NUR 8150 Module 1 EHR Burden Paper: Event Log Data, Clerical Load and a Plan to Return Clinician Time Example

Reviewed by Gwyneth Ollerton, MSN, RN Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

EHR burden on primary care clinicians is the problem this NUR 8150 Module 1 sample paper takes on, written as a DNP systems analysis for an invented eight-clinic network in Burlington County. Prepared for NUR-8150, TESU's doctoral course on health information systems, the paper borrows the event log method of a Wisconsin study in which 142 family physicians logged nearly six EHR hours across workdays lasting more than eleven, links that load to a national survey of 6,375 physicians tying order entry to burnout, explains through the HITECH study how adoption outran design, and proposes team documentation and inbox triage with measures. NUR-8150 papers like this one cite three studies.

CourseNUR-8150 Information Systems and Technology Impacting Healthcare Delivery
ModuleModule 1
Paper typeSystems paper: EHR burden and clinician time
LengthAbout 1,059 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 8150 Module 1

1

Six Hours a Day in the Record: Measuring EHR Burden and Returning Time to Clinicians in an Eight-Clinic Primary Care Network

Student Name

Doctor of Nursing Practice, Thomas Edison State University

NUR-8150: Information Systems and Technology Impacting Healthcare Delivery

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title leads with the measured time, because a systems paper earns its proposal by first showing the size of the problem in the organization's own data.
2

Six Hours a Day in the Record: Measuring EHR Burden and Returning Time to Clinicians in an Eight-Clinic Primary Care Network

The Problem in Our Network

The network in this paper is invented: eight family medicine clinics across Burlington County, 46 physicians and nurse practitioners, and about 92,000 patients. In the past two years, four clinicians have left, and exit interviews named the electronic health record as a main reason. Last spring's internal survey had 54 percent of clinicians naming one or more burnout symptoms, and the most common complaint was "pajama time," charting at home after the children are asleep. The chief nursing officer asked the DNP-prepared director of clinical informatics to measure the problem and propose changes.

The question this paper answers is practical: how much time do our clinicians spend in the record, on what tasks, and which changes would return the most time without harming care?

Measuring the Time

Arndt et al. (2017) showed how event logs, the time-stamped records every EHR keeps of each click and screen, can measure clinician work. In a single Wisconsin system, they captured three years of Epic logs for 142 family physicians and checked them against direct observation. Per full-time physician, record time came to 355 minutes each weekday, with 269 of them inside clinic hours and 86 after, in workdays that ran about eleven and a half hours. Clerical and administrative tasks, including documentation, order entry, billing, coding and security, took 44.2 percent of that time, and inbox management took another 23.7 percent.

Our network's informatics team ran the same kind of analysis using the vendor's audit log reports for the past six months. The results were close to the Wisconsin figures: an average of 5.6 hours a day in the record per full-time clinician, with 1.3 hours outside scheduled clinic time. Documentation took 38 percent, inbox work 27 percent and order entry 14 percent. The inbox alone averaged 112 messages a day per clinician, about a third of them automated results notices that required no action.

TaskShare of EHR time in our networkShare in Arndt et al. (2017)
Documentation38 percentPart of 44.2 percent clerical
Inbox27 percent23.7 percent
Order entry14 percentPart of 44.2 percent clerical
Chart review15 percentSeparate category
Other6 percentRemaining categories
What this page is doingThe paper sets the network's own numbers beside a published study. Mentors credit a local measurement checked against outside evidence.
3

Why This Matters for Burnout

Shanafelt et al. (2016) surveyed physicians across all specialties nationally in 2014. Of 6,375 practicing physicians who responded, 84.5 percent used EHRs, and of those for whom it applied, 82.5 percent used computerized order entry. Even with age, sex, specialty, setting and weekly hours taken into account, EHR and order entry users still reported less satisfaction with their clerical time, and order entry carried an added link to burnout. The study was cross-sectional and could not prove that the record caused burnout, but it identified clerical burden as a target for change.

For our network, the link matters because each departing clinician costs months of lost visits and recruitment. Our survey's burnout rate, together with the time we measured outside clinic hours, points to the same problem the national study found.

How We Got Here

The record was not built around clinical work. Adler-Milstein and Jha (2017) asked how much of the jump in hospital EHR use could be credited to the 2009 HITECH law. Comparing hospitals eligible for its incentive payments with those that were not, they found eligible hospitals' annual adoption growth climbed from about three points a year to about fourteen, while ineligible hospitals barely moved, a difference-in-differences of 7.9 points. Ambulatory practices saw a similar push. The act succeeded in spreading electronic records quickly, and the paper argues that the speed came with templates and documentation demands designed around billing and reporting rather than clinicians' workflow, which is the burden our clinicians now carry.

Proposed Changes

The paper proposes four changes, ranked by the time they are expected to return and how quickly they can start.

First, inbox triage. Automated normal results will be routed to a medical assistant queue with standard patient letters, and nurses will approve protocol refills under standing orders. Based on our message mix, this is projected to remove about 35 to 40 messages a day from each clinician's inbox.

Second, team documentation. Medical assistants trained as clinical scribes will enter history, review of systems and orders during visits for clinicians who choose it, starting at two clinics.

Third, template cleanup. The informatics team will remove required fields that exist only for billing or reporting and that are not legally required, after review by compliance.

