HRM 5700 Module 4 Written Assignment: Knowledge Loss as a Project Risk Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This HRM 5700 Module 4 example answers the written assignment on problem solving and project and risk management in The Effectiveness of a Market-Connected Culture, a course in TESU's Master of Science in Human Resources Management. HRM-5700 asks in this module how organizations solve problems and manage project risks, including the risks that lie in knowledge. The sample examines an eight-week delay at Meridian BioLabs, the composite New Brunswick contract research lab, after the scientist who developed a key method retired. It uses root cause analysis to trace the delay to undocumented knowledge, builds a knowledge loss risk register that scores critical roles by likelihood and impact, and sets out responses in which human resources plays the central part.

CourseHRM-5700 The Effectiveness of a Market-Connected Culture
ModuleModule 4
Paper typeModule 4 written assignment: problem solving and project and risk management
LengthAbout 711 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramMaster of Science in Human Resources Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HRM 5700 Module 4

1

When the Expert Retires: Root Causes and a Knowledge Loss Risk Register

Student Name

Master of Science in Human Resources Management, Thomas Edison State University

HRM-5700: The Effectiveness of a Market-Connected Culture

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the failure that prompts the analysis and the tool the paper builds to prevent it from recurring.
2

When the Expert Retires: Root Causes and a Knowledge Loss Risk Register

Introduction

In March, a bioanalytical study for one of Meridian's largest clients slipped eight weeks. The method for measuring the client's compound in plasma had been developed by a senior scientist who retired in January. Her successor, working from the written method, could not reproduce the validation results. The client was not told about the delay until the original deadline had passed. This assignment applies problem solving and risk management to the incident and to the broader risk it revealed.

Root Cause Analysis

The five whys technique asks why a problem occurred and then asks why again of each answer until a root cause appears.

The root cause is not the successor's skill or the method document but the absence of any process for identifying and managing knowledge risk. DeLong (2004) describes this pattern as lost knowledge: organizations notice what an expert knew only after the expert is gone, when recovering it is slow and costly.

QuestionAnswer
Why did the study slip?The method could not be reproduced on schedule
Why could it not be reproduced?Critical steps were not in the written method
Why were they missing?The developer adjusted sample preparation by experience and never wrote the adjustments down
Why was this not caught before she retired?No process identified her knowledge as critical or arranged transfer
Why was there no process?Knowledge loss was not treated as a project or business risk

A Second Failure: Communication

The analysis also found a communication failure. The project manager hoped the problem would be solved quickly and delayed telling the client. This turned a technical problem into a relationship problem, damaging the relational capital discussed in Module 2. Problem solving in a client service firm must include early, honest communication. The episode also confirms research on project learning: knowledge that is not captured while a team is together tends to be lost when the team breaks up (Schindler & Eppler, 2003).

What this page is doingSeparating the technical root cause from the communication failure shows that one incident can reveal two different system weaknesses.
3

Knowledge Loss as a Risk

Project risk management identifies risks, assesses their likelihood and impact, and plans responses (Project Management Institute, 2021). The same approach can be applied to knowledge. Meridian's HR and scientific leaders reviewed six roles and scored each on a five-point scale for the likelihood of losing the role's knowledge in the next two years and the impact of that loss.

Scores above 12 require an active transfer plan within three months. The responses mix the strategies DeLong describes: transferring knowledge through pairing and mentoring, codifying it through documents and recordings, and retaining people through phased retirement or consulting arrangements.

RoleLikelihoodImpactScoreResponse
Senior bioanalytical scientist4520Pair with successor for six months
Quality assurance lead3515Document audit history; cross-train deputy
Stability testing specialist4312Record methods on video with commentary
Laboratory information system administrator2510Vendor support agreement and runbook
Statistician for clinical assays339Shared code repository with notes
Client relationship manager248Joint client meetings with a second manager

The Role of Human Resources

Knowledge risk is a workforce issue, and human resources owns many of the tools. HR can identify retirement eligibility and flight risk, build succession plans that include knowledge transfer rather than only job titles, design phased retirement so experts can work part time while mentoring successors, and include knowledge transfer goals in experts' performance plans. HR can also make exit processes include structured knowledge capture interviews. At Meridian, the retired scientist would have been willing to work two days a week for six months; no one asked.

