| Course | INV-7110 Investments |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 |
| Paper type | Module 1 written assignment: the investment environment and securities markets |
| Length | About 634 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Master of Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for INV 7110 Module 1
Before Picking a Stock: A Policy Statement, an Allocation and the Mechanics of the Market
Student Name
Master of Business Administration, Thomas Edison State University
INV-7110: Investments
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Before Picking a Stock: A Policy Statement, an Allocation and the Mechanics of the Market
Introduction
Dana and Paul Mercer, a composite couple aged 58 and 60 living in Princeton, have $1.6 million in retirement and taxable accounts and plan to retire in seven years. They want their savings to support about $70,000 a year of spending in retirement, on top of Social Security. Reilly et al. (2019) present the investment policy statement as the first step in the investment process, because it sets the objectives and constraints that every later decision must respect.
The Investment Policy Statement
| Element | The Mercers |
|---|---|
| Return objective | About 5.5% a year nominal, enough to grow the portfolio before retirement and support withdrawals of about 4% after |
| Risk tolerance | Average: able to bear losses, with stable jobs and a pension for Paul, but unwilling to see more than a 20% decline in a bad year |
| Time horizon | Two stages: 7 years to retirement, then about 30 years of withdrawals |
| Liquidity | An emergency fund of $40,000 held outside the portfolio; no large spending planned |
| Taxes | About 60% in tax-deferred accounts; place bonds there and broad equity funds in taxable accounts |
| Legal and unique | Paul's employer stock is 8% of assets and should be reduced over two years |
Asset Allocation
The policy points to a balanced allocation: 40 percent U.S. stocks, 15 percent international stocks, 35 percent investment-grade bonds and 10 percent Treasury inflation-protected securities and cash. The 55 percent equity share gives a reasonable chance of the 5.5 percent return while limiting losses in a severe year to roughly the 20 percent the couple can accept. Brinson et al. (1986) found that policy allocation explained most of the variation in quarterly returns over time for the pension funds they studied. Ibbotson and Kaplan (2000) clarified that allocation explains about 90 percent of a fund's variation over time but much less of the differences between funds, and that, on average, the return a fund earns is close to what its policy allocation would earn. For the Mercers, the allocation decision is therefore far more important than any single security choice.
A Margin Purchase
Suppose Paul, against advice, buys 500 shares of a $60 stock on margin with 50 percent initial margin and a 30 percent maintenance margin. He puts up $15,000 and borrows $15,000. Paul's equity hits the 30 percent floor when (500P minus $15,000) over 500P equals 0.30, which puts the call price at $15,000 over 350, or $42.86. If the price instead rises 20 percent to $72, his equity rises from $15,000 to $21,000, a 40 percent gain before interest. Borrowing half the cost doubles both gains and losses, and a fall of under 29 percent forces him to add cash or sell, which is why margin is unsuited to a policy with average risk tolerance.
Index Construction
A price-weighted index, like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, sums prices, so it moves from $175 to $182.50, a 4.3 percent rise, driven by the highest-priced stock. A value-weighted index, like the S&P 500, weights by market value: total value falls from $16 billion to $15.1 billion, a 5.6 percent decline, driven by the largest company. The same day looks like a gain in one index and a loss in the other, so the Mercers' adviser should benchmark them against value-weighted indexes that match their allocation.
| Stock | Price | Shares, millions | Price change |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | $100 | 10 | +10% |
| B | $50 | 100 | 0% |
| C | $25 | 400 | minus 10% |
Conclusion
The Mercers' portfolio starts with a policy statement that sets a 5.5 percent return objective and average risk tolerance, and an allocation of 55 percent equities that the research suggests will drive most of their results. Margin borrowing does not fit that policy, and their benchmarks should be value-weighted indexes matched to each asset class.
References
Brinson, G. P., Hood, L. R., & Beebower, G. L. (1986). Determinants of portfolio performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 42(4), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v42.n4.39
Ibbotson, R. G., & Kaplan, P. D. (2000). Does asset allocation policy explain 40, 90, or 100 percent of performance? Financial Analysts Journal, 56(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v56.n1.2327
Reilly, F. K., Brown, K. C., & Leeds, S. J. (2019). Investment analysis and portfolio management (11th ed.). Cengage.
