| Course | NUR-4320 Nursing Care of Clients with Complex Health Conditions |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Critical care paper: end of life and organ donation |
| Length | About 1,065 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | B.S.N., Accelerated Second Degree |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 4320 Module 6
A Good Death in a Busy Unit: Family Conference, Comfort and Donation for a Patient in Livingston
Student Name
B.S.N., Accelerated Second Degree, Thomas Edison State University
NUR-4320: Nursing Care of Clients with Complex Health Conditions
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
A Good Death in a Busy Unit: Family Conference, Comfort and Donation for a Patient in Livingston
The Patient
Mrs. Bernstein and the ICU are invented. Mrs. Bernstein, 66, a retired public librarian, collapsed at home while gardening. Her husband found her unresponsive. A CT scan showed a large bleed deep in the brain extending into the ventricles. She was intubated by the emergency team and moved to the ICU with no response to pain and absent reflexes on one side. The neurosurgeon judged that surgery would not help. Her husband, two adult sons and a daughter gathered at the bedside. Her driver's license showed that she had registered as an organ donor.
The Family Conference
Lautrette et al. (2007) randomized the relatives of 126 patients who were dying in 22 intensive care units in France either to a proactive conference about the end of life plus a bereavement brochure or to the conference the unit usually held. Clinicians in that arm used the VALUE mnemonic, which asks them to value the family's words, acknowledge feelings, listen, come to understand the patient as a person and draw out questions. At 90 days, relatives in the intervention group reported less post-traumatic stress, and their anxiety and depression scores were lower too. Conferences were longer, and families spoke for a larger share of the time.
For the Bernstein family, the attending physician held a conference on the second day with the nurse, the social worker and the student present. The physician explained the bleed and its prognosis in plain words and then asked the family to describe Mrs. Bernstein. Her daughter said her mother had cared for her own father through a long illness and had said she did not want machines to keep her alive if there was no hope of recovery.
Why Discussion Matters
Wright et al. (2008) studied patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Patients who said they had talked with their physicians about the end of life were less likely to be ventilated, resuscitated or admitted to an ICU near death, and they entered hospice earlier. The discussions were not associated with more depression or worry. More aggressive care was associated with worse quality of life for patients near death and with poorer bereavement adjustment for caregivers. Although Mrs. Bernstein could no longer speak for herself, the study supports the value of hearing her wishes through her family.
Donation
Siminoff et al. (2001) interviewed families of eligible potential donors in hospitals in two U.S. regions. Families were more likely to consent when they knew the patient's wishes, when they talked with a coordinator from the organ procurement organization and when more topics about donation were discussed with them. The approach and the conversation mattered, not only the family's prior attitudes.
Hospital policy required the unit to call the organ procurement organization when death was expected. The coordinator met the family after the decision to withdraw life support, separately from the conversation about prognosis. Knowing that she had registered, the family agreed to donation after circulatory death.
| Source | Finding | Nursing role |
|---|---|---|
| Lautrette et al. (2007) | Proactive conference and brochure reduced relatives' stress symptoms | Attend, prepare the family and listen |
| Wright et al. (2008) | Discussions led to less aggressive care without added distress | Help the family share the patient's wishes |
| Siminoff et al. (2001) | Known wishes and coordinator involvement raised consent | Notify the procurement organization early |
Nursing Diagnoses
The student identified risk for complicated grieving in the family, risk for discomfort in the patient during withdrawal and family need for information and support.
Comfort Care
Before withdrawal, the nurse removed monitors that were no longer needed, silenced alarms in the room, set out chairs and invited the family to bring music. Mrs. Bernstein's sons played recordings of the choir she had sung in. Medicines for comfort were given as ordered to prevent signs of breathlessness or distress. The student helped wash her face and brush her hair and gave the family time alone.
The Donation Process
Because she was to donate after circulatory death, withdrawal took place in a room near the operating suite, and the family said goodbye there. The donation team was not present during withdrawal, and the physician who declared death had no role in the transplant. The student stayed with her husband in the family room after she was taken to surgery.
Evaluation
The family said they felt their mother's wishes had been honored. Her kidneys and liver were transplanted. The unit's social worker gave the family a bereavement brochure and called them two weeks later.
Caring for the Caregivers
The student had not been present for a death before. After Mrs. Bernstein was taken to surgery, the nurse suggested they sit for a few minutes in the staff room and talk about what had happened. The unit held a brief pause the following week in which staff remembered the patients who had died. The student learned that nurses who care for dying patients need to name their own grief in order to keep offering care to the next family.
Symptoms at the End
The comfort plan addressed breathlessness, secretions and restlessness. The nurse gave opioid and sedative doses in small steps based on signs of distress, such as a fast breathing rate or grimacing, rather than on a schedule, and documented the reason for each dose. Noisy breathing from secretions was treated by repositioning and medicine, and the student explained to the family that the sound did not mean she was suffering.
The Husband
Mr. Bernstein, married to her for forty-one years, said little during the conference. Afterward the student noticed him standing alone in the hallway and asked whether he wanted to sit with his wife. He did, and he talked about the libraries she had run. The student learned that the quietest family member may need the most attention.
Limits
Lautrette's trial took place in France, Wright's study involved cancer patients, not ICU patients, and Siminoff's study was observational. Practices around donation vary by state and hospital. A student supports the family but does not discuss donation with them.