Recommendations

Meridian should maintain a knowledge loss risk register reviewed quarterly by HR and scientific leaders, require transfer plans for high-scoring roles, add knowledge risk to the risk assessment of every major study and adopt a rule that clients are informed of any expected delay within two business days.

Conclusion

The delayed study was a symptom of an unmanaged risk. Root cause analysis showed that the lab had no way to identify and transfer critical knowledge. Treating knowledge loss as a risk, scoring it and assigning responses, with HR leading the workforce side, would prevent the next expert's retirement from becoming the next client's delay.

References

DeLong, D. W. (2004). Lost knowledge: Confronting the threat of an aging workforce. Oxford University Press.

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.).

Schindler, M., & Eppler, M. J. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: A review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21(3), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00096-0

HRM 5700 Module 4 instructions, in plain terms

The fourth HRM-5700 written assignment covers problem solving and project and risk management. Expect questions that ask you to analyze a problem using a structured method, identify and assess risks and propose responses, and some versions use a case study. In this course the focus is on knowledge and people, so expect to consider how knowledge loss, communication and culture create project risk. Apply scholarly sources and recognized methods, such as root cause analysis and risk registers, to a specific incident or organization. Write in APA style. Choose an incident with a clear consequence, such as a delay or error, so the root cause analysis has a definite starting point. If the assignment uses a case, apply the methods to the case facts rather than to your own organization.

How this HRM 5700 Module 4 example is built

The paper begins with a specific incident and its consequences. A five whys table traces the delay to a root cause, and the paper explains it with research on lost knowledge. A short section identifies a separate communication failure. A risk register table scores six roles and assigns responses, with a threshold for action. A section defines human resources' role, and recommendations close the paper. The structure moves from one incident to a system for preventing similar ones. The register uses a defined scale and a threshold for action, which makes the scoring transparent and repeatable.

HRM 5700 Module 4 rubric: what earns full marks

This paper is judged on the problem solving and risk methods used, how far the analysis digs, whether the recommendations could be carried out and how well the sources support them. Answers that reach a systemic root cause, rather than blaming an individual, show the analysis expected. A risk register with clear scoring and responses demonstrates applied skill. Connecting the problem to human resources practice reflects the program's focus. Clear tables and APA citations help the grade. Mentors also credit answers that separate technical and human causes and address both. Responses that combine transfer, documentation and retention show an understanding of the range of options. Including communication with clients or stakeholders in problem solving shows awareness of the organization's market, the theme of the course. Sources on knowledge loss and project risk should both appear.

Common HRM 5700 Module 4 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Students lose points by stopping root cause analysis at a person's error, by listing risks without scoring them or by proposing responses with no owner or deadline. Others ignore communication with clients or stakeholders. Ask why until you reach a process or system cause. Score likelihood and impact on a defined scale. Assign responses and thresholds. Name HR's tools. A free first sample using your own HRM-5700 Module 4 incident is available on request. Avoid ending the five whys at a person's mistake. Score risks consistently. Assign every response an owner and a deadline. Explain how HR's tools, such as succession planning and phased retirement, fit into project risk management rather than sitting apart from it.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More HRM 5700 and Master of Science in Human Resources Management sample papers

HRM 5700 Module 4 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HRM 5700 Module 4 sample paper?

You can read the whole risk paper above, including the five whys table and a knowledge loss register covering six roles.

What is the five whys technique?

A root cause method that asks why a problem occurred, then asks why again of each answer until a system cause appears.

What is a risk register?

A record of identified risks with their likelihood, impact, score, owner and planned response.

What is knowledge loss risk?

The risk that critical knowledge leaves an organization when employees retire, resign or move, often noticed only afterward.

How can HR reduce knowledge loss?

Through succession plans that include knowledge transfer, phased retirement, mentoring, knowledge goals and structured exit interviews.