| Course | DBA-8010 The Global Business Context Trends, Issues, and Markets |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Module 3 written assignment: foreign exchange markets |
| Length | About 517 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DBA 8010 Module 3
Euros In, Euros Out: Building a Currency Policy Before Signing a European Contract
Student Name
Doctor of Business Administration, Thomas Edison State University
DBA-8010: The Global Business Context: Trends, Issues, and Markets
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Euros In, Euros Out: Building a Currency Policy Before Signing a European Contract
The Contract
Our beverage customer will pay in euros for colors supplied to its European plants: about 4.2 million euros a year for three years. Our costs for that business will be partly in euros, the toll processor's fees and European raw materials, about 2.6 million euros a year, and partly in dollars, our technical staff and formula ingredients shipped from New Jersey.
How Exchange Rates Are Set and Quoted
De Kluyver (2012) explains that exchange rates are prices set in a global market where banks, firms and investors trade currencies, influenced by interest rate differences, inflation, trade flows and expectations. Rates are quoted as the price of one currency in another; a quote of 1.08 dollars per euro means a euro buys 1.08 dollars. Spot rates apply to immediate exchange; forward rates, set today for future exchange, differ from spot mainly by the interest rate gap between the two currencies.
Our Exposure
Bartram et al. (2010) studied why measured exchange rate exposure is often smaller than expected and found that firms reduce it through pass-through of currency changes to prices, operational hedging such as matching foreign costs and revenues, and financial hedging. Each lever is available to us.
| Exposure | Source | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction | Euro receivables from the customer, net of euro payments to the toll processor | About 1.6 million euros a year |
| Economic | Competing against European color makers whose costs are in euros; a weak euro makes their prices lower in dollars | Hard to measure; affects future margins |
| Translation | None yet, since we have no European subsidiary | Would arise if we later acquire one |
Operational Hedge
The toll processing contract is itself a hedge. Paying 2.6 million euros a year to the Dutch processor offsets most of our euro revenue, cutting net exposure from 4.2 to about 1.6 million euros. If we later buy European raw materials directly, the offset grows.
Financial Hedge Policy
Layering hedges, more for near months and less for later months, smooths results while leaving room for forecast changes, since our euro volume depends on the customer's orders. Evidence from Allayannis and Ofek (2001) shows derivative users carrying less exchange rate exposure, which supports hedging of this kind as risk management rather than a bet.
| Element | Policy |
|---|---|
| What to hedge | Net euro exposure after operational offsets |
| How much | 75 percent of the next six months' expected net exposure; 50 percent of months seven to twelve |
| Instrument | Forward contracts with our bank; options only with board approval |
| Review | Quarterly by the finance committee |
| Prohibited | Speculative positions unrelated to business flows |
Pricing
The contract allows a price review if the euro moves more than 8 percent in either direction, sharing large currency swings with the customer, a form of pass-through.
Conclusion
Before signing a euro contract, the firm should understand how rates are set, measure its net exposure, use its euro costs as a natural hedge and adopt a written policy for hedging what remains. Together, operations, financial contracts and pricing terms can keep a currency swing from erasing the contract's margin.
References
Allayannis, G., & Ofek, E. (2001). Exchange rate exposure, hedging, and the use of foreign currency derivatives. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 273-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00050-4
Bartram, S. M., Brown, G. W., & Minton, B. A. (2010). Resolving the exposure puzzle: The many facets of exchange rate exposure. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(2), 148-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.09.002
De Kluyver, C. A. (2012). Fundamentals of global strategy. Saylor Academy.
DBA 8010 Module 3 instructions, in plain terms
This written assignment covers foreign exchange markets. Expect to explain how exchange rates are determined and quoted, identify the kinds of exposure a firm faces, and recommend how to manage them through operations, financial hedges and contract terms. Quantify exposure where you can, distinguish gross from net exposure, and write a policy rather than a single hedging decision, since policies guide many decisions over time. Distinguish gross exposure from net exposure after natural offsets, and write the policy with amounts, instruments, limits and a review schedule. Explain how forward rates relate to interest rates. Keep the policy short enough to use. State your policy's limits in writing.