Conclusion
Mrs. Bernstein's death in a busy ICU was calm and consistent with her wishes. A proactive family conference, honest discussion of her values and a donation conversation held by the right person at the right time made this possible, and the nursing role ran through each step.
References
Lautrette, A., Darmon, M., Megarbane, B., Joly, L. M., Chevret, S., Adrie, C., Barnoud, D., Bleichner, G., Bruel, C., Choukroun, G., Curtis, J. R., Fieux, F., Galliot, R., Garrouste-Orgeas, M., Georges, H., Goldgran-Toledano, D., Jourdain, M., Loubert, G., Reignier, J., . . . Azoulay, E. (2007). A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(5), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa063446
Siminoff, L. A., Gordon, N., Hewlett, J., & Arnold, R. M. (2001). Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA, 286(1), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.1.71
Wright, A. A., Zhang, B., Ray, A., Mack, J. W., Trice, E., Balboni, T., Mitchell, S. L., Jackson, V. A., Block, S. D., Maciejewski, P. K., & Prigerson, H. G. (2008). Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA, 300(14), 1665-1673. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.14.1665
What the NUR 4320 Module 6 instructions ask for
End-of-life care rounds out the complex conditions in TESU's description of NUR-4320, and without a published syllabus, module six is planned as an ICU end-of-life and donation paper. A good paper describes the patient and family, applies evidence on family conferences and end-of-life discussions, explains how families decide about donation, writes nursing diagnoses, describes comfort care and the safeguards around donation and evaluates the family's experience, with clear limits on the student's role. Some sections assign palliative care on a medical ward instead. Ask your mentor whether personal feelings belong in the paper and whether brain death criteria should be explained. Many mentors also ask how symptoms such as breathlessness and secretions were managed and how staff cared for themselves afterward.
Inside the NUR 4320 Module 6 example
An invented 66-year-old retired librarian with a massive brain hemorrhage, registered as a donor, opens the paper in a Livingston ICU. The Lautrette trial and VALUE approach, Wright and colleagues' study of end-of-life discussions and Siminoff and colleagues' study of donation consent are explained, with a table of nursing roles. A family conference that hears her wishes, comfort care with music and alarms silenced, donation after circulatory death with separate teams and bereavement follow-up follow. Comfort dosing for breathlessness and secretions and a moment of staff reflection after the death lead into the limits and the closing paragraph. Notes in the margin flag the safeguards and the family focus.
Reading the NUR 4320 Module 6 grading rubric
End-of-life papers earn credit for describing the patient as a person, accurate reporting of the conference trial and discussion research, a clear account of how donation conversations work, comfort care that addresses the room as well as symptoms, the safeguards that separate donation from the decision to withdraw and evaluation through the family's experience. Mentors notice when a student explains why the donation team stays apart. Acknowledging that one study involved cancer patients shows careful reading. Keeping donation discussion with the coordinator shows knowledge of scope. Dosing comfort medicines to signs of distress and documenting the reason shows sound practice. Explaining noisy breathing to the family shows sensitive teaching. Reflection on staff grief shows maturity.
Common NUR 4320 Module 6 mistakes, and how to avoid them
End-of-life papers often focus on medicines and miss the family; plan for both. Another common gap is blurring the decision to withdraw with the donation request. Learn the VALUE approach. Ask the family who the patient was. Silence alarms and make room for the family. Notify the procurement organization as policy requires. Leave the donation conversation to the coordinator. Send your own ICU case and we will turn it into a free first draft that follows your brief, including any reflection your mentor requires. Describe how comfort medicines were given and why. Explain noisy breathing to the family. Note how you cared for yourself after the death.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 4320 and B.S.N., Accelerated Second Degree sample papers
- NUR 4320 Module 1: ARDS Paper: Low Tidal Volumes and Prone Positioning in Severe Respiratory Failure
- NUR 4320 Module 2: Septic Shock Paper: Early Antibiotics, Fluids and Vasopressors After the Protocol Trials
- NUR 4320 Module 3: Trauma Hemorrhage Paper: Tranexamic Acid, Balanced Transfusion and the Trauma Bay
- NUR 4320 Module 4: STEMI Paper: Door-to-Balloon Time and the Nurse's Part in Reperfusion
- NUR 4320 Module 5: Brain Injury Paper: Preventing Secondary Injury After Severe TBI
- NUR 4210 Module 3: Gestational Diabetes Paper: Screening, Treatment and Follow-Up After Birth
- NUR 3480 Module 6: Sickle Cell Pain Paper: Timely Analgesia, Bias and an Individualized Plan
- NUR 3380 Module 5: Restoration Paper: Early Mobility After Colectomy and Enhanced Recovery
- NUR 4220 Module 4: Pediatric Medication Safety Paper: Weight-Based Dosing and Preventing Errors
NUR 4320 Module 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 4320 Module 6 sample paper?
The ICU end-of-life paper about an invented patient in Livingston, from the family conference to donation, appears on this page.
What is the VALUE approach to family conferences?
Five steps for clinicians: honor what relatives say, name their emotions, listen closely, get to know the patient as a person and ask for their questions.
Do end-of-life discussions harm patients?
Wright and colleagues found they led to less aggressive care and were not associated with more depression or worry.
What makes families more likely to consent to donation?
Knowing the patient's wishes, talking with a procurement coordinator and discussing more topics about donation.
Why is the donation team kept separate from end-of-life decisions?
To protect trust, so that the decision to withdraw is made for the patient's sake alone.