| Course | ACC-5010 Principles of Forensic Accounting |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Case study answers on business valuation |
| Length | About 955 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Master of Science in Accounting |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ACC 5010 Module 6
What the Boatyard Is Worth: Valuing a Closely Held Business for Equitable Distribution
Student Name
Master of Science in Accounting, Thomas Edison State University
ACC-5010: Principles of Forensic Accounting
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
What the Boatyard Is Worth: Valuing a Closely Held Business for Equitable Distribution
The Case
Hopatcong Marine Services, a composite business on Lake Hopatcong, stores about 400 boats over the winter and repairs engines and hulls year round. It is a corporation owned 100 percent by one spouse, who founded it during the marriage. The other spouse's attorney retained a forensic accountant to value the business as of the date the divorce complaint was filed. The yard reported pretax income of $310,000 last year, and the owner drew a salary of $260,000.
Question 1: What standard of value applies?
The standard of value determines what question the valuation answers. Tax cases usually ask for fair market value, the price an imaginary buyer and seller would agree on if both knew the facts and neither had to deal. Courts in divorce cases often apply a version of fair value, which seeks a fair result between the parties and may not apply discounts that a hypothetical buyer would demand. New Jersey courts value businesses for equitable distribution with an eye to fairness between spouses, and the premise of value is a going concern, since the owner intends to keep operating the yard (Crain et al., 2019). The valuation date also matters: here it is the filing date of the complaint, so growth the owner creates afterward through his own efforts generally belongs to him alone, and the expert should not build later results into the value.
Question 2: What are normalized earnings?
Reported earnings in a closely held company often reflect the owner's choices more than the business's economics. Normalization adjusts them to what a typical owner-operator would report.
| Adjustment | Reason | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Reported pretax income | Tax return and financial statements | $310,000 |
| Owner's salary above market | Owner paid $260,000; a yard manager would cost about $140,000 | +120,000 |
| Personal expenses run through the business | Family vehicle lease and a lake house utility bill | +18,000 |
| One-time insurance gain from a storm claim | Not expected to recur | (25,000) |
| Normalized pretax income | | $423,000 | |
| Income taxes at a combined 27% | Hypothetical buyer's tax burden | (114,210) |
| Normalized net income | | $308,790 |
Question 3: What is the value under the income approach?
The capitalization method turns a single year of expected earnings into a value by dividing it by a rate that reflects risk net of growth. The discount rate is built up from components: a risk-free rate of 4.5%, an equity risk premium of 5.5%, a size premium of 5.0% for a very small company and a company-specific premium of 6.0% for dependence on the owner, seasonal revenue and a single location, totaling 21%. Subtracting long-term growth of 3% gives a capitalization rate of 18%. Next year's expected earnings are $308,790 x 1.03 = $318,054, and the value is $318,054 / 0.18 = $1,766,967, or about $1,767,000.
Question 4: What does the market approach indicate?
Transactions in small marine service businesses compiled in private sale databases suggest prices around 4.5 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Normalized EBITDA is $423,000 of pretax income plus $60,000 of depreciation and $15,000 of interest, or $498,000. At 4.5 times, enterprise value is $2,241,000. Subtracting $300,000 of debt gives an equity value of $1,941,000. The market approach depends on how comparable the sample transactions are, and few involve lakefront yards with storage capacity this large.
Question 5: How should the values be reconciled?
The income approach receives more weight because it rests on the yard's own normalized results, while the market approach depends on transactions of uncertain comparability. The reconciled value is about $1.84 million.
| Approach | Indicated value | Weight | Weighted value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income: capitalization of earnings | $1,766,967 | 60% | $1,060,180 |
| Market: EBITDA multiple | 1,941,000 | 40% | 776,400 |
| Reconciled value | | | $1,836,580 |
Question 6: Should discounts apply, and how is goodwill treated?
A hypothetical buyer of a private company pays less than for a comparable public one because the shares cannot be sold quickly; Officer (2007) found that acquirers paid substantially less for unlisted targets than for comparable public ones, consistent with a discount for lack of liquidity. New Jersey's courts, however, have held that a marketability discount should ordinarily not be applied in equitable distribution when no sale is contemplated, absent extraordinary circumstances, as in Brown v. Brown (2002). Because the owner will keep the yard, no discount is applied here. On goodwill, New Jersey has treated the goodwill of a business built during the marriage as distributable property, a principle established for professional practices in Dugan v. Dugan (1983). Part of Hopatcong Marine's value reflects the owner's personal relationships with boat owners; the expert should explain whether and how that personal element is separated from enterprise goodwill under the law that applies.
Question 7: How should the expert report and defend the value?
