HRM 8010 Module 3 Written Assignment: Training and Development Across Sites Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This HRM 8010 Module 3 example answers the written assignment on training and development in Seminar in Global Human Resource Management, a course in TESU's Doctor of Business Administration (DBA). Here the question is how to grow people who can carry out the strategy, and how to design, run and judge training in several countries. It designs the technician academy Kestrel proposed in Module 1. It applies research on training design and transfer, adapts delivery to local language and certification, adds a leadership development program and sets out how results will be measured. HRM-8010 asks how such a program would be judged, not only how it would run.

CourseHRM-8010 Seminar in Global Human Resource Management
ModuleModule 3
Paper typeModule 3 written assignment: training and development
LengthAbout 578 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramDoctor of Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HRM 8010 Module 3

1

A Technician Academy for Three Countries: Training and Development at Kestrel Biologics

Student Name

Doctor of Business Administration, Thomas Edison State University

HRM-8010: Seminar in Global Human Resource Management

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the program the paper designs, which turns the workforce plan's training strategy into practice.
2

A Technician Academy for Three Countries: Training and Development at Kestrel Biologics

Introduction

Module 1 concluded that Kestrel should build most of its technician supply internally, training manufacturing associates to become bioprocess technicians in about six months. Module 2 set a technician career ladder tied to certification. This assignment designs the training that makes both work, and the development that will produce the next generation of supervisors and managers for three sites. Armstrong and Mitchell (2019) note that training is most effective when it is tied to clear performance standards for the job.

Identifying Needs

Training needs come from three sources. The job analysis defines the tasks technicians perform, such as preparing media, operating bioreactors and documenting each step. Regulatory requirements define what must be trained and recorded under good manufacturing practice. And performance data show where errors occur: deviation reports at the three sites over the past two years point to documentation errors and aseptic technique as the most common causes of lost batches.

Designing Training That Transfers

Salas et al. (2012) reviewed the science of training and concluded that effective programs analyze needs, design practice that resembles the job, provide feedback, and prepare the work environment so trainees use what they learn. Transfer, the use of training on the job, depends heavily on what happens after the classroom: supervisor support, opportunities to practice and accountability.

The simulation suite is the core. Trainees practice aseptic technique and equipment setup repeatedly in a facility that mimics production without risking product, receiving feedback from instructors after every attempt. Certification requires demonstrated competence, not attendance.

Academy phaseContentMethod
Months 1 to 2Biology basics, good manufacturing practice, documentationClassroom and e-learning with tests
Months 3 to 4Aseptic technique, equipment operationSimulation suite with deliberate practice and feedback
Months 5 to 6Supervised production workPaired with a certified technician; competency sign-off
What this page is doingBuilding the program around practice that mirrors the job and support after training applies the research on transfer, rather than treating training as information delivery.
3

Delivering Across Countries

The curriculum, competency standards and certification are global, so a technician certified in Singapore can work in Cork. Delivery is local. Training materials are prepared in English, the working language at all three sites, with key procedures translated into Mandarin and Malay for Singapore trainees whose first language is not English. Singapore's government-supported traineeships and Ireland's apprenticeship arrangements can fund part of the program, so each site's academy is built to meet local certification requirements as well as Kestrel's own.

Leadership Development

Growth to three new lines will create about twenty supervisor and manager roles. Kestrel will run a leadership program for high-potential technicians and engineers: a series of workshops on leading shifts, managing quality issues and coaching, combined with a six-month assignment at another site. Cross-site assignments develop the global perspective the company needs and spread practices between plants, a role Farndale et al. (2010) describe as central to the corporate HR function in global talent management.

Evaluating Results

The academy will be evaluated at four levels: trainee reactions, test results, behavior on the job measured by competency sign-offs and deviation rates, and results measured by batch success and retention of trained technicians. The most important measure is whether lines staffed by academy graduates reach full production as quickly as lines staffed by experienced hires.

Conclusion

The technician academy turns the workforce plan into a supply of qualified people. Designed around practice and transfer, delivered locally against a global standard and evaluated by production results, it supports both quality and growth, while the leadership program prepares the managers the new lines will need.

References

Armstrong, S., & Mitchell, B. (2019). The essential HR handbook: A quick and handy resource for any manager or HR professional. Career Press.

Farndale, E., Scullion, H., & Sparrow, P. (2010). The role of the corporate HR function in global talent management. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.012

Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661

Reading the HRM 8010 Module 3 assignment instructions

The third HRM-8010 written assignment covers training and development in a global organization. Expect questions on identifying training needs, designing training that people use on the job, delivering it across countries and languages, developing future leaders and evaluating results. Draw on training transfer research for a multisite employer, put each answer under its own heading and check the rubric first. At the doctoral level, research evidence on training design and transfer should guide the recommendations rather than general advice. Some terms name one job family for the program. Use performance data to show which skills most need training. Keep the program tied to the plan.

Inside the HRM 8010 Module 3 example

The paper connects training to the earlier workforce plan and job architecture. A needs section draws on job analysis, regulation and performance data. A design section applies a major review of training research and lays out the academy's phases in a table, emphasizing practice and feedback. A delivery section separates global standards from local language and funding. A leadership development section adds cross-site assignments, supported by research on global talent management. An evaluation section sets measures at four levels, ending with production results. Each section builds on the one before it. A table lays out the academy's phases, content and methods. Evaluation reaches production results, not only test scores.

HRM 8010 Module 3 rubric: what earns full marks

Mentors grade this assignment on thorough answers, accurate use of training research, application to an organization and clear organization under headings. Designs that address transfer to the job, not only content, show understanding of what makes training work. Separating global standards from local delivery demonstrates the seminar's global perspective. Evaluation that reaches behavior and results, rather than stopping at satisfaction, earns credit. Scholarly sources appropriate to doctoral work should support the main design choices. Programs that tie certification to demonstrated competence, rather than attendance, show understanding of training effectiveness. Mentors also credit plans that use local funding and certification arrangements. Research on transfer should shape the design.

HRM 8010 Module 3 help: mistakes that cost marks

Students lose points by listing training topics without a needs analysis, by designing classroom programs with no practice or follow-up, or by evaluating only trainee satisfaction. Others ignore language and local certification. Start from performance data. Build practice that mirrors the job. Plan supervisor support after training. Set global standards and local delivery. Judge the program by changed work and business outcomes, not by smiles. Say who will collect each evaluation measure and when. A free first sample on your own HRM-8010 Module 3 organization is available on request. Explain what supervisors will do after training to support transfer, and say how the program will be funded at each site. Set the certification standard before the curriculum. Plan the language of materials for each site.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More HRM 8010 and Doctor of Business Administration sample papers

HRM 8010 Module 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HRM 8010 Module 3 sample paper?

A technician academy and leadership development plan for Kestrel appear above.

What makes training transfer to the job?

Realistic practice, feedback, a supportive supervisor and a quick chance to use the skill.

Should global training be standardized?

Standards and certification can be global, while language, delivery and local funding arrangements are adapted to each country.

How should training be evaluated?

Kirkpatrick's four: how trainees react, what they learn, how they work afterward and what the business gains.

How do cross-site assignments help development?

They build a global perspective, spread practices between locations and prepare managers for roles across the company.