| Course | NUR-7110 Nursing Informatics Consumer Informatics and Communications Technologies |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Consumer informatics paper: remote patient monitoring |
| Length | About 1,009 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | M.S. in Nursing, Nursing Informatics |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 7110 Module 4
A Scale, a Tablet and a Nurse Who Calls Back: Planning Heart Failure Telemonitoring in Vineland Without Overpromising
Student Name
M.S. in Nursing, Nursing Informatics, Thomas Edison State University
NUR-7110: Nursing Informatics: Consumer Informatics and Communications Technologies
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
A Scale, a Tablet and a Nurse Who Calls Back: Planning Heart Failure Telemonitoring in Vineland Without Overpromising
The Proposal
The health system and its figures are invented. A health system in Vineland admits about 900 patients a year for heart failure, and about one in five returns within 30 days. A vendor is selling a home kit: a wireless scale, a cuff for blood pressure and a tablet that quizzes patients about symptoms each morning and forwards everything to a nurse dashboard. The vendor's brochure promises a 50 percent reduction in readmissions. The chief nursing officer asked the informatics nurse whether the evidence supported the investment and, if so, how to design the program.
What the Reviews Show
Inglis et al. (2015) updated their Cochrane review comparing usual care with two remote approaches for heart failure: scheduled nurse phone calls and home telemonitoring. Pooled across randomized trials, telemonitored patients died less often and were readmitted for heart failure less often, and structured telephone support showed similar but smaller benefits. Both approaches improved some measures of quality of life and knowledge. The authors noted that the trials varied widely in the technology used, the patients enrolled and how clinicians responded to the data, and that the quality of evidence was moderate.
A Trial That Did Not Help
Chaudhry et al. (2010) randomized 1,653 patients, each recently discharged after a heart failure admission, to telephone monitoring or usual care. Monitored patients called a telephone system each day and answered questions about symptoms and weight, and clinicians reviewed variances. After 180 days, readmission or death from any cause was nearly the same in the two groups, and there were no significant differences in heart failure readmissions or deaths. Many patients assigned to monitoring never used the system, and by the trial's last weeks barely more than half still called in on three or more days a week. The trial suggested that monitoring helps only if patients keep using it and clinicians act on what it shows.
Reading the Evidence Together
The review and the trial are not contradictory. The review pooled many trials with different designs, some with close nurse follow-up and some with little, and found benefit on average. The Tele-HF trial tested a low-touch telephone system and found that patients drifted away and that average benefit disappeared. For Vineland, the lesson is that devices alone are not a program. Patient engagement over months and a reliable clinical response to the data decide whether monitoring works.
| Source | Finding | Design implication |
|---|---|---|
| Inglis et al. (2015) | Telemonitoring linked with lower mortality and fewer HF admissions on average | Program worth testing; expect varied results |
| Chaudhry et al. (2010) | No benefit; many patients stopped using the system | Build engagement and track use from day one |
| ANA (2015) | Nurses in consumer informatics promote engagement and user-centered tools | Design with patients; nurses own the response |
The Nurse's Role
The scope and standards for nursing informatics (American Nurses Association, 2015) describe the informatics nurse's work with consumers: promoting their engagement, advocating for tools designed around their needs, supporting their use of technology and protecting their information. In remote monitoring, that role reaches beyond selecting devices to designing the whole experience, from the first teaching at discharge to the nurse's call when a weight rises.
The Program Design
The informatics nurse proposed a design built around engagement and response. Patients are chosen by need, starting with those who have had two admissions in a year. A nurse sets up the equipment in the home within three days of discharge and teaches the patient and a family member to use it, rather than leaving a box at the bedside. Questions on the tablet are short, in English and Spanish, and change as the patient improves. Each day's data are reviewed by a dedicated heart failure nurse, who calls within two hours when weight rises by more than a set amount or symptoms worsen, with standing orders from the cardiology team for diuretic adjustments. If a patient misses two days of readings, a nurse calls to find out why. After 90 days, the patient and nurse decide together whether to continue.
Supporting Patients at Home
The home visit is where engagement begins. The nurse places the scale where the patient will see it each morning, practices a reading with the patient and a family member, and writes the patient's target weight range on a card taped near the scale. The tablet's first screen shows the patient's own trend in plain words. Patients learn what will happen when a reading is out of range, so a call from the nurse does not feel like an alarm. At two weeks, the nurse calls to hear how the routine is going, and the patient can change the time of the daily reminder. These steps respond directly to the drift in use that undermined the large telephone trial.
Testing Before Scaling
Instead of buying equipment for all patients, the system will run a one-year pilot with 150 patients, compared with similar patients who are not enrolled, and will track use and outcomes closely. The vendor's claim of a 50 percent reduction will not be used in planning.
Measures
The pilot will track daily reading rates, the share of patients still using the system at 30, 60 and 90 days, time from alert to nurse call, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, emergency visits, patient satisfaction and nurse time per patient.
