| Course | PJM-5300 Project Risk Management |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 |
| Paper type | Module 1 written assignment: risk planning |
| Length | About 621 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | M.S. in Management in Project Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PJM 5300 Module 1
Deciding How to Decide: A Risk Management Plan for a Packaging Line Installation
Student Name
M.S. in Management in Project Management, Thomas Edison State University
PJM-5300: Project Risk Management
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Deciding How to Decide: A Risk Management Plan for a Packaging Line Installation
The Project
A pharmaceutical client has contracted us to package a new tablet in blister packs beginning next fall. We will buy a thermoforming blister line from a German manufacturer, install it in a cleanroom suite, connect it to our serialization system and validate it under current good manufacturing practice before the client's first batch. The project has a budget of $2.4 million, a fixed client start date and a validation requirement that cannot be shortened.
Why Plan First
Kendrick (2015) argues that project risk management begins with planning the project well, because many risks only become visible once the work is broken down and scheduled, and that the risk process itself must be agreed early so the team treats risks consistently. Guidance from the Project Management Institute (2019) describes a risk management plan as the document that sets how risk activities will be structured and performed, including methodology, roles, funding, timing, categories and definitions of probability and impact.
Roles
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Project manager | Runs the risk process, maintains the register, reports to sponsor |
| Risk owners | Named for each risk; plan and carry out responses |
| Validation lead | Owns regulatory and qualification risks |
| Sponsor, operations director | Approves use of contingency reserve; decides on risks above threshold |
| Client quality representative | Reviewed on risks affecting validation or start date |
Risk Categories
Six categories guide identification: technical (equipment and integration), vendor (fabrication and delivery), regulatory and validation, resources (people and skills), facility (cleanroom and utilities) and client (requirements and approvals).
Probability and Impact Scales
A risk's score is probability times the higher of its schedule or cost impact rating. Defining the scales in numbers, rather than words like "likely," reduces the disagreement that comes from people reading the same word differently.
| Rating | Probability | Schedule impact | Cost impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Very low | Under 10 percent | Under 1 week | Under $10,000 |
| 2 Low | 10 to 30 percent | 1 to 2 weeks | $10,000 to $40,000 |
| 3 Medium | 30 to 50 percent | 2 to 4 weeks | $40,000 to $100,000 |
| 4 High | 50 to 70 percent | 4 to 8 weeks | $100,000 to $200,000 |
| 5 Very high | Over 70 percent | Over 8 weeks | Over $200,000 |
Thresholds and Escalation
Risks scoring 12 or more are reported to the sponsor within two days; risks scoring 15 or more, or any risk threatening the validation date, are reported to the client. Hillson and Murray-Webster (2007) argue that the risk attitudes of individuals and organizations shape how risks are judged, and that stating thresholds explicitly makes those attitudes visible rather than leaving them to chance. Our client is highly averse to start-date risk and moderately tolerant of cost risk, so the thresholds weight schedule more heavily.
Reserves
The plan sets a contingency reserve for identified risks, sized by the expected monetary value analysis in Module 4, and a management reserve of 5 percent of budget, $120,000, held by the sponsor for unknown risks.
Reporting and Review
The risk register will be reviewed every two weeks at the project meeting and before each phase gate: design approval, factory acceptance testing in Germany, installation and the start of validation. A one-page risk summary will go to the sponsor every two weeks.
Opportunities
Hillson (2002) argued that the risk process should address opportunities as well as threats. The plan includes them: for example, the chance that the vendor finishes early, which we could use to begin operator training sooner.
Conclusion
The plan sets the rules for every later risk decision: who owns what, how risks are scored, when they are escalated, how reserves are used and how often the register is reviewed. Agreeing these rules now prevents arguments about them later, when a real risk arrives.
References
Hillson, D. (2002). Extending the risk process to manage opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 235-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00074-6
Hillson, D., & Murray-Webster, R. (2007). Understanding and managing risk attitude (2nd ed.). Gower.
