FDR 4400 Module 3 Written Assignment: Special Events, Planned Giving and Capital Campaigns Compared Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This FDR 4400 Module 3 example answers a written assignment on special events, planned giving and capital campaigns for Fundraising for Nonprofits in TESU's B.S.B.A. in Finance. FDR-4400's written assignments, unlike its organization assignments, test understanding of course concepts in general rather than through the student's chosen nonprofit. This one compares three fundraising vehicles that differ sharply in cost, timing and the relationships they build, and explains how an organization prepares for a capital campaign. The paper draws on Weinstein and Barden's textbook and research on giving, uses a gift range chart to show how campaign goals are structured and explains why campaigns raise most of their money privately before going public.

CourseFDR-4400 Fundraising for Nonprofits
ModuleModule 3
Paper typeWritten assignment: special events, planned giving and capital campaigns
LengthAbout 698 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramB.S.B.A. in Finance
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for FDR 4400 Module 3

1

Galas, Bequests and Buildings: Comparing Three Fundraising Vehicles

Student Name

B.S.B.A. in Finance, Thomas Edison State University

FDR-4400: Fundraising for Nonprofits

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names one familiar example of each vehicle the paper compares.
2

Galas, Bequests and Buildings: Comparing Three Fundraising Vehicles

Three Vehicles, Three Purposes

Special events

Galas, walks, golf outings and similar events bring supporters together, create visibility and often attract people who would not respond to a letter. Their weakness is cost. Weinstein and Barden (2017) note that events are among the most expensive ways to raise money once staff time is counted, commonly costing 50 cents or more for each dollar raised, and that their value lies as much in cultivation and recognition as in net revenue. An event works best when it is followed up: a guest who enjoyed the evening needs to hear about the program's results afterward, or the relationship ends at the door.

Planned giving

Planned gifts are arranged now but usually received later, most often bequests in a will, along with gifts of retirement assets, charitable gift annuities and charitable remainder trusts. They cost little to promote, can be very large relative to a donor's lifetime giving and often come from loyal, modest donors rather than the wealthy. Their drawback is time: an organization may wait years or decades for the money. Planned giving therefore suits organizations confident they will exist for the long term and willing to invest in relationships whose payoff they may not see soon.

Capital campaigns

A capital campaign raises a large sum within a set period for a specific purpose, usually a building, major equipment or an endowment. It concentrates the attention of board, staff and donors, and its deadline and concrete goal motivate gifts larger than donors' annual giving. It is also demanding, typically running three to five years and requiring leadership gifts that most organizations do not receive in normal years.

VehicleTypical cost per dollar raisedTime to revenueRelationship built
Special eventsHighImmediateBroad but shallow, unless followed up
Planned givingLowYears to decadesDeep, with loyal donors
Capital campaignModerateThree to five yearsIntense, with leadership donors
What this page is doingComparing the vehicles on the same three dimensions in one table lets the reader see the trade-offs at once, which is the analysis the assignment asks for rather than three separate descriptions.
3

Preparing for a Capital Campaign

Case and feasibility

A campaign begins with a compelling case for the specific project and a feasibility study, usually conducted by a consultant who interviews 30 to 50 likely donors confidentially. The study tests whether the case persuades, whether leadership donors exist and at what level and whether the goal is realistic. Organizations that skip this step risk announcing goals they cannot reach.

Leadership

Board members must give first and generously, since donors ask whether those closest to the organization have committed. A campaign chair with standing and connections leads the volunteer effort.

The gift range chart

Campaigns depend on a small number of very large gifts. A common rule of thumb holds that the top gift should equal 10 to 20 percent of the goal and that roughly the top dozen gifts provide half or more of the total.

The chart shows why prospect research matters: an organization needs about three serious prospects for every gift at the top levels.

