Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. MAN-4350 is TESU’s Project Management course. It centers on delivering defined work inside scope, schedule and budget, using the planning documents that make progress visible before a deadline proves it. Searches like "man 4350 module 4 assignment example", "MAN4350 sample paper", and "MAN-4350 module samples" land on this page.
What MAN-4350 is really about
MAN-4350 follows the process groups most sections still teach in order: initiating, planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and closing. Along the way you meet the knowledge areas, with scope, schedule and cost carrying the most assignment weight and quality, resources, communications, risk, procurement and stakeholders filling out the rest. Expect real technique rather than description: decomposing a scope statement into a work breakdown structure, sequencing activities and finding the critical path, estimating durations and costs, and reading earned value figures to say whether a project is behind or merely spending slowly. Many sections use terminology aligned to the PMBOK Guide, which is useful if you are eyeing a certification later.
For working adults this is often the most immediately usable course in the business core, and also the one where habits from work cause the most friction. Plenty of people run projects competently without ever producing a formal charter, and the course will not accept that. Documents have required elements, and a missing one is a missing rubric row regardless of how well the project would have gone. Because a term runs six modules, most sections carry one project from module to module, so an early scope statement becomes the source of a later schedule and budget. A vague scope written quickly in the opening stretch tends to cause trouble twice more before the term ends.
What MAN-4350’s assessments ask for
The written assignments are mostly artifacts with a short narrative wrapped around them. Expect a project charter with objectives, deliverables, assumptions and constraints; a scope statement and a work breakdown structure decomposed to a level someone could actually assign; an activity list with dependencies, a network diagram and a critical path identified; a cost estimate rolled up from the same structure; a risk register with probability, impact, response and an owner for each entry. Later modules often add earned value calculations and a status report interpreting them. Rubrics score completeness of required elements, internal consistency between documents, correct technique, and the clarity of the narrative that explains what the artifact shows. Discussions frequently ask what went wrong on a real project and which planning document would have caught it.
Where students lose points in MAN-4350
The submission that reads well and grades badly is the confident plan with nothing that could go wrong in it. Scope is clear, the schedule is tidy, the budget adds up, and risk appears once as a sentence promising that risks will be monitored throughout. That sentence is where the row dies. A risk register is a specific deliverable: identified events, each with a likelihood, an impact, a planned response and a person accountable for watching it. The same gap shows up as an unnamed stakeholder list, where the plan says communication will occur regularly without saying to whom or about what. Graders read both omissions the same way, as a plan built for a project where nobody has competing interests.
The MAN-4350 drawers
MAN-4350 Module 1 assignment example
Written assignment 1: a composite Hammonton blueberry cooperative's optical sorting and packing line, why it is a project and not a process, how a seasonal, functional cooperative shapes the work, and what the operations coordinator must do as its part-time project manager. Full sample paper, read it free.
MAN-4350 Module 2 assignment example
Written assignment 2: four capital proposals at a composite Hammonton blueberry cooperative (optical sorting line, rooftop solar, a freezing tunnel, a direct-to-consumer program) scored on five weighted criteria, tested with NPV, IRR and payback, and weighed as a portfolio under one year's capital limit. Full sample paper, read it free.
MAN-4350 Module 3 assignment example
Written assignment 3: leading a part-time team of six and an outside installation crew on a composite blueberry cooperative's sorting line, appraising the leader's own attributes, building the team stage by stage, settling a conflict over the maintenance shop's winter and negotiating the equipment delivery date. Full sample paper, read it free.
MAN-4350 Module 4 assignment example
Written assignment 4: the scope statement, six-part work breakdown structure, probability-impact risk register, issue log and change control rule for a composite Hammonton blueberry cooperative's optical sorting line, including a buried drain line and a request to add lot-tracking printers. Full sample paper, read it free.
MAN-4350 Module 5 assignment example
Written assignment 5: a ten-activity network for a composite Hammonton blueberry cooperative's sorting line, forward and backward passes to an 18-week critical path through equipment manufacture, float on the electrical and cooling-room paths, a $24,000 crash of the vendor slot and a $2.38 million bottom-up estimate with 8 percent contingency. Full sample paper, read it free.
MAN-4350 Module 6 assignment example
Written assignment 6: an earned value status report at week 10 for a composite Hammonton blueberry cooperative's sorting line (SPI 0.94, CPI 0.94), the corrective action on a late cooling room, and the closeout after a May 15 acceptance, ending by integration with three lessons recorded. Full sample paper, read it free.
Your classroom shows something else?
Thomas Edison State University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a MAN-4350 sample the right way
Send the assignment sheet and rubric with any template your mentor provided, and the first custom sample arrives free inside 24-48h in that format. Project artifacts reward imitation more than most writing does, because the value sits in structure: how a work breakdown structure numbers its levels, how a register lays out its columns, how a status narrative reports variance without editorializing. Read the sample for those conventions and for the level of granularity, which is the hardest thing to judge from instructions alone. Then build your own project inside that shape, with your own scope, estimates and risks.
How these samples are written
Method, in one line: prompt first, structure from the prompt, sources from the module, format exact. Module counts vary between runs and mentors; the catch-all row absorbs the difference. Your free request matches what your classroom actually shows.
MAN-4350 questions, answered
How many risks belong in a register for a course project?
Enough to cover the categories that could actually derail your project, usually across technical, resource, schedule, external and organizational sources. What matters is not the count but the specificity: a named event, a realistic likelihood and impact, a response that matches the severity, and an owner. Ten precise entries outscore thirty generic ones.
Can I use a project from work as my course project?
Usually the best option, and mentors tend to encourage it. Choose one small enough to decompose properly and finished enough that you know how it turned out. Then discipline yourself to produce the documents the module requires rather than describing what the team did informally, because the artifacts are what the rubric reads.
Do I need software to produce a schedule?
Rarely required. Most instruction sheets accept a table and a hand drawn network diagram as long as dependencies, durations and the critical path are clear and consistent with your work breakdown structure. If your mentor names a tool, follow that. Otherwise pick whatever lets you show the logic, since the reasoning is graded, not the rendering.