Kendrick, T. (2015). Identifying and managing project risk: Essential tools for failure-proofing your project (3rd ed.). AMACOM.
Project Management Institute. (2019). The standard for risk management in portfolios, programs, and projects. Project Management Institute.
PJM 5300 Module 1 instructions, in plain terms
PJM-5300 grades five discussions, four written assignments, three exercises, four case studies and a final project of 15 to 20 pages that applies a range of risk management principles to a project. The text is Kendrick's Identifying and Managing Project Risk. This first written assignment covers risk planning. Expect to prepare a risk management plan for a project, setting roles, categories, rating scales, thresholds, reserves and a review cycle, and to explain why each choice fits the project. Pick a project you can follow all term, because each later assignment builds on this plan. Define probability and impact in numbers, name who decides when a threshold is crossed and explain how the plan fits the stakeholders' tolerance for schedule and cost risk.
How the PJM 5300 Module 1 example is put together
The paper describes the project and explains why risk planning comes first, with the textbook and a professional standard. Tables set out roles and probability and impact scales, and a section lists six risk categories. Sections define thresholds linked to the client's risk attitude, reserves for known and unknown risks, a review cycle tied to phase gates and the place of opportunities. The conclusion states the plan's purpose. Thresholds are set from the client's stated aversion to schedule risk, and reviews are tied to the project's phase gates, from design approval to the start of validation, so the plan follows the project's real rhythm. A section on opportunities shows the plan covers upside as well as threats.
Where the marks sit in the PJM 5300 Module 1 rubric
Written assignments earn marks for accurate use of risk management concepts, a plan specific to the project, clear reasoning and organized writing. Plans with numeric scales and explicit thresholds show rigor. Linking thresholds to stakeholders' risk attitudes demonstrates understanding beyond templates. Including opportunities and separating contingency from management reserve shows command of the full risk process. Tying review timing to phase gates and thresholds to the client's risk attitude shows that the plan was built for this project rather than copied. Defining both kinds of reserve and who controls each shows financial discipline. Plain tables for roles and scales let the team use the plan without rereading it.
PJM 5300 Module 1 help from the desk
Students lose points by copying a generic template, by defining probability with vague words or by leaving out who decides on escalations and reserves. Others treat risk only as threats. Make every element specific to your project. Define scales with numbers. State thresholds and who acts on them. Include opportunities and both kinds of reserve. Tie reviews to your project's phase gates, and set thresholds from what your client or sponsor can actually tolerate. Write the plan so a new team member could follow it on day one. A free first sample on your own PJM-5300 risk planning assignment is available on request.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More PJM 5300 and M.S. in Management in Project Management sample papers
- PJM 5300 Module 2: Case Study: Building the Risk Register for the Packaging Line
- PJM 5300 Module 3: Case Study: Three-Point Estimates and the Chance of Meeting the Start Date
- PJM 5300 Module 4: Written Assignment: Expected Monetary Value, a Decision Tree and the Contingency Reserve
- PJM 5300 Module 5: Case Study: Risk Reviews, a Trigger Fired and Closing the Register
- PJM 6400 Module 3: Case Analysis: A Global Matrix and the Two-Boss Problem
- PJM 5200 Module 2: Written Assignment: A Charter and Stakeholder Plan for the Portal Upgrade
- PJM 5400 Module 1: Written Assignment: The Procurement Team and Trust for a Smart Meter Program
PJM 5300 Module 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free PJM 5300 Module 1 sample paper?
A risk management plan for a blister packaging line installation is the assignment above.
What does a risk management plan include?
Methodology, roles, categories, probability and impact definitions, thresholds, reserves and the timing of reviews.
Why define probability with numbers?
Words like likely mean different things to different people, so numeric ranges reduce disagreement.
What is the difference between contingency and management reserve?
Contingency reserve covers identified risks; management reserve covers unknown risks and is held by the sponsor.
What textbook does PJM-5300 use?
Kendrick's Identifying and Managing Project Risk, third edition, from AMACOM.