Inside the DBA 8010 Module 3 example
The paper describes a euro contract and the firm's euro costs. A section explains how rates are set and quoted. A table identifies transaction, economic and translation exposure, and research on exposure explains how firms reduce it. Sections show the toll contract as an operational hedge, set a layered hedging policy in a table and add a pricing clause. The conclusion combines the three levers. A pricing clause that shares large currency swings with the customer adds a third lever beside operational and financial hedges, and research on derivatives use supports hedging as risk reduction. A table separates transaction, economic and translation exposure and sizes each where possible. A layered schedule hedges more of the near months than the later ones. An operational hedge cuts net exposure from 4.2 to about 1.6 million euros.
DBA 8010 Module 3 rubric: what earns full marks
The marks follow four things: currency concepts explained correctly, exposure found and sized accurately, a workable hedging policy and writing fit for a doctorate. Papers that net operational offsets before financial hedging show sophistication. A written policy with limits and review shows governance. Linking currency management to earlier strategic choices demonstrates integration. Combining three levers, operations, contracts and financial hedges, shows a complete approach to currency risk. A prohibition on speculation shows sound governance. Explaining how exchange rates are quoted and set, before measuring exposure, shows command of the basics a policy rests on. A policy table with amounts, instruments and review dates shows readiness for real use.
Common DBA 8010 Module 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Students lose points by hedging gross rather than net exposure, by confusing transaction and translation exposure or by recommending a single trade instead of a policy. Others ignore operational hedges. Net out natural offsets. Distinguish the types of exposure. Write a policy with amounts, instruments and review. Consider pricing terms. Use contract terms, such as price review clauses, alongside financial hedges. Measure net exposure first, then hedge only what remains after natural offsets. Review the policy every quarter. A free first sample on your own DBA-8010 foreign exchange assignment is available on request. Show the euro exposure in dollars at two exchange rates so the size of the risk is plain.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DBA 8010 and Doctor of Business Administration sample papers
- DBA 8010 Module 1: Written Assignment: Globalization Drivers for a Natural Food Color Maker
- DBA 8010 Module 2: Discussion: Exporting, a Toll Processor or an Acquisition in Europe
- DBA 8010 Module 4: Written Assignment: Standardize or Adapt the Marketing of Natural Colors
- DBA 8010 Module 5: Discussion: Negotiating a Supply Agreement With a Japanese Confectioner
- DBA 8010 Module 6: Written Assignment: Recruiting a Technical Sales Manager for Europe
- DBA 8010 Module 7: Discussion: Labor Conditions on a Purple Carrot Farm
- DBA 8010 Module 8: Final Project: Two Export Plans, Natural Colors to Germany and Color Lab Services to Mexico
- DBA 8000 Module 2: Written Assignment: The Traps Hidden in the Core Lab Decision
- DBA 8070 Module 4: Written Assignment: A Compliance and Ethics Program Built for a 140-Person Shop
- DBA 8030 Module 2: Case Study: Transformational Leadership After a Bank Merger
- DBA 8050 Module 2: Article Analysis: Blanka's Review of Intrapreneurship and a Native Plant Program
DBA 8010 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DBA 8010 Module 3 sample paper?
A currency policy for a natural color maker's euro contract is in the assignment above.
What determines exchange rates?
Supply and demand in currency markets, influenced by interest rates, inflation, trade flows and expectations.
What is an operational hedge?
Reducing currency exposure by matching foreign revenues with costs in the same currency.
Why layer hedges over time?
Hedging more of near-term exposure and less of later exposure smooths results while allowing for forecast changes.
What is the difference between transaction and economic exposure?
Transaction exposure affects specific foreign currency amounts; economic exposure affects long-term competitiveness.