| Course | PJM-5100 Project Management |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Written assignment 2: proposals and bidding; project overview |
| Length | About 845 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Master of Science in Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PJM 5100 Module 2
Not the Lowest Bid: Writing an RFP and Choosing a Builder for Branch Nine
Student Name
Master of Science in Management, Thomas Edison State University
PJM-5100: Project Management
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Not the Lowest Bid: Writing an RFP and Choosing a Builder for Branch Nine
Introduction
Gido et al. (2018) describe the stages through which most projects pass before work begins: identifying a need, preparing a request for proposal, developing proposals and selecting a contractor. For Prairie Hills Credit Union's ninth branch, introduced in the first assignment, the credit union is the customer and a general contractor will build the facility. This assignment prepares the request for proposal, chooses a contract type, evaluates three proposals and sets out the project overview.
Needs Identification
The need, confirmed in the initiating phase, is a full-service branch in the growing suburb, where the credit union has 3,400 members who now drive 15 to 20 minutes to the nearest branch and where two competing banks have opened. The board approved a budget of $2.85 million and an opening by September 30. Construction of the building, parking lot and drive-up lanes is the largest component and the one to be contracted.
The Request for Proposal
The textbook lists the elements a request for proposal should include so that contractors can prepare comparable responses. The credit union's version contains a statement of work describing a 4,200-square-foot single-story branch on the owned lot, built to the architect's completed drawings; requirements for materials, accessibility and the drive-up canopy; deliverables, including a certificate of occupancy and as-built drawings; customer-supplied items, such as vault, ATM and teller equipment installed by the credit union's vendors; approvals, with the credit union's facilities manager approving change orders; the contract type and payment terms, monthly progress payments with 5 percent retainage; the required schedule, substantial completion by August 15 to allow six weeks for equipment and training; the proposal format and due date; and the evaluation criteria and their weights.
Contract Type
The textbook contrasts fixed-price contracts, in which the contractor agrees to a set price and bears the risk of overruns, with cost-reimbursement contracts, in which the customer pays actual costs plus a fee and bears more of the risk. Bajari and Tadelis (2001) show that fixed-price contracts give contractors strong incentives to control costs but become expensive when designs are incomplete and many changes must be renegotiated, while cost-plus contracts suit complex projects whose designs are likely to change. Because the architect's drawings are complete and the building is a standard branch design, a fixed-price contract is appropriate. Bajari et al. (2009), studying private building construction, found that owners tended to use competitive bidding for simpler projects and negotiation for more complex ones, which also supports competitive bidding here.
Evaluating the Proposals
Three contractors submitted proposals. Each was scored from 1 to 10 on four weighted criteria stated in the request for proposal.
| Criterion (weight) | Cedar Ridge Builders | Hawkeye Construction | Prairie State Contracting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (40%) | 8 ($1.94 million) | 10 ($1.86 million) | 6 ($2.02 million) |
| Schedule and experience with financial branches (25%) | 9 | 6 | 8 |
| Technical approach and plan (20%) | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| References and past performance (15%) | 9 | 6 | 8 |
| Weighted score | 8.40 | 7.80 | 7.40 |
Hawkeye's bid is $80,000 lower, but it has built no financial branches, its schedule allows only one week of float before the August 15 completion date, and two references reported late finishes. Cedar Ridge, at $1.94 million, has built four branches for other credit unions and proposes a schedule with three weeks of float. The credit union should award the contract to Cedar Ridge. The higher price buys a lower risk of missing the September opening, which matters because the timing is tied to the fall lending season.
The Project Overview
With the contractor selected, the project overview summarizes the baseline: the objective from the first assignment; the scope, comprising construction by Cedar Ridge plus equipment, technology, staffing and marketing managed by the credit union; and the budget. Construction is $1.94 million, about $380,000 goes to technology and equipment, $120,000 to furniture and signs, and $150,000 to hiring, training and opening promotion, for a base of $2.59 million, plus a contingency of about $260,000, or 10 percent, bringing the total to $2.85 million. Major milestones are the construction start on March 15, substantial completion on August 15, staff training in September and opening on September 30.
Risks in the Procurement Plan
Three procurement risks remain after the award. Cedar Ridge's three weeks of float could be consumed by weather in March and April, so the contract should require a revised schedule within five days of any delay. The fixed price protects the budget only if the design stays stable, so the credit union should freeze the drawings and route every change through the approval process described in the request for proposal. And because vault, ATM and teller equipment come from separate vendors, their delivery dates must be coordinated with the contractor's completion date, which the next assignment's schedule will make explicit.
