NUR 4450 Module 4 Communication Competency Evidence Example

Reviewed by Gwyneth Ollerton, MSN, RN Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

Three competencies, three documented calls: this NUR 4450 Module 4 sample evidences communication, teamwork and informatics from a telephone triage nurse's real-world record. Written for Validating Nursing Competence in the TESU BSN program, it presents a call where a professional interpreter replaced a teenage translator and changed the disposition, an SBAR page to an on-call physician rewritten after a poor first attempt, and a documentation gap in triage software traced and fixed with the informatics team. NUR-4450 is the code used in the TESU catalog. Each example names the standard it is measured against and what it does not prove, and three references support the paper.

CourseNUR-4450 Validating Nursing Competence
ModuleModule 4
Paper typeCompetency evidence paper
LengthAbout 1,043 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramBachelor of Science in Nursing
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 4450 Module 4

1

Three Calls, Three Competencies: Documented Evidence of Communication, Teamwork and Informatics on a Nurse Triage Line

Student Name

Bachelor of Science in Nursing, Thomas Edison State University

NUR-4450: Validating Nursing Competence

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe parallel structure of the title promises one example for each competency, which is what the module usually asks for. Mentors grading portfolio evidence appreciate a structure they can check at a glance.
2

Three Calls, Three Competencies: Documented Evidence of Communication, Teamwork and Informatics on a Nurse Triage Line

The fourth module of this course asks for evidence of competence in communication, teamwork and collaboration, and informatics, with a documented example for each. On a telephone triage line, these three competencies are not separate skills used at different times; they are the whole job. Every call is communication, every escalation is teamwork, and every disposition lives or dies in the record. This paper presents one documented example of each from the last six months, describes the standard each example is measured against, and states what the example proves and what it does not. Identifying details are removed, and the examples were chosen because each one includes something I did not do well the first time.

Communication: An Interpreter-Assisted Call

Our line serves a region where many families speak Spanish or Haitian Creole. Early in my time on the line I sometimes relied on a bilingual family member to translate when a caller's English was limited, because waiting for the interpreter service added two or three minutes to the call. Karliner et al. (2007) looked across studies that compared trained interpreters with whoever happened to be available, often relatives, and concluded that trained interpreters brought fewer mistranslations, better understanding and care nearly as good as English speakers received, an advantage the relatives did not reliably provide. The review changed my practice. I now connect the interpreter line on any call where the caller is not fully comfortable in English, even if a relative offers to help, and I note the interpreter's number in the record so a reviewer can check the call later. The extra two minutes are part of the call, not a delay to it.

The documented example is a call last spring from a Haitian Creole-speaking parent, translated at first by the toddler's teenage sibling, about vomiting. I connected the professional interpreter line within the first minute. Through the interpreter it became clear that the child had not urinated since the morning and was unusually sleepy, details the sibling had translated as the baby is tired. The disposition changed from home care to an emergency visit. My documentation records the interpreter's identification number, the time of connection, and the teach-back the parent gave through the interpreter. The example shows that I use professional interpretation even when a family member is available; what it does not show is whether I would have made the same choice on a night when the queue was long.

What this page is doingThe example is documented with specific record elements, interpreter number, time and teach-back, and the writer names the limit of the evidence. Admitting what one example cannot prove is characteristic of the strongest portfolio papers.
3

Teamwork and Collaboration: An SBAR Escalation

Teamwork on a triage line means knowing when a call needs a physician and handing it off so the physician can act quickly. Haig et al. (2006) described the Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation format as a shared mental model that lets clinicians with different training communicate concisely and expect the same structure from each other. Our service adopted it for every page to the on-call physician.

The example is a call about an adult with type 1 diabetes whose insulin pump had failed during the night, with a glucose of 340 milligrams per deciliter and no ketone strips at home. The protocol directed a physician consult. My first page, reviewed later, was a narrative that buried the key facts. My second attempt, after the physician called back asking for the glucose and the time of the last insulin, followed the format: situation, pump failure with rising glucose; background, type 1 diabetes, last bolus at 2100, no ketone testing available; assessment, alert, drinking fluids, no vomiting, at risk for ketoacidosis without insulin; recommendation, guidance on backup injections and the threshold for emergency care. The physician gave orders in under a minute. The difference between the two pages was not clinical knowledge, which I had both times, but the order in which I offered it, and the structure made sure the facts the physician needed came first. I keep both versions of the page, with identifiers removed, as evidence of the change in how I collaborate.

Informatics: Fixing a Disposition That Did Not Arrive

The informatics competency, as Cronenwett et al. (2007) framed it, expects nurses to put information systems to work for communication, for knowledge, for catching errors and for better decisions. On our line, the most important informatics task is making sure the disposition reaches the patient's primary care office by morning. Last summer, a family told their pediatrician's office that the triage nurse had advised a morning appointment for a child's ear pain, but the office had no record of the call. With the office's permission I compared their intake log with our transmission log and traced the problem to the triage software, which sent the note only if the primary care practice was selected from a list; when a caller named a practice that had recently changed its name, nurses were typing it into a free-text field, and those notes went nowhere.