The report should state the standard and premise of value, the valuation date, every document relied on, each normalization adjustment with its support, the derivation of the discount rate and the reasons for the weights given to each approach. It should present a sensitivity table showing how the value changes if the company-specific premium moves from 4% to 8% or growth from 2% to 4%, since opposing experts usually attack those two inputs. At trial, the owner's expert will likely argue for a lower value by treating more of the goodwill as personal, by raising the company-specific risk for the owner's central role and by citing the yard's dependence on one lake. The forensic accountant's defense is documentation: customer lists showing how many boat owners have stored there for more than five years, a manager capable of running daily operations and the published sources for each rate. A value that is transparent and reproducible is harder to discredit than one that is merely plausible.
References
Brown v. Brown, 348 N.J. Super. 466, 792 A.2d 463 (App. Div. 2002).
Crain, M. A., Hopwood, W. S., Gendler, R. S., Young, G. R., & Pacini, C. (2019). Essentials of forensic accounting (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Dugan v. Dugan, 92 N.J. 423, 457 A.2d 1 (1983).
Officer, M. S. (2007). The price of corporate liquidity: Acquisition discounts for unlisted targets. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(3), 571-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.004
What the ACC 5010 Module 6 instructions ask for
Module 6, Business Valuation, closes ACC-5010 and supplies one of the eight case studies that make up 22 percent of the grade. The module covers why forensic accountants value businesses, in divorces, shareholder disputes, damages cases and estates; the standards and premises of value; the income, market and asset approaches; normalization of earnings; and discounts and premiums. Case study questions here typically give financial information for a closely held company and ask you to choose a standard of value, normalize earnings, apply at least two approaches, reconcile them and address discounts. This sample answers six such questions for an invented boatyard in a New Jersey divorce; your case will specify its own facts and jurisdiction.
Inside the ACC 5010 Module 6 example
The answers open with the case facts, then take six questions in the order a valuation report would. The first explains the standard and premise of value and why the divorce setting matters. A normalization table adjusts reported earnings line by line with a reason for each change. The income approach builds a discount rate from four components and capitalizes next year's earnings, with the arithmetic shown. The market approach applies an EBITDA multiple and notes its limits. A reconciliation table weights the two indications and explains the weights. The last answer contrasts the economic evidence for a marketability discount with New Jersey case law and addresses goodwill.
Reading the ACC 5010 Module 6 grading rubric
The valuation case is the last of the eight case studies that share 22 percent of the grade. On a valuation case, mentors look for the right standard of value for the context, normalization adjustments that are explained and supported, a discount rate whose components are identified, correct capitalization arithmetic, a market approach that acknowledges comparability limits and a reasoned reconciliation. Treating discounts in light of the applicable law, not only finance theory, shows command of the forensic setting. Tables that show every calculation make the work verifiable. Answers slip most when an adjustment has no support or when one approach stands alone with nothing to check it.
Common ACC 5010 Module 6 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Valuation answers go wrong most often in normalization and in the capitalization step. Explain every adjustment with a reason and an amount a skeptical opposing expert would accept. Remember that capitalization divides next year's expected earnings by the capitalization rate, which is the discount rate minus growth, so grow current earnings by one year first. Use at least two approaches and reconcile them with stated weights. Check the jurisdiction's law on discounts and goodwill before applying them, since divorce valuations differ from tax valuations. Show the arithmetic in tables. If you would like your own valuation case worked in this format, a writer can do it from your course materials, beginning with a free first sample.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More ACC 5010 and Master of Science in Accounting sample papers
- ACC 5010 Module 1: Short Paper: What a Forensic Accountant Brings
- ACC 5010 Module 2: Case Study: The Forensic Accountant in Court
- ACC 5010 Module 3: Short Paper: A Kickback Scheme and Its Controls
- ACC 5010 Module 4: Final Project: Forensic Strategy After a Cyberattack
- ACC 5010 Module 5: Short Paper: Luckin Coffee's Fabricated Sales
- ACC 5070 Module 4: Written Assignment: Water Utility and Debt Service Funds
- ACC 6050 Module 3: Written Assignment: Decision Usefulness or Stewardship?
- ACC 6070 Module 2: Written Assignment: Database Design and Documentation
- ACC 6040 Module 8: Course Project: Statements and a Public Company Analysis
ACC 5010 Module 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free ACC 5010 Module 6 sample paper?
The boatyard valuation case is answered in full above: standard of value, normalized earnings, the income and market approaches, reconciliation and New Jersey's treatment of discounts and goodwill.
What is the difference between fair market value and fair value?
Fair market value is the price between a hypothetical willing buyer and seller; fair value, used in many divorce and shareholder cases, seeks fairness between the parties and may exclude some discounts.
How do you normalize earnings for a small business valuation?
Adjust reported income for above- or below-market owner compensation, personal expenses paid by the business and nonrecurring items, then apply a typical buyer's tax rate.
How is a capitalization rate calculated?
Build a discount rate from the risk-free rate, equity risk premium, size premium and company-specific risk, then subtract expected long-term growth.
Does New Jersey apply marketability discounts in divorce?
New Jersey courts have held that marketability discounts should ordinarily not be applied in equitable distribution when no sale is contemplated, absent extraordinary circumstances.