| Course | HRM-6000 Managing the Human Resources Enterprise |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Module 2 written assignment: summary paper on engagement and employer branding |
| Length | About 579 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Master of Science in Human Resources Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HRM 6000 Module 2
Engaged Staff, Better Stays: Engagement and the Employer Brand at Atlantic Shore Hospitality
Student Name
Master of Science in Human Resources Management, Thomas Edison State University
HRM-6000: Managing the Human Resources Enterprise
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Engaged Staff, Better Stays: Engagement and the Employer Brand at Atlantic Shore Hospitality
Why This Briefing Now
Our annual survey placed employee engagement at 58 out of 100, below the hospitality benchmark our survey vendor reports, and our ratings on employer review sites average 3.1 out of 5, with frequent complaints about schedules and managers. Guest comments mention the same themes. This summary explains why engagement and our employer brand matter to revenue and recommends how to improve both.
What Engagement Is and Why It Matters
Kahn (1990) saw engagement as people investing their bodies, minds and feelings in their roles, and named three conditions it needs: work that feels meaningful, a sense of safety and the personal availability to commit. Saks (2006) found that job characteristics, perceived organizational and supervisor support, rewards, recognition and fairness predicted engagement, and that engagement in turn predicted job satisfaction, commitment and intention to stay.
Engagement matters because it shows up in business results. Harter et al. (2002) compared nearly 8,000 units across many companies and found that where engagement was higher, customers were happier, output and profit were stronger, and quits and accidents were fewer. In a hotel, where guests interact with dozens of employees during a stay, these links are direct: a disengaged front desk agent or room attendant affects the guest's experience and our ratings.
Our Drivers
Our survey comments point to three drivers that match the research. Unpredictable schedules undermine availability, the condition Kahn described, because employees cannot plan their lives. Inconsistent supervision undermines perceived support and fairness, which Saks identified. Limited recognition for good guest service undermines the sense that work is noticed and valued.
The Employer Brand
Backhaus and Tikoo (2004) defined employer branding as building a distinct identity as an employer, communicated to current and potential employees, that differentiates the organization from competitors. An employer brand is what people believe it is like to work for us, shaped by what employees say on review sites, social media and in their communities. Ours currently says that Atlantic Shore pays fairly but schedules unpredictably and manages inconsistently. No advertising can overcome that if it reflects employees' experience.
How Engagement and Brand Connect
Engagement and employer brand are two views of the same experience. Engaged employees describe their work positively, refer friends and stay, which strengthens the brand and lowers recruiting costs. A strong brand attracts candidates who know what to expect and fit the work, which supports engagement. The reverse cycle is also true, and we are currently in it: disengagement produces negative reviews, which make recruiting harder, which leaves departments short-staffed, which worsens schedules and engagement.
Recommendations
| Action | Driver addressed | Measure |
|---|---|---|
| Post schedules three weeks ahead and allow shift swaps by app | Availability | Engagement items on scheduling |
| Train supervisors in coaching and fair scheduling; review them on team engagement | Support and fairness | Supervisor ratings in the survey |
| Recognize guest service praised in reviews, by name, within a week | Recognition | Number of recognitions; engagement score |
| Define our employer promise with employees and use it in hiring | Brand | Employer review ratings; applicants per opening |
| Ask employees who stay what keeps them, each quarter | Engagement and retention | Stay interview themes; turnover |
Conclusion
Our engagement and employer brand are weak for the same reasons: unpredictable schedules, inconsistent supervision and limited recognition. Research links engagement to the customer and financial results we care about. Acting on the drivers employees name, and then telling the true story of working here, will strengthen both.
References
Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430410550754
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
Reading the HRM 6000 Module 2 assignment instructions
The second HRM-6000 written assignment is an executive summary on employee engagement and organizational branding. Expect to explain what engagement is, why it matters to business results, what drives it, what an employer brand is and how the two relate, then recommend actions for an organization. Executives want evidence that the topic affects outcomes they care about, so use research that links engagement to customers, productivity or turnover. Pull journal articles from the library databases, apply them to an organization's survey results or situation, and keep the briefing short, ending with recommendations. If your organization runs an engagement survey, use its results; if not, use exit interviews or employer review sites as evidence of how employees describe their experience.
How the HRM 6000 Module 2 example is put together
The summary opens with the organization's own survey score and employer ratings. A section defines engagement from two foundational studies and links it to business results with meta-analytic evidence. A short section matches the organization's survey themes to research drivers. A section defines employer branding and shows that the current brand repeats the same themes. A section explains the cycle connecting engagement and brand. A table recommends five actions, each with the driver it addresses and a measure. The executive format keeps every section short and tied to a decision. Each recommendation in the table is paired with the driver it addresses and a measure, so executives can see how progress will be judged.
Reading the HRM 6000 Module 2 grading rubric
Engagement briefings are judged on a correct grasp of engagement and branding concepts, use of research, relevance and clarity for executives, and the quality of recommendations. Answers that tie engagement to measurable business outcomes and recommend actions with measures earn the most credit. Recognizing that an employer brand reflects employees' actual experience, rather than marketing, shows insight. Sound sources and polished writing account for the remaining marks. Keep the paper focused on what executives should decide. Mentors also credit summaries that explain the reinforcing cycle between engagement and the employer brand, since it shows why action on one helps the other. Using the organization's own survey data, rather than general statistics, makes the recommendations persuasive to executives. Sources should be peer-reviewed where possible.
HRM 6000 Module 2 help from the desk
Students lose points by treating engagement as satisfaction, by recommending perks unrelated to the drivers their organization faces or by describing employer branding as recruitment advertising alone. Others give executives theory without a link to results. Define engagement with research. Use your organization's data to identify drivers. Show how engagement affects business outcomes. Give each recommendation a measure. Describe your organization's engagement data and we will write a first sample on it for free. Avoid recommending a rebranding campaign before the employee experience changes. Match each action to a driver your data reveal. Aim for a ten-minute read and set the recommendations out so executives can approve them one by one.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HRM 6000 and Master of Science in Human Resources Management sample papers
- HRM 6000 Module 1: Written Assignment: Social Networks and HR Risk for the Executive Team
- HRM 6000 Module 3: Written Assignment: Talent Management and HR Technology
- HRM 6000 Module 4: Written Assignment: Keeping Staff and Measuring What HR Does
- HRM 6000 Module 5: Written Assignment: A Changing Workforce and Alternative Staffing
- HRM 6000 Module 6: Final Project: How Effective Is HR at Atlantic Shore Hospitality?
- HRM 5500 Module 2: Written Assignment: Job Analysis for a Warehouse Shift Supervisor
- HRM 5400 Module 6: Final Project: A Best Practice Proposal for Total Rewards
- HRM 5600 Module 4: Final Project: A Learning System for Entrepreneurial Behavior
- HRM 6100 Module 5: Written Assignment: Separation, Retention and Employment Law at Costco
HRM 6000 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HRM 6000 Module 2 sample paper?
Above is the engagement and branding briefing for the hotel group, from its survey score to five actions with measures.
What is employee engagement?
The degree to which employees invest their physical, cognitive and emotional energy in their work, as first described by Kahn.
Does employee engagement affect business results?
Yes. Across thousands of business units, more engaged teams showed happier customers, better productivity and profit, and fewer departures.
What is employer branding?
Building and communicating a distinct identity as an employer that shapes how current and potential employees see the organization.
How are engagement and employer brand related?
Engaged employees speak well of their employer and stay, strengthening the brand, which in turn attracts candidates who fit the work.