INV 7110 Module 1 instructions, in plain terms
INV-7110 has four written assignments, together worth 24 percent of the grade, each built from end-of-chapter questions and problems in Reilly, Brown and Leeds. The first covers the investment setting, asset allocation, global investing, market organization and indexes. Expect to write or evaluate an investment policy statement, recommend an allocation, compute returns and margin calls, and compare index weighting methods. Show every calculation with its formula and explain what the answer means for an investor. Where questions ask for judgment, tie the answer to the client's objectives and constraints rather than to general rules of thumb. Many students build a composite client for the policy statement, which is acceptable if the client's details are specific enough to drive the allocation.
How the INV 7110 Module 1 example is put together
The paper introduces a composite client couple and their goal. A table sets out their policy statement element by element, from return objective to unique circumstances. An allocation section recommends percentages and uses research on allocation and performance, distinguishing what that research does and does not show. A margin section solves for the margin call price and the return on the borrowed position. An index section uses a three-stock example to show why price-weighted and value-weighted indexes can move in opposite directions. The conclusion ties each result back to the clients' policy. Each calculation is shown in the text with its inputs, so the reader can repeat it. The client stays at the center of the paper, so the margin and index problems become lessons about what suits this couple rather than isolated exercises.
Reading the INV 7110 Module 1 grading rubric
Mentors grade written assignments on correct calculations, accurate use of concepts and clear application to investment decisions. In this first assignment, policy statements that state measurable objectives and specific constraints show understanding beyond definitions. Allocation recommendations tied to the client's risk tolerance, and supported by research, demonstrate judgment. Margin and index problems with formulas and interpreted results earn full credit. Citations to the textbook and to journal research, in APA style, support the analysis and show the student has read beyond the chapter. Mentors also value papers that test a recommendation against the client's stated limits, such as checking that the allocation's likely loss in a bad year stays within what the clients said they could bear.
Common INV 7110 Module 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Students lose points by writing policy statements with vague objectives, by recommending allocations that do not follow from the client's constraints or by solving margin problems without explaining the result. Others cite allocation research as proof that security selection never matters. State the return objective as a number and risk tolerance in terms of losses the client can bear. Show each step of the margin calculation. Explain why index methods differ, not just that they do. Check each numerical answer against intuition, for example that a margin call price must be below the purchase price. A free first sample on your own INV-7110 Module 1 problems is available on request.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More INV 7110 and Master of Business Administration sample papers
- INV 7110 Module 2: Written Assignment: Portfolio Theory, the CAPM and a Three-Factor Model
- INV 7110 Module 3: Written Assignment: Top-Down Valuation of a Specialty Chemicals Stock
- INV 7110 Module 4: Final Project: Investing Client Funds in Two Hard Currencies
- FIN 7100 Module 5: Final Investment Recommendation Paper
- FSA 7120 Module 4: Written Assignment: A Credit Analysis of a Mid-Sized Manufacturer
- SUS 7000 Module 3: Written Assignment: Engaging Clients, Workers and Neighbors in the Printer's Program
- ETM 7500 Module 1: Written Assignment: A Controller, a Covenant and a Warranty Reserve
INV 7110 Module 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free INV 7110 Module 1 sample paper?
Mercer household policy statement, allocation, margin call and index example: all worked above.
What goes into an investment policy statement?
Return objective, risk tolerance and constraints: time horizon, liquidity, taxes, legal requirements and unique circumstances.
How is a margin call price calculated?
Solve for the price at which equity, the position's value less the loan, equals the maintenance margin share of the position's value.
Why do price-weighted and value-weighted indexes differ?
Price-weighted indexes are driven by high-priced stocks; value-weighted indexes by the largest companies.
How much of performance does asset allocation explain?
Research finds it explains most variation in a fund's returns over time, but less of the differences between funds.