PSY 3790 Module 6 Gender and Relationships Paper: Gender Similarities, Marital Interaction and Online Dating Example

Reviewed by Dorcas Lindqvist, MA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

Gender and close relationships close the course in this PSY 3790 Module 6 sample paper, in which Kayla Nguyen, the invented TESU psychology student and tenant organizer, recently engaged after meeting her partner on a dating app, wonders what research says about men, women and lasting love. The paper examines Hyde's synthesis of 46 meta-analyses, which found most psychological gender gaps small or negligible, Gottman and Levenson's study in which couples whose negative exchanges outweighed positive ones were more likely to consider separation years later and Finkel and colleagues' review concluding that online dating expands access to partners but that matching algorithms have little evidence behind them. Lessons for her own relationship close this PSY-3790 paper.

CoursePSY-3790 Social Psychology
ModuleModule 6
Paper typeWritten assignment: gender and relationships
LengthAbout 1,001 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramBachelor of Arts in Psychology
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PSY 3790 Module 6

1

More Alike Than Different: Gender, Conflict and Finding a Partner

Student Name

Bachelor of Arts in Psychology, Thomas Edison State University

PSY-3790: Social Psychology

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title summarizes the gender similarities hypothesis and points to the paper's other topics, how couples handle conflict and how people meet.
2

More Alike Than Different: Gender, Conflict and Finding a Partner

Introduction

I met my fiancé through a dating app two years ago. Friends now offer advice drawn from popular books about how men and women are fundamentally different, and some warn that relationships that start online do not last. As this course ends, I wanted to know what social psychology actually says about gender differences, what predicts whether relationships last and whether online dating helps people find good partners.

Sex, Gender and Social Roles

Psychologists distinguish sex, biological characteristics, from gender, the roles, behaviors and identities a culture associates with being a woman or a man. Social role theory proposes that many observed differences between women and men arise from the different roles they have historically occupied, such as caregiving or paid work, and from the expectations those roles create.

How Different Are Men and Women?

Hyde (2005) brought together 46 meta-analyses comparing women and men covering cognitive abilities, communication, personality, well-being and motor behavior. She found that most differences were small or close to zero: about three quarters of the effects fell in those ranges. Exceptions included some motor behaviors, such as throwing distance, some aspects of sexuality and physical aggression, which showed moderate to large differences. She also noted that the size of differences often varied with context and age. She proposed the gender similarities hypothesis: men and women are similar on most psychological variables, and overstating differences can cause harm, for example by discouraging girls from math or men from expressing emotion.

What Predicts Whether Relationships Last

Gottman and Levenson (1992) observed 73 married couples discussing a problem in their marriage, coding each partner's positive and negative behaviors and measuring their physiological responses. Couples were classified as "regulated" if both partners showed more positive than negative behavior over the conversation and "nonregulated" if not. Four years later, nonregulated couples had lower marital satisfaction, were more likely to have considered divorce and were more likely to have separated. They also reported poorer health. Negative behaviors such as criticism, defensiveness, contempt and withdrawal were especially damaging.

Online Dating

Finkel et al. (2012) reviewed research on online dating from the perspective of psychological science. They concluded that online dating offers a real advantage in access, letting people meet many potential partners they would not otherwise encounter, and that online communication before meeting can sometimes be helpful. However, browsing large numbers of profiles can lead people to treat partners as commodities and to make poorer choices, and profiles capture little of what predicts compatibility. Most importantly, they found no compelling evidence that matching algorithms based on personality or similarity predict long-term relationship success better than chance, since the factors that best predict relationship quality, such as how couples interact and handle stress, cannot be known before two people meet.

SourceKey findingLesson for my relationship
Hyde (2005)Most psychological gender differences are small or near zeroDo not assume we think differently because of gender
Gottman and Levenson (1992)Couples with more negative than positive interaction were likelier to separateWatch how we handle conflict
Finkel et al. (2012)Online dating aids access, but algorithms lack evidenceHow we met matters less than how we interact
What this page is doingThe table links each finding to a personal lesson. Mentors credit papers that apply research to life while keeping the evidence accurate.
3

Applying the Research to My Relationship

Hyde's findings suggest that popular claims about men and women being from different worlds overstate the case; my fiancé and I differ more as individuals than as a man and a woman. Gottman and Levenson's research suggests that the way we handle disagreements, keeping positive interactions well ahead of negative ones and avoiding contempt, matters more for our future than how we met. Finkel and colleagues' review suggests that the app helped us meet but did not predict our compatibility; that depends on how we treat each other.

Relationships Beyond Romance

The same principles apply to other close relationships, including friendships and the bonds among neighbors that make our tenants' association work. Positive interaction, responsiveness and fair treatment build lasting ties in every setting.

