| Course | HRM-5500 Strategic Recruitment and Selection |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Module 2 written assignment: job and work analysis |
| Length | About 734 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Master of Science in Human Resources Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HRM 5500 Module 2
From Tasks to Criteria: Job Analysis for Raritan Logistics' Shift Supervisors
Student Name
Master of Science in Human Resources Management, Thomas Edison State University
HRM-5500: Strategic Recruitment and Selection
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
From Tasks to Criteria: Job Analysis for Raritan Logistics' Shift Supervisors
Introduction
Selection is only as good as its criteria, and criteria come from understanding the job. O'Meara and Petzall (2013) place job and work analysis at the start of the recruitment and selection system because every later step, from the job ad to the interview questions, depends on it. Raritan Logistics hires about 40 shift supervisors a year across six warehouses. Half of new supervisors leave or are demoted within two years. This assignment analyzes the job and uses the results to set criteria and a staffing strategy.
Methods of Analysis
No single method captures a job completely, so four were combined. An analyst observed supervisors on day and night shifts in two buildings, recording what they did in fifteen-minute intervals. Six supervisors and four operations managers were interviewed about the job's purpose, decisions and difficulties. A task inventory listing 46 tasks was completed by all 38 current supervisors, who rated each task's frequency and importance. Finally, managers described critical incidents, specific examples of especially good and poor supervisor performance, which revealed what separates success from failure.
The combination balances breadth and depth. The inventory reaches every incumbent and produces data that can be analyzed; observation shows the real work rather than the described work; interviews and critical incidents explain why tasks matter. The analysis also considered work analysis, the broader context of the job, because supervisors increasingly manage temporary workers and a warehouse management system rather than a stable crew.
Results: Essential Tasks
Tasks rated high on both frequency and importance were treated as essential.
| Essential task | Share of supervisors rating it daily |
|---|---|
| Assign associates to zones and adjust staffing during the shift | 100% |
| Monitor productivity and accuracy in the warehouse management system | 97% |
| Enforce safety rules and respond to incidents | 95% |
| Coach and correct associates on performance and attendance | 89% |
| Coordinate with inbound and outbound teams and carriers | 87% |
| Onboard new and temporary associates | 74% |
| Resolve conflicts among associates | 68% |
| Report shift results to the operations manager | 100% |
Results: Competencies
The critical incidents showed that the supervisors who failed rarely lacked technical knowledge; most had been strong associates. They failed at managing people under time pressure. Six competencies emerged.
| Competency | Evidence from the analysis | Selection method |
|---|---|---|
| Planning and prioritizing under pressure | Incidents of missed trucks after poor zone assignments | Situational judgment test |
| Coaching and giving feedback | Turnover on crews of supervisors who avoided correction | Structured behavioral interview |
| Safety judgment | Incidents of injuries after shortcuts were tolerated | Situational judgment test and reference checks |
| Data use | Reliance on the warehouse management system dashboards | Work sample using a mock dashboard |
| Communication with diverse crews | Crews with temporary and multilingual workers | Structured interview and role play |
| Reliability | Supervisors are the escalation point for the shift | Reference checks and attendance history |
From Analysis to Staffing Strategy
The analysis changes how Raritan should fill the role. Current practice promotes the most productive associates. But productivity as an associate predicts only part of supervisory success, and promoting the best associates can lose a top performer and gain a weak supervisor. The new strategy has three parts.
First, look internally first, but select internally with the same criteria used for outside candidates. An internal pipeline keeps institutional knowledge and rewards associates, and a twelve-week lead associate program will let candidates practice supervisory tasks before applying. Second, recruit externally for about half the openings, targeting supervisors from retail distribution and manufacturing, with job ads that describe the real shift patterns and the people side of the job. Third, use a common selection process built on the six competencies for every candidate, which supports consistency and defensibility under the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, which expect selection procedures to be related to the job (29 C.F.R. § 1607.5).
Expected Results
If the new process raises two-year supervisor retention from 50 to 75 percent, Raritan would replace 10 fewer supervisors a year. Research supports the approach: structured, job-related interviews predict performance substantially better than unstructured ones (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998), and the critical incidents provide the content for those structured questions.
Conclusion
Job analysis revealed that the supervisor role is mainly a people and planning job in a data-driven warehouse, not a promotion for productive associates. Turning eight essential tasks and six competencies into selection methods and an internal-first strategy gives Raritan a hiring process aligned with what the job requires.
