| Course | HRM-7610 Human Resource Management in the 21st Century Global Workplace |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Midterm project: staffing, recruitment and selection in four countries |
| Length | About 984 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | MBA in Human Resource Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HRM 7610 Module 4
Hiring in Four Countries: Staffing, Recruitment and Selection for a Global Device Maker
Student Name
MBA in Human Resource Management, Thomas Edison State University
HRM-7610: Human Resource Management in the 21st Century Global Workplace
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Hiring in Four Countries: Staffing, Recruitment and Selection for a Global Device Maker
Introduction
Lenape Surgical employs people in the United States, Germany, Japan and Ireland and plans a plant in Mexico that will hire about 400 workers. Each country has different labor markets, hiring customs and laws. This midterm project analyzes staffing, recruitment and selection in four of those countries and recommends how the company should source talent across them. It uses the international staffing approaches described by Dowling et al. (2013), research on expatriate selection and each country's legal framework.
The four countries were chosen because they represent the range of conditions the company faces: a coordinated economy with strong employee representation, an economy with distinctive long-term employment norms, an open English-speaking labor market and an emerging manufacturing economy with a reformed labor framework. Comparing them shows which elements of staffing can be standardized and which must follow local practice.
Staffing Approaches
Dowling et al. (2013) describe four approaches to staffing subsidiaries, building on Perlmutter's orientations. An ethnocentric approach fills key positions with parent-country nationals; a polycentric approach uses host-country nationals; a geocentric approach selects the best person regardless of nationality; and a regiocentric approach recruits within a region. Lenape has been mostly ethnocentric, sending American managers to start each subsidiary. The analysis below asks which approach fits each country now.
Germany
Germany's labor market for engineers and skilled technicians is tight, and its dual vocational system produces technicians trained through apprenticeships that combine school and workplace learning. Recruitment relies on job portals, professional networks and university relationships. Selection is formal: employers expect complete application files with certificates, and references (Arbeitszeugnisse) are written in a coded positive language that HR staff must learn to read. The works council has rights of codetermination over personnel selection guidelines and, in firms with more than 20 employees, the right to be informed and to withhold consent to individual hirings on specified grounds. The General Equal Treatment Act prohibits discrimination on grounds including ethnic origin, gender, religion, disability, age and sexual identity. A polycentric approach fits: German managers who understand the works council relationship are more effective than expatriates.
Japan
Large Japanese employers traditionally hire new university graduates in an annual intake each April, recruiting students more than a year before graduation, and develop them through long careers with rotation among departments. Mid-career hiring has grown, but experienced sales and technical staff remain hard to attract to foreign firms, which candidates may see as less stable. Recruitment relies on agencies, referrals and job boards for mid-career hires. Selection emphasizes multiple interviews, attention to attitude and fit with the team, and checks of educational background. A polycentric approach with a Japanese general manager would help recruitment, since local candidates often prefer Japanese leadership.
Ireland
Ireland has an open, English-speaking labor market with many multinational employers, especially in medical technology around Cork and Galway, which creates strong competition for engineers and production staff. Recruitment uses agencies, online job boards, university partnerships and referrals. Selection resembles American practice, with competency-based interviews and reference checks. The Employment Equality Acts prohibit discrimination on nine grounds, including family status and membership of the Traveler community. A geocentric approach fits Ireland well: the plant can be led by the best candidate from any country, and Irish managers can be developed for roles elsewhere in the company.
Mexico
Mexico's manufacturing labor market in industrial regions is competitive, especially where many foreign firms have opened plants. Recruitment for production workers relies on referrals, local job fairs, postings at the plant and agencies, while engineers and managers are recruited through universities and executive search. Selection includes interviews, basic skills tests and medical examinations for physically demanding work. The legal framework changed significantly: the 2019 labor reform strengthened workers' rights to choose their unions and vote on collective agreements and replaced conciliation boards with labor courts, and a 2021 reform largely prohibited subcontracting personnel for a company's core activities. A polycentric approach with a Mexican plant manager and HR manager, supported by experienced staff from Ireland during start-up, fits best.
Comparison
| Country | Staffing approach | Main recruitment channels | Selection norms | Key legal constraint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | Polycentric | Portals, networks, universities | Complete application files; coded references | Works council rights over hiring |
| Japan | Polycentric | Agencies, referrals; April graduate intake | Multiple interviews; team fit | Long-term employment norms |
| Ireland | Geocentric | Agencies, boards, universities | Competency interviews | Equality on nine grounds |
| Mexico | Polycentric with start-up support | Referrals, fairs, universities | Interviews, skills tests, medicals | 2019 and 2021 labor reforms |
Selecting Expatriates
Lenape will still send some people abroad, especially to start the Mexican plant and to develop future leaders. Research shows that technical skill alone does not predict expatriate success. Caligiuri (2000) found that personality traits such as extraversion, agreeableness and emotional stability predicted whether expatriates wanted to stay on assignment and how supervisors rated their performance. Black et al. (1991) showed that adjustment depends on preparation, the job, the organization and the family as well as the individual. Lenape's expatriate selection should therefore assess cross-cultural adaptability and family readiness, not only technical expertise, and should include realistic previews of the assignment.