Limits
The comparison group in a pilot will differ from enrolled patients in ways that are hard to measure. A dedicated nurse is expensive, and the pilot must show whether the cost is justified. Some patients lack reliable cellular service at home.
Conclusion
The vendor's promise was larger than the evidence. A Cochrane review found benefit on average, a large trial found none when patients stopped using a low-touch system and nursing standards placed engagement and response at the center. A program designed around home teaching, daily nurse review and attention to missed readings, tested in a pilot, gives Vineland the best chance of real benefit.
References
American Nurses Association. (2015). Nursing informatics: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). American Nurses Association.
Chaudhry, S. I., Mattera, J. A., Curtis, J. P., Spertus, J. A., Herrin, J., Lin, Z., Phillips, C. O., Hodshon, B. V., Cooper, L. S., & Krumholz, H. M. (2010). Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(24), 2301-2309. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1010029
Inglis, S. C., Clark, R. A., Dierckx, R., Prieto-Merino, D., & Cleland, J. G. F. (2015). Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (10), Article CD007228. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007228.pub3
What the NUR 7110 Module 4 instructions ask for
Current trends and emerging technologies in consumer informatics are part of TESU's catalog description of NUR-7110, and with no syllabus posted for the course, the fourth module is planned as a remote monitoring program paper. Your paper should describe the patient need and the proposed technology, reviews evidence including trials that did not show benefit, explains what made programs succeed or fail, defines the nurse's role using professional standards and designs a program with engagement, response and measures, ideally starting with a pilot. Some sections assign telehealth visits or wearable devices instead. Check whether the brief expects a cost analysis and whether vendor materials may be cited, and treat vendor claims as claims rather than evidence. Describe the patient's first days with the equipment, since that is where use is won or lost.
How the NUR 7110 Module 4 example is put together
An invented Vineland health system's heart failure readmissions and a vendor's promise of halving them open the paper. A Cochrane review shows benefit on average, and the Tele-HF trial shows none when patients stopped using a low-touch system. The two are read together, and a three-row table turns the evidence and the ANA standards into design choices. The program centers on home teaching, daily nurse review, calls for missed readings and a 90-day decision. A pilot replaces the vendor's promise, followed by measures and limits before the close. An annotation explains how the design answers the large trial's failure, and a section on the home visit shows how engagement starts on day one.
Where the marks sit in the NUR 7110 Module 4 rubric
Remote monitoring papers earn credit for a clear patient need, balanced use of favorable and unfavorable evidence, an explanation of why programs succeed or fail, a defined nursing role and a program designed around engagement and clinical response, with a pilot and measures. Mentors notice when a writer refuses to plan around vendor claims. Tracking whether patients keep using the devices shows understanding of the main failure point. Standing orders for nurses to act on data show practical design. Cochrane reviews and trials should be cited completely, with professional standards cited as books. Detail about the home visit shows that the writer understands how patients actually use equipment.
NUR 7110 Module 4 help: mistakes that cost marks
Monitoring papers often cite only trials that worked; include the ones that did not and explain the difference. Another common problem is focusing on devices instead of the people who respond to the data. Plan home teaching and calls when readings stop. Give nurses the authority to act. Start with a pilot and a comparison group. Do not repeat a vendor's numbers as evidence. Describe how patients learn the equipment at home. Send your monitoring proposal for a free first draft at the depth of the Vineland plan.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 7110 and M.S. in Nursing, Nursing Informatics sample papers
- NUR 7110 Module 1: Patient Portal Paper: Open Notes and an Enrollment Gap
- NUR 7110 Module 2: eHealth Literacy Paper: A Diabetes Portal for Patients With Limited Literacy
- NUR 7110 Module 3: User-Centered Design Paper: A Postpartum Blood Pressure App Built With Patients
- NUR 7110 Module 5: App Privacy Paper: Reviewing Mental Health Apps Before Recommending Them
- NUR 7110 Module 6: Online Community Paper: A Caregiver Forum, Peer Support and Misinformation
- NUR 7010 Module 6: Knowledge Management Paper: Capturing a Wound Expert's Tacit Knowledge and Protecting It
- NUR 6310 Module 2: Current-State Analysis Paper: Medication Reconciliation Workflow Through a Sociotechnical Lens
NUR 7110 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 7110 Module 4 sample paper?
The remote monitoring paper for an invented Vineland health system's heart failure program, from the evidence table to the pilot design, can be read on this page.
Does telemonitoring help patients with heart failure?
On average, yes: the Cochrane review linked it with fewer deaths and fewer heart failure admissions, though the evidence was only moderate in quality.
What did the Tele-HF trial find?
Telephone-based monitoring did not reduce readmission or death over 180 days, and many patients stopped using the system.
Why do some monitoring programs fail?
Patients stop using the devices and clinicians do not respond reliably to the data, so the technology alone does not change outcomes.
What is the nurse's role in remote monitoring?
To teach patients and families, review data daily, act on changes with standing orders and follow up when readings stop.