
A session might begin with the client describing a disappointing week. The therapist listens for themes, such as feeling overlooked, and gently asks whether this feeling is familiar from earlier relationships. If the client seems to withdraw from the therapist, missing a session or speaking more guardedly, the therapist may wonder aloud whether something in the relationship feels similar. Over time, noticing these patterns as they happen allows the client to understand and change them.
Short-Term Psychodynamic Therapy
Not all psychodynamic therapy is long. Short-term forms, typically 12 to 30 sessions, focus on a specific relationship pattern and have been tested in trials for depression and anxiety, where they generally perform comparably to other active treatments. These briefer forms may fit community centers better than open-ended therapy.
Adlerian Ideas Today
Though Adlerian therapy has little trial research of its own, its ideas live on. Encouragement, attention to family and birth order and the focus on belonging appear in parenting programs and in school counseling, and the emphasis on beliefs about oneself anticipated cognitive therapy.
Measuring Change in Depth Therapies
Outcome research on these therapies often measures symptoms, but their aims are broader: changes in relationship patterns, self-understanding and personality functioning. Measuring such changes requires interviews and ratings that are harder to standardize, one reason these therapies have fewer large trials. Researchers have developed tools to rate personality functioning, which allow fairer comparisons with symptom-focused treatments.
Limits
Meta-analyses combine studies of varying quality. The client is a composite.
Conclusion
Shedler showed that psychodynamic therapy's effects are comparable to other evidence-based treatments and may grow over time, Leichsenring and Rabung showed that long-term psychodynamic therapy helps patients with complex disorders and Vos, Craig and Cooper found that meaning-centered existential therapy improves meaning and reduces distress. Insight-oriented therapies are not merely history; for some clients and problems, the evidence supports them.
References
Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 300(13), 1551-1565. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.13.1551
Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018378
Vos, J., Craig, M., & Cooper, M. (2015). Existential therapies: A meta-analysis of their effects on psychological outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037167
What the PSY 3310 Module 3 instructions ask for
TESU's public syllabus for PSY-3310 names Module 3 Psychoanalytic, Adlerian, and Existential Approaches. Explain the core ideas and techniques of each approach in your own words, then evaluate the research evidence for psychodynamic and existential therapies using meta-analyses or reviews, including the kinds of clients and problems studied. Apply all three approaches to the same composite client, showing how each would understand and work with the problem, and discuss which approach the evidence best supports for that client. Address criticisms and limits fairly. A few sections assign a single theorist as the focus. Check whether primary sources by Freud, Adler or Frankl are required.
How this PSY 3310 Module 3 example is built
Darnell Price, the invented case aide, hears a therapist describe work on a client's "old patterns" and asks whether such therapies have evidence. Freud's psychoanalysis and modern psychodynamic therapy, Adler's social interest and lifestyle and existential concerns of death, freedom, isolation and meaning are explained. Shedler's review, Leichsenring and Rabung's findings on lengthy psychodynamic treatment and Vos and colleagues' meta-analysis of existential therapies are compared in a table. All three approaches are applied to a composite client with a repeating relationship pattern, followed by choosing a fit, criticisms, limits and a conclusion. Sections describe what happens in a psychodynamic session and the evidence for short-term psychodynamic therapy. Adlerian ideas in current practice are also noted. A section explains how change is measured in depth therapies.
PSY 3310 Module 3 rubric: what earns full marks
Depth-oriented therapy papers earn high marks when each approach is explained accurately and evaluated with research rather than either dismissed as outdated or defended without evidence. Readers look for correct details from meta-analyses, including the populations studied and the kinds of outcomes measured, and for honest criticisms such as smaller studies and cost. Applying all three approaches to one composite client, showing how each would frame the same problem, demonstrates understanding beyond definitions. Matching an approach to the client using the evidence shows clinical judgment. Describing a session concretely and noting short-term forms shows that the student understands how these therapies work in practice. Explaining why depth therapies are harder to measure shows awareness of research limits.
Common PSY 3310 Module 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Papers on psychodynamic, Adlerian and existential therapy often describe theorists' lives instead of their methods and evidence. Explain each approach's core ideas and techniques, then review meta-analyses for the approaches that have them, noting who was studied. Apply all three to one composite client and explain which fits best according to the evidence. Include fair criticisms. Send the prompt and any assigned theorists, and a free first draft on these approaches will come back to you. Describe what a session in each approach would actually look like. If your instructor wants primary sources, quote briefly and explain. Include how outcomes such as relationship patterns could be measured.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More PSY 3310 and Bachelor of Arts in Psychology sample papers
- PSY 3310 Module 1: Foundations of Psychological Interventions Paper: Does Therapy Work, and Why?
- PSY 3310 Module 2: Cognitive, Behavioral and Biological Approaches Paper: CBT, Medication and Depression
- PSY 3310 Module 4: Humanistic and Experiential Approaches Paper: Person-Centered, Gestalt and Reality Therapies
- PSY 3310 Module 5: Specialized Interventions and Technology Paper: Internet CBT, Mental Health Apps and Virtual Reality Exposure
- PSY 3310 Module 6: Multicultural Competence and Integrative Approaches Paper: Cultural Adaptation, Humility and Integrative Practice
- PSY 3020 Module 4: Consciousness Paper: Neural Correlates, the Global Workspace and Awareness in the Vegetative State
- PSY 3220 Module 2: Psychological Measurement Paper: Reliability, Construct Validity and Measuring Distraction
- PSY 3790 Module 3: Prejudice and Discrimination Paper: Resume Callbacks, Stereotype Threat and Intergroup Contact
- PSY 3520 Module 4: Humanistic Theories Paper: Maslow's Needs, Rogers's Conditions of Worth and Modern Evidence
PSY 3310 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free PSY 3310 Module 3 sample paper?
The paper on psychoanalytic, Adlerian and existential approaches and their evidence appears here in full.
Is psychodynamic therapy evidence-based?
Shedler found its effect sizes as large as other evidence-based therapies, with benefits that often grew after treatment.
Does long-term psychodynamic therapy help?
Leichsenring and Rabung found it outperformed shorter therapies for patients with complex mental disorders.
Does existential therapy work?
Vos and colleagues found meaning-centered existential therapy improved meaning in life and reduced distress.
What is Adler's concept of social interest?
The striving to belong to and contribute to the wider community, central to Adlerian therapy.