| Course | NUR-7069 Professional Identity Development for Nurse Practitioners |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Professional role paper: ethical dilemma analysis |
| Length | About 1,066 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | M.S. in Nursing, Family and Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 7069 Module 3
Please Don't Tell My Mom: Weighing Confidentiality, Safety and Family in an Adolescent Visit at a Plainfield Family Practice
Student Name
M.S. in Nursing, Family and Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, Thomas Edison State University
NUR-7069: Professional Identity Development for Nurse Practitioners
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Please Don't Tell My Mom: Weighing Confidentiality, Safety and Family in an Adolescent Visit at a Plainfield Family Practice
The Situation
The patient, the family and the practice in this paper are invented. Maya is 16 and has been a patient at a family practice in Plainfield since childhood. Her mother usually brings her, but today she came alone after school. She tells me, the family nurse practitioner, that she has had burning with urination and a new discharge for five days, that she has a boyfriend of 17 and that she is afraid her mother will be angry. She asks me to test and treat her without her mother knowing, and to make sure nothing shows up on the family's insurance statements. Her mother is listed as the contact on the account and sometimes calls to ask about Maya's visits.
Why This Is a Dilemma
Two duties pull in different directions. I owe Maya care for a likely infection and respect for her developing independence. I also respect her mother's role, the family's involvement in Maya's health and the practice's usual habit of sharing information with parents of minors. Each choice has a cost. If I insist on telling her mother, Maya may leave untreated and avoid care in the future. If I keep her confidence, her mother may later feel deceived, and I may miss a chance to bring a supportive adult into the picture.
The Principles
Beauchamp and Childress (2019) set out four principles for clinical ethics, usually named respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice. None automatically outranks the others, and they must be weighed in each case.
Respect for autonomy asks me to honor the choices of a person able to make them. Maya is a minor, but adolescents develop decision-making capacity gradually, and she understands her symptoms, the test and the treatment. Beneficence asks me to act for her good, which here means testing and treating promptly and preventing complications. Nonmaleficence asks me to avoid harm, including the harm of driving her away from care. Justice asks me to treat her as I would other adolescents in her situation, according to the practice's policy, not according to how well I know her family.
| Principle | What it asks here |
|---|---|
| Respect for autonomy | Honor a capable adolescent's request for privacy |
| Beneficence | Test and treat the likely infection today |
| Nonmaleficence | Avoid choices that drive her away from care |
| Justice | Apply the same policy to every adolescent |
The Code and the Law
According to the code of ethics from the American Nurses Association (2015), a nurse owes first loyalty to the patient and must protect the patient's right to privacy and confidentiality, sharing information only as needed for care or as the law requires. Its interpretive statements recognize that the rights of minors and the involvement of families have to be balanced with the patient's interests.
The law narrows the question. Under New Jersey law, as everywhere in the country, a minor can consent to STI testing and treatment without a parent signing anything. The law does not require that the parent be told, though it permits a clinician to share information in some circumstances. Insurance statements are a separate problem, because an explanation of benefits may be mailed to the policyholder. The practice's billing office can flag sensitive services and offer a sliding-fee or grant-funded option that keeps the visit off the family's statement.
Safety sets a limit. If Maya described sexual activity with an adult much older than her, abuse or coercion, my duty to report would override her request. Her boyfriend is 17, and she describes the relationship as her choice, so no report is required, but I would ask the screening questions carefully.
What the Evidence Says
Ford et al. (1997) randomly assigned high school students to listen to a recorded office visit in which the physician offered an unconditional assurance of confidentiality, a conditional assurance or no mention of it. Students who heard an assurance were more willing to disclose sensitive information, and those who heard an unconditional assurance were more willing to return for future visits. The study used a simulated visit, but it supports what clinicians see in practice: adolescents avoid care when they fear disclosure.
The Decision
I will test and treat Maya today, confidentially, and arrange for the visit to be billed in a way that does not appear on her mother's insurance statement. I will explain clearly what I can keep private and when I could not, such as if she were in danger. I will also ask whether there is a trusted adult she could talk to and offer to help her talk with her mother if she wants to, now or later.
The Conversation
I tell Maya that her visit is confidential, that the test results will come to her by phone and that I will not discuss them with her mother unless she asks me to or her safety is at risk. I give her treatment, explain how to avoid reinfection, recommend that her partner be treated and offer contraception and HPV vaccine counseling. Before she leaves, I ask what she thinks her mother would do if she knew. She says her mother would be upset but would help. I offer to sit with them both if she ever wants to tell her. She says she will think about it.
