| Course | MSM-6200 Leading Strategic Change |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Module 4 written assignment: planning and preparing for change |
| Length | About 627 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Master of Science in Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MSM 6200 Module 4
Three Phases and a Gate: Planning and Preparing the Warehouse Change
Student Name
Master of Science in Management, Thomas Edison State University
MSM-6200: Leading Strategic Change
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Three Phases and a Gate: Planning and Preparing the Warehouse Change
Objectives
| Objective | Baseline | Target in 9 months |
|---|---|---|
| Orders shipped before the 4 p.m. cutoff | 94 percent | 97 percent |
| Picker walking time | 41 percent of shift | 25 percent |
| New picker 90-day retention | 55 percent | 75 percent |
| Pick accuracy | 99.5 percent | At least 99.5 percent |
Choosing an Approach
Hayes (2022) contrasts top-down, directive approaches with participative ones and argues that the choice depends on urgency, the nature of the problem and the people affected. Our client's deadline argues for speed, but our turnover problem argues for participation, since pickers who feel imposed upon will leave. The plan combines both: leaders set the objectives and deadline, while pickers and supervisors shape how each phase works. Hayes also notes that participation takes time, so the plan limits it to the questions where pickers' knowledge matters most: where items should sit, how training should run and how the pilot zone should flow. The phases follow the misfits that the congruence diagnosis identified (Nadler & Tushman, 1980).
Three Phases
Reslotting comes first because it costs little, shows results quickly and does not threaten anyone's job. It also tests whether the diagnosis was right.
| Phase | Months | Work | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Reslotting | 1-2 | Move the 300 fastest-moving items near packing; quick win on walking | Inventory manager with two senior pickers |
| 2. Training and pay | 2-4 | Five-day training with a buddy; pay that rewards speed and accuracy together | HR partner and shift supervisors |
| 3. Robot pilot | 4-9 | Autonomous mobile robots in one zone of 40 aisles | Operations manager with IT and six pickers |
Building Readiness
Rafferty et al. (2013) treat readiness as a set of beliefs, that the change is needed, that the organization is able to make it and that it will benefit the people involved, which form in individuals, in groups and across the organization. The plan addresses each. The need is shown with the client's cutoff data, shared on the floor. Capability is shown by the reslotting results. Benefit is shown by the pay redesign and the promise that the pilot will not cost any picker a job.
Preparing Systems and People
IT will test the robots' connection to the warehouse management system in a weekend trial before the pilot. Supervisors will receive two days of training in running a mixed zone. A weekly fifteen-minute meeting on each shift will report progress and collect problems. Supervisors will also practice answering the questions pickers are likely to ask about jobs, so the message is consistent across shifts.
Budget
The plan's costs are modest until the third phase. Reslotting requires about 300 labor hours, scheduled on weekends at overtime rates, roughly $14,000. The training redesign costs about $22,000 in trainer time and paid training days, offset if retention reaches its target, since each picker who leaves within ninety days costs an estimated $4,000 to replace. The robot pilot is leased from the vendor for $9,500 a month, so the six months of phase three cost $57,000 and commit us to nothing beyond the pilot. Leasing rather than buying is part of the plan's logic: it keeps the decision gate real, because walking away from a lease is possible in a way that walking away from a $1.8 million purchase is not.
The Decision Gate
At month nine, a review will decide whether to expand robots to other zones, based on four measures: cutoff performance in the pilot zone, picker retention there, accuracy and pickers' own ratings of working with the robots. The six pickers on the pilot team will present their view at the review.
Conclusion
The plan converts the diagnosis into measurable objectives, a participative approach, three phases with owners and a gate before expansion. Starting with reslotting builds readiness for the harder phases.
References
Hayes, J. (2022). The theory and practice of change management (6th ed.). Bloomsbury.
Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-X
Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457417
MSM 6200 Module 4 instructions, in plain terms
This written assignment covers planning and preparing for change, and it feeds directly into the final project. Expect to set objectives, choose and justify an approach to change, sequence the work with owners and dates, and plan how to build readiness and prepare systems and people. Base the plan on your earlier diagnosis. Use tables for objectives and phases, explain why the sequence makes sense and support your readiness plan with research. Include a point at which leaders will decide whether to continue or expand. Add a budget, even a rough one, since leaders approve plans they can cost. Explain how the sequence protects the organization if an early phase fails, and how readiness will be checked as well as built.
Inside the MSM 6200 Module 4 example
A table of measurable objectives, each with a baseline, comes first. A section chooses an approach that balances urgency and participation. A table sets out three phases with timing, work and owners, and the text explains the first phase's role as a quick win. A readiness section applies a research review's three beliefs. Sections on preparing systems and people and on a decision gate follow, and the conclusion summarizes the plan. A budget section prices each phase and explains why the robots are leased for the pilot, which keeps the later decision gate open. Supervisors' preparation includes practicing consistent answers to pickers' questions about jobs. The conclusion restates how the quick win prepares people for the harder phases.
Where the marks sit in the MSM 6200 Module 4 rubric
Mentors grade this assignment on objectives tied to the diagnosis, a justified approach, a clear sequence with owners and dates, a readiness plan grounded in research and clear writing. Papers that sequence early wins before harder changes show strategic thinking. A decision gate with measures demonstrates that the plan can learn and adjust. Linking readiness to specific actions, rather than general communication, shows practical skill, and tables make the plan easy to evaluate. A budget that supports the plan's logic, such as leasing to keep a decision open, shows the managerial judgment the course rewards. Preparation that covers both systems and people completes the plan.
MSM 6200 Module 4 help: mistakes that cost marks
Students lose points by planning without objectives, by listing tasks without owners or dates or by treating readiness as a single announcement. Others skip the link to their diagnosis. Set objectives with baselines and targets. Explain your approach and sequence. Assign owners. Plan how each readiness belief will be built. Include a decision point. Price the phases, even roughly. Explain what happens if a phase fails, and how the gate protects the organization from a costly commitment. Link each objective to a misfit or gap the diagnosis found, so the plan answers what the evidence showed. A free first sample on your own MSM-6200 planning assignment is available on request.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More MSM 6200 and Master of Science in Management sample papers
- MSM 6200 Module 1: Discussion: Recognizing the Need to Change at a Carteret Warehouse
- MSM 6200 Module 2: Written Assignment: Diagnosing the Warehouse Before Choosing a Fix
- MSM 6200 Module 3: Discussion: Pickers, Supervisors and the Politics of the Robot Pilot
- MSM 6200 Module 5: Discussion: What Leaders Did When the Pilot Stumbled
- MSM 6200 Module 6: Final Project: A Change the Warehouse Should Make, and How to Make It Stick
- ORG 5020 Module 1: Traits, Skills and Behaviors of a New Plant Manager
- ETH 5900 Module 2: Written Assignment: Legal but Wrong? Enron, Accounting Rules and the Law
- FAM 5400 Module 7: Final Project: AT&T and Verizon, a Comparative Financial Analysis
- IOP 5100 Module 9: Written Assignment: Motivating Agents Beyond the Handle-Time Target
MSM 6200 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MSM 6200 Module 4 sample paper?
A three-phase plan with objectives, owners and a decision gate for a warehouse change is the assignment above.
What is change readiness?
People's shared conviction that the change is necessary, that their organization is capable of it and that they stand to benefit.
Why start with a quick win?
It shows results, builds confidence and tests the diagnosis before harder phases begin.
How do directive and participative approaches differ?
Directive approaches are set by leaders; participative approaches involve those affected in shaping the change.
What is a decision gate in a change plan?
A planned review at which leaders decide, based on measures, whether to continue or expand.