FIN 3820 Module 1 Written Assignment: Why Firms and Banks Manage Risk Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This FIN 3820 Module 1 example answers the first written assignment in Risk Management, a course in TESU's B.S.B.A. in Finance. FIN-3820 follows Hull's Risk Management and Financial Institutions, and its first module asks why risk management matters, what kinds of risk financial institutions face and how the function is organized. The paper is written as a first report by the new chief risk officer of Pine Barrens Community Bank, a composite $1.2 billion bank in southern New Jersey, to its board. It explains the risk-return trade-off and the difference between systematic and idiosyncratic risk, argues why a bank should manage risk even though shareholders can diversify, classifies the bank's exposures and proposes how its risk function should be organized.

CourseFIN-3820 Risk Management
ModuleModule 1
Paper typeWritten assignment 1: introduction to risk management
LengthAbout 518 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramB.S.B.A. in Finance
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for FIN 3820 Module 1

1

Why Manage Risk at All? A First Report to a Community Bank's Board

Student Name

B.S.B.A. in Finance, Thomas Edison State University

FIN-3820: Risk Management

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title poses the question the paper answers for directors who ask why diversified shareholders need the bank to manage risk. The bank is a composite.
2

Why Manage Risk at All? A First Report to a Community Bank's Board

Risk and Return

Investors demand higher expected returns for bearing more risk, but only for risk they cannot eliminate by diversifying. Systematic risk, tied to the economy as a whole, cannot be diversified away; idiosyncratic risk, specific to one firm, can (Hull, 2023). By this logic, a diversified shareholder in Pine Barrens should not care about risks unique to the bank, which raises the board's natural question: why spend money managing them?

Why Manage Risk Anyway

The answer lies in costs that diversification does not remove. Froot et al. (1993) showed that when outside financing is costly, a firm whose internal cash flow drops may have to pass up profitable investments; hedging protects the cash it needs to keep investing. Stulz (1996) argued that the main purpose of risk management is to reduce the probability of costly financial distress, not to eliminate all variability. For a bank, those distress costs are severe: a loss that pushes capital below regulatory minimums can force asset sales at depressed prices, restrict lending and, through loss of depositor confidence, threaten survival. Taxes, debt covenants and the bank's franchise value with customers add further reasons. Risk management therefore creates value by keeping the bank far from the point where distress costs begin.

What this page is doingAnswering the diversification objection directly with the two leading arguments, costly external finance and distress costs, is the reasoning this first module asks students to master.
3

The Bank's Risks

Credit and interest rate risk are the bank's largest exposures. About 38 percent of loans are commercial real estate, concentrated in the bank's own region, and most of its mortgages carry fixed rates while its deposits can reprice within months.

RiskPine Barrens examplePrimary measure
Credit riskCommercial real estate and small business loans could defaultExpected loss, credit concentration
Market and interest rate riskFixed-rate mortgages funded by deposits that reprice quicklyRepricing gap, duration gap, economic value of equity
Liquidity riskLarge depositors could withdraw quicklyLiquidity coverage, deposit concentration
Operational riskFraud, cyberattack, processing failuresLoss events, scenario analysis
Model riskErrors in the credit loss and rate risk modelsValidation and backtesting

Organizing the Risk Function

Three lines of defense. The business lines that make loans and take deposits own their risks and operate controls; an independent risk management and compliance function sets limits, measures risk and challenges the business; internal audit provides independent assurance to the board.

Risk appetite. The board should approve a written statement of how much risk the bank will take to meet its goals, expressed in measurable limits: for example, commercial real estate no more than 300 percent of capital, a loss of no more than 15 percent of economic value of equity from a 200-basis-point rate shock and a minimum liquidity buffer.

Reporting. A quarterly risk report to the board's risk committee should show each measure against its limit, with any breach explained.

Conclusion

Risk management is not about avoiding risk; banks earn their returns by taking it. It is about taking the risks the board chooses, in amounts the bank can survive, and knowing at all times where it stands. The next reports will measure interest rate, market and credit risk in detail.

References

Froot, K. A., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1993). Risk management: Coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1629-1658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05123.x

Hull, J. C. (2023). Risk management and financial institutions (6th ed.). Wiley.

Stulz, R. M. (1996). Rethinking risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9(3), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1996.tb00295.x

FIN 3820 Module 1 instructions, in plain terms

Each FIN-3820 module has an assignment, eight in all, together 30 percent. Module 1, Introduction to Risk Management, covers the risk-return trade-off, systematic and idiosyncratic risk, the reasons firms manage risk and the risks financial institutions face. The prompts ask you to explain each idea and then use it on a real institution. Hull's textbook is the main source, supported by research. The community bank and its figures here are composites. Expect questions on why risk management can add value when, in theory, shareholders could diversify risk themselves, and on how banks and nonfinancial firms organize the risk function. Some versions ask how the risk function should be organized and who it reports to.

Inside the FIN 3820 Module 1 example

The paper is framed as a report to a bank's board. It explains the risk-return trade-off and why diversified shareholders seem not to need risk management, then answers that objection with research on costly external finance and distress costs. A table classifies the bank's risks with an example and a measure for each. The organization section sets out the three lines of defense, a risk appetite statement with sample limits and board reporting, and a short conclusion previews the measurements to come. The answer separates the reasons that apply to banks from those that apply to other firms, which keeps the arguments precise. A closing paragraph describes how the bank's risk function should report to the board.

Reading the FIN 3820 Module 1 grading rubric

Credit for the opening risk set depends on tying each concept to an actual bank or insurer. Mentors look for accurate explanations of risk and return and of systematic versus idiosyncratic risk, a reasoned answer to why firms manage risk and a clear classification of an institution's risks. Supporting the argument with research beyond the textbook and applying it to a specific institution earn the strongest marks. Clear organization, as in a professional report, helps. Mentors give credit for naming the specific frictions, such as costly distress, taxes and expensive outside financing, that make hedging valuable, and for applying them to a firm. Clear structure, with each argument in its own paragraph, helps.

Common FIN 3820 Module 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them

First-module answers lose points for saying firms manage risk to reduce volatility without explaining why that creates value, for listing risk types without examples and for describing risk management as avoiding risk. Answer the diversification objection with specific arguments. Give each risk type a concrete example and a way to measure it. Describe how the function is organized and who owns what. A free first sample of your own FIN-3820 Module 1 assignment is available on request. Explain why the value of hedging depends on market imperfections, and give an example of a firm for which each argument holds. Use one bank and one company as your examples throughout.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More FIN 3820 and B.S.B.A. in Finance sample papers

FIN 3820 Module 1 questions, answered

Where can I find a free FIN 3820 Module 1 sample paper?

The community bank report above explains why firms manage risk, classifies a bank's risks and proposes three lines of defense and a risk appetite statement.

Why do firms manage risk if shareholders can diversify?

Because volatile cash flows can force firms to pass up good investments and raise the chance of costly financial distress.

What is the difference between systematic and idiosyncratic risk?

Systematic risk affects the whole market and cannot be diversified away; idiosyncratic risk is specific to one firm and can be.

What are the three lines of defense?

Business lines that own risks, an independent risk and compliance function that oversees them and internal audit that gives independent assurance.

What textbook does FIN-3820 use?

Hull's Risk Management and Financial Institutions, sixth edition.