Documentation
I document the visit in a confidential section of the record that the patient portal does not display to her mother's proxy account, and I note the minor consent provision that applies, the safety screening I completed and the plan for results. The front desk is asked to update Maya's preferred phone number for confidential calls. These steps matter because confidentiality is often broken by systems, such as portal access or mailed statements, rather than by a clinician's choice.
Limits
Not every family is safe, and I cannot be sure how Maya's mother would respond. Billing workarounds depend on funding that may not last. Practice policy, state law and federal program rules change, and clinicians must check current rules rather than relying on any one paper.
Conclusion
The principles pointed in different directions, but the law, the nursing code and evidence on adolescent behavior together support confidential testing and treatment. The decision honors Maya's request, protects her health and leaves an opening for her family, while safety limits remain clear.
References
American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. American Nurses Association.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ford, C. A., Millstein, S. G., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., & Irwin, C. E., Jr. (1997). Influence of physician confidentiality assurances on adolescents' willingness to disclose information and seek future health care: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 278(12), 1029-1034. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550120089044
Reading the NUR 7069 Module 3 assignment instructions
Addressing ethical dilemmas is the first key topic in TESU's catalog description of NUR-7069, and with the syllabus held for registered students, module three becomes an ethical dilemma analysis from nurse practitioner practice. Plan a paper that describes the case factually, shows why two duties conflict, works a recognized ethical framework through the facts, consults the nursing code and the governing law, brings in evidence about likely consequences and defends a decision along with the steps to carry it out. Some sections assign end-of-life decisions, prescribing requests or conflicts of interest instead. Look at whether the brief names a decision-making model, such as a four-box method, and whether state law must be cited. Use a case from practice only with every identifying detail changed.
How this NUR 7069 Module 3 example is built
An invented 16-year-old's request for confidential testing at a Plainfield family practice opens the paper. The competing duties are named. Beauchamp and Childress's four principles are applied in a four-row table. The nursing code's privacy provisions and state law on minors' consent narrow the question, and a safety limit is stated. A randomized study of confidentiality assurances supplies evidence on consequences. The decision, the conversation with the patient, limits and a conclusion follow. Annotations point to principles applied rather than defined and to a decision that answers both duties. A section on documentation shows how portals and billing can break a promise of privacy.
NUR 7069 Module 3 rubric: what earns full marks
Ethical dilemma papers earn credit for a factual case description, a clear statement of the competing duties, accurate application of a named framework to the specific facts, attention to the professional code and the law, use of evidence about consequences and a defended decision with a plan for carrying it out. Mentors look for analysis rather than definitions. Stating the limits on confidentiality, such as reporting duties, shows judgment. Describing the actual conversation with the patient shows that the writer can act on the decision. Citing the code, the framework and any study accurately in APA style completes the paper. Attention to the practical systems that protect or expose privacy is a mark of experience.
Common NUR 7069 Module 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Ethical papers often define each principle without applying it; tie every principle to a fact in the case. Another frequent problem is ignoring the law, which may settle part of the question. State what would change your decision, such as a safety concern. Describe what you would say to the patient. Avoid presenting your decision as the only possible one. Check how your record and billing systems could reveal what you promised to keep private. The Plainfield analysis can be a model, and a first draft for your own case, built on your own case and brief, is free.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 7069 and M.S. in Nursing, Family and Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner sample papers
- NUR 7069 Module 1: Role Transition Paper: A New FNP's First Year and the Limbo-to-Legitimacy Model
- NUR 7069 Module 2: Civility Paper: Rudeness, Team Performance and a Clinic Code of Conduct
- NUR 7069 Module 4: Structural Competency Paper: Implicit Bias, Structural Racism and a Clinic No-Show Policy
- NUR 7069 Module 5: Interprofessional Practice Paper: The IPEC Competencies in a Diabetes Team
- NUR 7069 Module 6: Well-Being Paper: Burnout Evidence and a Plan That Is Not Only Self-Care
NUR 7069 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 7069 Module 3 sample paper?
The ethical dilemma paper about an invented 16-year-old at a Plainfield family practice, from her request to the defended decision, sits in full above.
What are the four principles of biomedical ethics?
Beauchamp and Childress list autonomy (respecting a capable person's choices), nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice.
Can minors consent to STI testing without a parent?
Yes. All fifty states let minors give their own consent for STI care, though the age limits and details differ.
Do confidentiality assurances change adolescent behavior?
Yes. In Ford's randomized study, teenagers who were promised privacy talked more openly and said they were likelier to come back.
When must a clinician break an adolescent's confidence?
When the law requires a report, such as suspected abuse, or when the patient is at serious risk of harm.