Gift level, $2 million goalGifts neededProspects neededTotal
$300,00013$300,000
$150,00026$300,000
$75,000412$300,000
$40,000824$320,000
$20,0001545$300,000
$10,0002575$250,000
Under $10,000ManyMany$230,000
Total|$2,000,000

The quiet phase

Most campaigns raise half or more of the goal privately, from board and leadership donors, before announcing it publicly. Research supports the practice. In a field experiment with a university capital campaign, List and Lucking-Reiley (2002) found that donations rose sharply when donors were told that a larger share of the goal had already been raised as seed money. A public launch with momentum invites broader giving; a launch at 10 percent invites doubt.

Choosing Among the Vehicles

The three vehicles are not alternatives so much as parts of a whole program. Events widen the circle and identify new supporters; annual giving keeps them engaged; capital campaigns ask the most committed for transformational gifts; and planned giving offers loyal donors a way to make their largest gift of all. Andreoni (1990) showed that people give partly for the satisfaction of giving itself, a "warm glow," which suggests that each vehicle should make that satisfaction visible, by showing donors what their gift accomplished.

References

Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133

List, J. A., & Lucking-Reiley, D. (2002). The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1086/324392

Weinstein, S., & Barden, P. (2017). The complete guide to fundraising management (4th ed.). Wiley.

What the FDR 4400 Module 3 instructions ask for

FDR-4400 has three written assignments, worth 10 percent of the grade together, which assess learning beyond the chosen nonprofit. It fits the module on events, planned gifts and capital campaigns, including how to size up donors and get ready for a campaign. Expect to explain and compare vehicles and describe campaign preparation, citing the textbook and research. Because written assignments are not tied to your organization, general examples are appropriate here. Unlike the organization assignments, this one tests the concepts in general terms, comparing fundraising vehicles on purpose, cost and fit. Use examples from real organizations where possible. Some versions ask which vehicle suits a small organization best and why.

How this FDR 4400 Module 3 example is built

The paper describes each vehicle under its own heading, then compares all three on cost, timing and relationship in a single table. The capital campaign section sets out the preparation in order: case and feasibility study, leadership, a gift range chart worked for a $2 million goal and the quiet phase, supported by field experiment evidence on seed money. A closing section explains how the vehicles fit together in one program and connects them to research on why people give. The comparison ends with guidance on choosing among the vehicles for a given organization. A short section explains the readiness a campaign requires.

Reading the FDR 4400 Module 3 grading rubric

Written assignments are a tenth of the grade. Mentors look for accurate explanations of each vehicle, a genuine comparison rather than three separate descriptions and a correct account of capital campaign preparation, the sixth course objective. Supporting claims with the textbook and research, and using tools such as a gift range chart, show depth. Because these assignments stand apart from the organization work, clarity and accuracy on concepts matter most. Mentors give credit for accurate descriptions of each vehicle and for a clear account of when each fits. Comparisons that weigh cost against return show judgment. Papers that size a capital campaign from a feasibility study and a gift range chart, rather than from the building's cost alone, show campaign planning in practice.

FDR 4400 Module 3 help from the desk

Papers in this module lose credit for describing events, planned giving and campaigns separately without comparing them, for treating a capital campaign as a bigger annual appeal and for skipping feasibility and the quiet phase. Compare the vehicles on the same dimensions. Show how a campaign goal breaks into gift levels. Explain why campaigns raise most of the goal before going public. End with how the vehicles work together. A free first sample of your own FDR-4400 Module 3 assignment is available on request. Explain the costs and preparation each vehicle requires, not only its potential returns. Use one example per vehicle. Note the risks of each vehicle, such as event costs that eat into net revenue.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More FDR 4400 and B.S.B.A. in Finance sample papers

FDR 4400 Module 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free FDR 4400 Module 3 sample paper?

The paper above compares special events, planned giving and capital campaigns and explains campaign preparation with a gift range chart and evidence on the quiet phase.

What is a gift range chart?

A table showing how many gifts at each level a campaign needs to reach its goal, and how many prospects are required for each gift.

Why do capital campaigns have a quiet phase?

Raising much of the goal privately first gives the public launch credibility, and research shows donors give more when more has already been raised.

What is planned giving?

Gifts arranged now and usually received later, such as bequests, gift annuities and charitable remainder trusts.

Are special events cost-effective?

Often not on net revenue alone; their value lies in cultivating new supporters, which requires follow-up.