Gender in Community Organizing

In our association, I noticed that women do most of the organizing work while men more often speak at meetings. Social role theory suggests that these patterns reflect expectations rather than fixed differences, and our association now rotates roles so that everyone both speaks and organizes.

Attraction

Research on attraction finds that proximity, similarity and familiarity draw people together. Neighbors who live close and see each other often are more likely to become friends, which helps explain why floor-based committees build stronger ties than building-wide ones.

Love Over Time

Passionate love, intense longing and physical attraction, tends to decline over the years, while companionate love, deep friendship and commitment, can grow. Couples who expect this change and invest in shared activities and responsiveness tend to sustain satisfaction.

Responsiveness

Research on relationships highlights responsiveness, the sense that a partner understands, values and cares for you. Small daily acts of responsiveness build trust.

Gender and Leadership

Women leaders sometimes face a double bind, judged as too soft if warm and too harsh if assertive. Rotating chairs among all members lets residents see many leadership styles.

Relationships and Health

Close relationships also affect health: people with supportive partners and friends tend to live longer and recover from illness faster, while chronic conflict is linked to stress-related problems.

Limits

Gottman and Levenson studied a small sample of couples, mostly married and in one region. Online dating has changed since Finkel and colleagues' review. Gender research increasingly recognizes nonbinary identities that older studies did not measure.

Conclusion

Hyde showed that women and men are more alike than different on most psychological measures, Gottman and Levenson showed that the balance of positive and negative interaction predicts whether marriages last and Finkel and colleagues showed that online dating expands access but cannot predict compatibility. As this course closes, the lesson is that the presence of others, partners, neighbors and strangers, shapes us powerfully, and that how we treat one another matters more than the categories we fall into.

References

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.221

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581

Reading the PSY 3790 Module 6 assignment instructions

TESU's public syllabus for PSY-3790 ends with Module 6, Gender and Relationships. Distinguish sex and gender, explain at least one theory of gender differences and evaluate evidence on how large psychological gender differences are. Examine research on what predicts relationship quality or stability and on a modern relationship topic, such as online dating. Apply the findings to a real relationship or setting with care and accuracy, and note limits, including the populations studied and changes in how gender is understood. Some sections ask for a focus on attraction or friendship instead. Ask whether personal reflection is welcome and how much detail is appropriate. Address leadership and gender if relevant to your setting.

Inside the PSY 3790 Module 6 example

Kayla Nguyen, the invented tenant organizer, recently engaged after meeting her partner online, asks what research says about gender and lasting love. Sex, gender and social role theory are explained, then Hyde's review of 46 meta-analyses, Gottman and Levenson's study of couples' interaction and Finkel and colleagues' review of online dating are linked to her relationship in a table. The paper then applies the findings to her relationship, to friendships and neighbors and to gender roles in the association, before limits and a closing conclusion for the course. Sections on attraction and on how love changes over time complete the discussion of relationships. Responsiveness is discussed as a key to lasting relationships. A section on gender and leadership connects the research to the association.

Reading the PSY 3790 Module 6 grading rubric

Gender and relationships papers earn credit when they distinguish sex and gender, report the size of gender differences accurately, including exceptions, and explain why overstating differences can cause harm. Readers look for a careful account of research predicting relationship outcomes, with the specific behaviors involved, and for a balanced evaluation of a modern topic such as online dating, including what algorithms cannot do. Applying findings to real relationships with accuracy and discretion, and noting the limits of older samples and binary measures, shows mature reasoning. Including research on attraction and on passionate and companionate love shows breadth. Including responsiveness shows command of current relationship research.

PSY 3790 Module 6 help from the desk

Gender and relationships papers often repeat popular claims about men and women. Report what meta-analyses show about the size of differences, including exceptions, and explain theories such as social roles. Describe research on what predicts relationship success and evaluate a modern topic such as online dating. Apply the findings to a real relationship or group with discretion. Note limits, including changing understandings of gender. Pass along the gender and relationships prompt to get a free first draft that answers it point by point. Cover attraction or how love changes over time if space allows. Mention responsiveness or other features of strong relationships.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More PSY 3790 and Bachelor of Arts in Psychology sample papers

PSY 3790 Module 6 questions, answered

Where can I find a free PSY 3790 Module 6 sample paper?

The gender and relationships paper, from gender similarities to online dating, is published here.

Are men and women psychologically very different?

Hyde found most gender differences small or near zero, with exceptions such as throwing distance and physical aggression.

What predicts whether a marriage lasts?

Gottman and Levenson found couples with more negative than positive interaction were more likely to separate.

Do dating app matching algorithms work?

Finkel and colleagues found no compelling evidence that matching algorithms predict long-term success.

What is social role theory?

The view that gender differences arise largely from the roles women and men have historically occupied.