I reported the gap to our informatics nurse and documented ten examples from my own calls with identifiers removed. The fix was a search function that matched old and new practice names and a hard stop that would not let a call close with a free-text practice. In the three months after the change, the service's report of undelivered dispositions fell to zero. The example shows that I use the record as a safety tool and participate in improving it, which are the informatics skills the competency names.

What this page is doingThis example moves from a single missed message to a system cause and a measured fix, which demonstrates informatics competence at the level of system improvement. Mentors usually rate such examples higher than examples of competent personal documentation.
4

What the Three Examples Show Together

Each example began with something I did imperfectly: relying on family interpreters, writing a disorganized page, and, in the third case, not noticing a pattern until a family pointed it out. Each ended with a change in practice or in the system. Together they show competence that improved through feedback and evidence rather than competence that was simply present. They also show how dependent the three competencies are on each other: the interpreter call depended on documentation of the interpreter, the escalation depended on structured communication, and the documentation fix depended on teamwork with informatics staff. The remaining gap is breadth. Three examples cannot show consistency, and my final portfolio will need audit data on communication items to support the claim that these behaviors are routine.

References

Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P., Sullivan, D. T., & Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education for nurses. Nursing Outlook, 55(3), 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006

Haig, K. M., Sutton, S., & Whittington, J. (2006). SBAR: A shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 32(3), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(06)32022-3

Karliner, L. S., Jacobs, E. A., Chen, A. H., & Mutha, S. (2007). Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(2), 727-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00629.x

NUR 4450 Module 4 instructions, in plain terms

The fourth module of NUR-4450 often asks for evidence of competence in communication, teamwork and collaboration, and informatics, frequently with one documented example per competency. You will typically name each competency, describe one supporting example with its documents, tie it to a standard or study, and reflect on what it does and does not prove. Some sections accept evidence such as emails, de-identified notes, evaluations or project documents, and others want narrative only. Check the TESU course site for the evidence format, whether attachments are allowed, and how to protect patient and employer information. Choose examples that show a change or improvement, not only routine competence.

How the NUR 4450 Module 4 example is put together

The paper opens by explaining why these three competencies are the whole job on a triage line and says each example includes an initial weakness. The communication section uses a review of interpreter studies to explain a practice change, then documents a call where the professional interpreter revealed missing urine output and drowsiness. The teamwork section introduces SBAR and contrasts a disorganized page with a structured one in a diabetes pump failure. The informatics section traces an undelivered disposition to a free-text field and describes the fix and its result. The closing section shows how the three competencies depend on each other and names breadth as the remaining gap.

NUR 4450 Module 4 rubric: what earns full marks

Papers presenting competency evidence are usually assessed on the relevance of each example to its competency, the quality of documentation, the link to a standard or evidence, reflection on what the example shows, and writing. Mentors give strong weight to documentation, so examples supported by records, de-identified documents or measured results score higher than stories alone. The link to evidence is strongest when a study or framework explains why the behavior matters, as interpreter research and SBAR do here. Reflection earns full credit when it states both what an example proves and what it cannot. Examples that show improvement over time often score better than examples of steady, unremarkable competence.

NUR 4450 Module 4 help from the desk

Students often choose three examples that show the same skill, such as three good conversations, and label them as different competencies. Make sure each example clearly matches its competency. Another common problem is an example with no documentation, which a mentor cannot verify. Name the record, report or result behind each claim. Students also skip the limits of their evidence; one example rarely proves a routine behavior, so say so and explain how you would show consistency. Protect privacy by removing identifiers and getting permission for any workplace documents. If you need these three competency examples written up from your own work history, the desk can draft them from your notes. A strong example also names what you did next time, because a single success may be luck while a changed habit is evidence.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More NUR 4450 and Bachelor of Science in Nursing sample papers

NUR 4450 Module 4 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 4450 Module 4 sample paper?

Read it above: three documented examples, one per competency, each with its own margin note. The calls come from phone triage; your version should rest on records from your own shifts.

What documentation can I use as competency evidence?

De-identified notes, emails, audit results, project documents, evaluations and records of a change you helped make. Describe what the document shows and remove any patient or colleague identifiers. Check your employer's policy before using internal material.

Do I need a separate example for each competency?

Most directions ask for one example per competency so that each can be judged on its own. A single event can touch several competencies, but present it under the one it shows best and choose different events for the others.

Why use SBAR as evidence of teamwork?

SBAR is a widely adopted structure for handoffs and escalations, so showing that you use it, ideally with a before and after example, demonstrates the skill of communicating within a team. It also connects your example to published evidence on communication and safety.

How do I show informatics competence if I am not an informatics nurse?

Show how you use the record and technology to keep patients safe: catching a documentation problem, reporting a system gap, suggesting a fix, or using decision support appropriately. Measured results after a change make the example stronger.