Conclusion
A complete request for proposal, a fixed-price contract suited to a finished design and a weighted evaluation that values schedule reliability over the lowest price give the branch a sound procurement baseline. The project overview carries that baseline into detailed planning.
References
Bajari, P., & Tadelis, S. (2001). Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(3), 387-407. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696361
Bajari, P., McMillan, R., & Tadelis, S. (2009). Auctions versus negotiations in procurement: An empirical analysis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 25(2), 372-399. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewn002
Gido, J., Clements, J. P., & Baker, R. (2018). Successful project management (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
What the PJM 5100 Module 2 instructions ask for
Module 2's written assignment in PJM-5100 covers proposals and bidding and the project overview. Expect to prepare or evaluate a request for proposal, choose a contract type, compare proposals and summarize the project baseline. Include the elements of a request for proposal described by Gido, Clements and Baker, explain the contract type with reference to risk and design completeness, and evaluate proposals with weighted criteria announced in advance. Show the scoring in a table and explain why the winner was chosen, especially if it is not the lowest bid. End with a project overview that states scope, budget and milestones. Make sure the budget figures in the overview add up exactly.
Inside the PJM 5100 Module 2 example
The paper follows the textbook's sequence from need to request for proposal, contract type, evaluation and overview. The request for proposal is described element by element, so a reader can see that nothing important is missing. The contract choice is justified with two studies on procurement, linking theory to the project's complete design. The evaluation table makes the weighted scores easy to check, and the paragraph after it explains the trade-off between price and schedule risk. The overview gives a budget that adds up, including a contingency carried forward from the first assignment, and the milestones that later assignments will schedule. Read it as the second chapter of the same project.
Reading the PJM 5100 Module 2 grading rubric
The rubric gives the second assignment its score. They look for a complete request for proposal, a contract type justified by the project's risk and design, and a transparent, weighted evaluation of proposals with criteria stated in advance. Choosing a higher bid should be explained with evidence. Research on procurement or contracting strengthens the analysis. The project overview should be consistent with earlier work and add up arithmetically. Readable tables, headings and correct references finish the paper. Papers that select the lowest bid without analysis, or that list request-for-proposal elements without applying them, score lower. A clearly reasoned choice of contract type earns notable credit from mentors. Clarity helps.
Common PJM 5100 Module 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Students often treat price as the only criterion, or set evaluation weights after seeing the bids, which undermines fairness. Another weakness is choosing a contract type without connecting it to how complete the design is. Our writers can prepare PJM 5100 proposal and bidding assignments for the project you are developing. Decide the evaluation criteria and weights before considering any bid, and include them in the request for proposal. Score each proposal on each criterion with brief reasons, multiply by the weights and compare totals. Then explain the choice in terms of risk to the project objective. Finally, keep a written record of how each score was reached. Then check the arithmetic.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More PJM 5100 and Master of Science in Management sample papers
- PJM 5100 Module 1: Defining a Branch Opening as a Project
- PJM 5100 Module 3: WBS, Responsibilities and the Branch Schedule
- PJM 5100 Module 4: Leveling, Budgets and a Status Report
- PJM 5100 Module 5: Leading the Branch Project Team
- PJM 5100 Module 6: Communication Plan and Matrix Structure
- IOP 5100 Module 7: Written Assignment: What the Engagement Survey Says About Turnover and Service
- ORG 5020 Module 5: Final Project: A Personal Leadership Plan
- HRM 5300 Module 6: Final Paper: Delta's People as Advantage
- MAN 6300 Module 3: Data Analysis Written Assignment
PJM 5100 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free PJM 5100 Module 2 sample paper?
The second Project Management written assignment is shown above, with a request for proposal, contract type choice, weighted bid evaluation and project overview for a composite credit union branch.
What should a request for proposal include?
A statement of work, requirements, deliverables, customer-supplied items, approvals, contract type, payment terms, schedule, proposal format and due date, and evaluation criteria.
When is a fixed-price contract appropriate?
When the design is complete and changes are unlikely, so the contractor can price the work and bear the risk of overruns.
Why might a customer choose a higher bid?
Because weighted criteria such as experience, schedule reliability and references can outweigh a modest price difference when risk to the objective matters.
What is a project overview?
A summary of the project baseline, including the objective, scope, budget and major milestones, after the contractor is selected.