Fourth, protected time. Each clinician will have thirty minutes of scheduled inbox time in the clinic day.

ChangeExpected effectStart
Inbox triage35 to 40 fewer messages dailyMonth 1
Team documentationLess after-hours chartingMonth 2, two clinics
Template cleanupFewer clicks per noteMonth 3
Protected inbox timeLess home chartingMonth 1
What this page is doingEach change is linked to a measurable effect and a start date. Graders look for a proposal that can be tracked.
4

Measures and Evaluation

The same event log reports will be run every quarter. The primary measure is time in the record outside scheduled hours per clinician per day, with a target of reducing it by half within a year. Secondary measures are inbox volume per clinician, time per note, the burnout survey item, clinician turnover and patient access measured by the third next available appointment. A balancing measure, the rate of abnormal results without documented follow-up within seven days, will make sure triage does not let important results slip.

Risks and Limits

Event logs can overcount time when a chart is left open. Our team will apply the same idle-time rule the Wisconsin study used. Scribes cost money, so their effect on visit volume will be measured before they spread. Staff taking on triage work need training and clear protocols. The paper notes that the burnout evidence is associational and that our own measures will show whether these changes help.

Conclusion

The network's clinicians log 5.6 record hours a day, in line with the Wisconsin figures, and 1.3 of them fall outside scheduled clinic time. A national survey links this clerical load to burnout, and the rapid adoption spurred by federal incentives helps explain why records were built around billing. Inbox triage, team documentation, template cleanup and protected time are proposed, each tracked with the same event logs that revealed the problem, with a balancing measure to protect patient safety.

References

Adler-Milstein, J., & Jha, A. K. (2017). HITECH Act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Affairs, 36(8), 1416-1422. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1651

Arndt, B. G., Beasley, J. W., Watkinson, M. D., Temte, J. L., Tuan, W.-J., Sinsky, C. A., & Gilchrist, V. J. (2017). Tethered to the EHR: Primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Annals of Family Medicine, 15(5), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2121

Shanafelt, T. D., Dyrbye, L. N., Sinsky, C., Hasan, O., Satele, D., Sloan, J., & West, C. P. (2016). Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 91(7), 836-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.007

NUR 8150 Module 1 instructions, in plain terms

Using information systems to improve outcomes for clinicians and patients is the heart of TESU's catalog description of NUR-8150, and with no public syllabus to work from, module one measures the record's burden on clinicians. Expect a DNP systems analysis that states the organizational problem, measures it with the organization's own data such as event logs, compares the findings with published studies, explains causes with evidence, proposes changes ranked by expected effect, sets primary, secondary and balancing measures and names the limits of the data. Some sections ask for a nursing documentation burden study or an analysis of a specific EHR module instead. Check whether your directions want a real or invented organization, a budget, a stakeholder analysis or a project timeline, and follow any required headings exactly.

Inside the NUR 8150 Module 1 example

The invented eight-clinic network, its departing clinicians and its burnout survey open the paper with a clear question. The event log method is explained from the Wisconsin study, and the network's own figures are set beside the published ones in a five-row table. The national survey on clerical burden and burnout explains why the numbers matter, with its cross-sectional limit noted. The HITECH study explains how records came to be built around billing. Four changes are proposed and placed in a four-row table with expected effects and start dates. Primary, secondary and balancing measures follow, then the paper names its risks and limits. Its notes point out the local measurement and why each change can be tracked.

Reading the NUR 8150 Module 1 grading rubric

DNP information systems papers are graded on a clearly stated organizational problem, measurement with the organization's own data, comparison with published evidence, a cause explained with sources, changes proposed with expected effects and timelines, measures that include a balancing measure and an honest account of limits. Mentors credit papers that use event logs or similar system data rather than opinion alone. A balancing measure that protects patient safety is often noted as mature systems thinking. Reporting the design limits of the evidence, such as a cross-sectional survey, shows careful reading. Quote the Arndt, Shanafelt and HITECH figures exactly; APA headings should carry a reader from the network's numbers to the four changes and their tracking.

Common NUR 8150 Module 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them

The most frequent weakness is a proposal with no measurement of the problem; use system data and compare it with published studies. Another is recommending "optimize the EHR" without naming specific changes and their expected effects. Students often forget a balancing measure, which shows that the change does not harm patients. Do not claim that the record causes burnout when the evidence is associational. Give each change a start date and an owner. Address cost and training. The method transfers to your own informatics paper, and a first version built on your brief is free.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More NUR 8150 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers

NUR 8150 Module 1 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 8150 Module 1 sample paper?

The EHR burden paper for an eight-clinic network, from event log data to four proposed changes with measures, is on this page in full.

How much time do primary care physicians spend in the EHR?

Wisconsin family physicians averaged 355 record minutes a weekday, 86 of them after the clinic closed.

What are EHR event logs?

Every EHR silently stamps each click and screen with a time, and those audit trails can be summed to show minutes spent per task.

Is EHR use linked to burnout?

A national survey of 6,375 physicians found that order entry use was linked with higher burnout and EHR use with lower satisfaction with clerical time.

What did the HITECH Act do?

It offered incentive payments for certified records, and eligible hospitals' yearly adoption gains jumped roughly fourfold once payments began.