Recommendations
Lenape should adopt a global framework of common standards, including job-related selection criteria, structured interviews and nondiscrimination, while letting each country use local recruitment channels and legal procedures. It should move from an ethnocentric to a mainly polycentric approach for local leadership, with geocentric selection for regional and global roles. For Mexico, it should hire the plant HR manager first, build relationships with local universities and technical schools, and plan union relations under the new legal framework before the plant opens. Expatriates should be selected for adaptability as well as expertise.
Conclusion
Staffing, recruitment and selection differ substantially across Germany, Japan, Ireland and Mexico in labor markets, customs and law. A global framework with local practice, a shift toward host-country leadership and careful expatriate selection would let Lenape source talent effectively as it grows.
References
Black, J. S., Mendenhall, M., & Oddou, G. (1991). Toward a comprehensive model of international adjustment: An integration of multiple theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278938
Caligiuri, P. M. (2000). The Big Five personality characteristics as predictors of expatriate's desire to terminate the assignment and supervisor-rated performance. Personnel Psychology, 53(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00194.x
Dowling, P. J., Festing, M., & Engle, A. D. (2013). International human resource management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.
Reading the HRM 7610 Module 4 assignment instructions
For a fifth of the HRM-7610 grade, the midterm compares how staffing, recruitment and selection work in four countries; the full instructions sit in Module 4. Expect to compare how organizations staff, recruit and select in each country, including labor market conditions, customs, legal constraints and the staffing approaches described in the text. Choose countries that differ enough to make the comparison useful, research each with credible sources and present the comparison clearly, ideally in a table. Recommend how a multinational operating in all four should source talent. APA style applies. Choose countries you can research with credible sources in English or with reliable translations.
How this HRM 7610 Module 4 example is built
The project opens with a firm that operates in all four countries. A section explains the four staffing approaches from the text. Four country sections each cover the labor market, recruitment channels, selection norms and legal constraints, ending with the staffing approach that fits. A comparison table summarizes the four countries. A section on expatriate selection draws on personality and adjustment research. Recommendations set a global framework with local practice and specific steps for the planned plant. Each country section uses the same structure, which makes the comparison easy to follow. Each country section ends with a recommended staffing approach, and a final section turns the comparison into a global framework with local practice for the firm.
Where the marks sit in the HRM 7610 Module 4 rubric
The midterm is graded on accurate analysis of staffing, recruitment and selection in each country, use of the text's staffing approaches, the quality of research, the clarity of the comparison and practical recommendations. Mentors look for country-specific detail, such as legal requirements and recruitment customs, rather than general statements. A consistent structure across countries and a summary table show organization. Recommendations that follow from the comparison and address a real firm's needs demonstrate applied understanding. Mentors also value expatriate selection grounded in research, since international staffing includes both local hiring and the choice of who to send abroad. Recommendations for the firm's next market show the analysis has a purpose.
HRM 7610 Module 4 help from the desk
Midterm projects lose points when country sections are uneven, when legal information is missing or out of date, or when the paper describes countries without recommending anything. Others choose four similar countries, which weakens the comparison. Use the same headings for each country. Check labor law with current sources. Include a comparison table. Recommend a staffing approach for each country and explain why. A free first sample of your own HRM-7610 midterm project is available on request. Cite current legal sources for each country, since employment law changes. One row per country in the comparison table is enough. Explain how the firm will select expatriates, not only local hires.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HRM 7610 and MBA in Human Resource Management sample papers
- HRM 7610 Module 1: Discussion: Culture and the Limits of a Global HR Policy
- HRM 7610 Module 2: Written Assignment: Structuring HR for a Growing Multinational
- HRM 7610 Module 3: Discussion: The People Side of a Cross-Border Acquisition
- HRM 7610 Module 5: Written Assignment: Managing Performance Across Borders
- HRM 7610 Module 6: Discussion: Bringing Expatriates Home Without Losing Them
- HRM 7610 Module 7: Written Assignment: Paying an Expatriate and a Local Team Fairly
- HRM 7610 Module 8: Final Project: Entering Mexico, Macroeconomics, HR Practice and Risk
- HRM 7630 Module 2: Discussion: What Muldrow Means for Transfers and Assignments
- HRM 7620 Module 2: Written Assignment: Building Inclusive Talent Practices
- HRM 7640 Module 3: Written Assignment: A Logistic Model of Ninety-Day Turnover
HRM 7610 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HRM 7610 Module 4 sample paper?
The complete midterm project comparing staffing, recruitment and selection in Germany, Japan, Ireland and Mexico is above.
What is the HRM-7610 midterm project?
An analysis of the staffing, recruitment and selection functions in four different countries, worth 20 percent of the grade.
What are the four international staffing approaches?
Ethnocentric, polycentric, geocentric and regiocentric, which differ in whether key positions go to parent-country, host-country or any nationals.
What predicts expatriate success?
Studies point beyond technical skill to traits such as emotional stability and agreeableness, to the support given for adjustment and to whether the family is ready.
How do German works councils affect hiring?
They have rights over personnel selection guidelines and, in larger firms, can withhold consent to individual hirings on specified grounds.