References
O'Meara, B., & Petzall, S. (2013). The handbook of strategic recruitment and selection: A systems approach. Emerald Group Publishing.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 29 C.F.R. § 1607 (1978).
Reading the HRM 5500 Module 2 assignment instructions
HRM-5500 has only two written assignments, and together they carry 35 percent of the grade, so each one is substantial. The Module 2 assignment asks you to analyze the role and uses of job and work analysis in selection and to apply it to a job, producing selection criteria and a staffing strategy that meets an organization's objectives. Expect to describe analysis methods, report tasks and competencies, connect them to selection methods and propose a strategy. Use the textbook's systems approach and outside research, present results in tables where they help and cite in APA style. Expect the second written assignment and the final project to build on this analysis, so choose a job you can follow through the course.
How this HRM 5500 Module 2 example is built
The introduction states the job, the hiring volume and the problem with current supervisors. A methods section explains four analysis methods and why they were combined, including the broader work context. A table lists essential tasks with frequency data, and a second table derives six competencies from critical incidents and maps each to a selection method. The strategy section challenges the practice of promoting top associates and proposes internal-first selection with common criteria, external recruiting and legal defensibility. A short section estimates the effect on retention, supported by research on structured interviews. The strategy section questions a common practice, promoting the best workers, using evidence from the analysis.
HRM 5500 Module 2 rubric: what earns full marks
For this paper mentors weigh four things: whether job and work analysis are explained correctly, how good the analysis of the chosen job is, whether its findings become selection criteria, and whether the staffing strategy suits the employer. Answers that show how each competency will be measured earn more than lists of duties. Using several methods and explaining their strengths shows depth. Connecting the strategy to legal requirements and research support adds credit. Because this is one of only two written assignments, mentors expect a thorough, well-organized paper in APA style. Answers that use several analysis methods and explain why also show awareness of reliability and validity in job analysis. Mentors look for a staffing strategy that states sources, criteria and how the process meets organizational objectives.
HRM 5500 Module 2 help: mistakes that cost marks
Students lose points by copying a job description and calling it a job analysis, by listing competencies with no evidence for them, or by stopping before the staffing strategy. Others choose selection methods that do not measure the competency they claim to. Use more than one analysis method. Show where each competency came from. Map each competency to a method that measures it. Explain how the strategy meets the organization's goals. A free first sample using your own HRM-5500 Module 2 job is available on request. Show the analysis data, such as frequency ratings, rather than only the conclusions. Avoid adding requirements, such as degrees, that the analysis does not support.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HRM 5500 and Master of Science in Human Resources Management sample papers
- HRM 5500 Module 1: Discussion: Recruitment and Selection as One System
- HRM 5500 Module 3: Discussion: Which Hiring Data Actually Matter?
- HRM 5500 Module 4: Discussion: Choosing Tests That Predict and Treat Candidates Fairly
- HRM 5500 Module 5: Discussion: Fit to the Job, the Team or the Company?
- HRM 5500 Module 6: Written Assignment: A Selection Checklist for Shift Supervisors
- HRM 5500 Module 7: Discussion: Continuous Improvement in Hiring
- HRM 5500 Module 8: Final Project: A Business Case for Strategic Hiring With a Budget
- HRM 5700 Module 3: Written Assignment: Learning From Projects and From Clients
- HRM 6000 Module 4: Written Assignment: Keeping Staff and Measuring What HR Does
- HRM 5400 Module 6: Final Project: A Best Practice Proposal for Total Rewards
- HRM 5600 Module 1: Written Assignment: Adult Learning and What Blocks It
HRM 5500 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HRM 5500 Module 2 sample paper?
The complete job analysis for Raritan Logistics' shift supervisor is above, with tasks, competencies mapped to selection methods and a staffing strategy.
What is the difference between job analysis and work analysis?
Job analysis studies a specific job's tasks and requirements; work analysis looks more broadly at how work is organized and changing.
What are critical incidents in job analysis?
Specific examples of especially effective or ineffective performance, used to identify what separates success from failure in a job.
Why is job analysis important for selection?
It identifies what the job requires, which defines the criteria and methods selection should use and supports legal defensibility.
Should top performers be promoted to supervisor?
Not automatically; success as an individual worker predicts only part of supervisory success, so candidates should be assessed on supervisory competencies.