HRM 6100 Module 3 Written Assignment: Training, Development and Performance at Costco Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This HRM 6100 Module 3 example answers the written assignment on strategic training, development and performance management in Human Resources as a Strategic Partner, a course in TESU's Master of Science in Human Resources Management. HRM-6100 links each written assignment to the company chosen at the start, Costco in this sample, through an incident tied to the module's functions. In the illustrative case, a cashier with nine years of strong work struggles after promotion to lead the people who were her peers. It explains why promotion from within makes development essential, applies Kirkpatrick's levels to evaluate training and research on feedback to performance management, and sets out a ninety-day plan that supports the supervisor and protects the strategy.

CourseHRM-6100 Human Resources as a Strategic Partner
ModuleModule 3
Paper typeModule 3 written assignment: training, development and performance management
LengthAbout 669 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramMaster of Science in Human Resources Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HRM 6100 Module 3

1

From Peer to Supervisor: Development and Performance Management at Costco

Student Name

Master of Science in Human Resources Management, Thomas Edison State University

HRM-6100: Human Resources as a Strategic Partner

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the transition that tests a promotion-from-within strategy, the move from colleague to manager.
2

From Peer to Supervisor: Development and Performance Management at Costco

The Promotion That Went Wrong

The incident used here is illustrative. Maria, a cashier with nine years at a Costco warehouse and consistently strong performance, was promoted to front-end supervisor. Three months later, wait times at the registers have risen, two cashiers have complained that she plays favorites, and she has told her manager she is not sure she wants the job. The warehouse manager asks HR how to respond.

Why Development Matters in a Promotion-From-Within Strategy

Costco fills most management positions from within, as discussed in Module 2. This practice builds loyalty and preserves the culture, but it creates a predictable challenge: excellent individual contributors are promoted into roles that require different skills, such as delegating, giving feedback and handling conflict among people who were recently peers. If development does not accompany promotion, the company risks losing a good cashier and gaining a struggling supervisor. Development is therefore not a separate HR program but a condition for the staffing strategy to work. Ton (2014) notes that companies investing in employees also invest in the training that makes promotion from within work, which is the investment this incident tests.

Training That Builds Supervisory Skill

Strategic training is designed to produce behaviors the strategy requires and is evaluated by results, not attendance. Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick (2006) described four levels of training evaluation: reaction, learning, behavior and results. Many organizations measure only the first two. For new supervisors, the levels that matter are behavior, whether the supervisor actually delegates and gives feedback on the floor, and results, whether register wait times and team turnover improve. A supervisor training program should be judged on those levels.

For Maria, training should focus on three skills: scheduling and deploying cashiers by demand, giving feedback to former peers, and handling complaints of unfairness through consistent, transparent decisions. Short sessions combined with practice on the floor and coaching from an experienced supervisor are more likely to change behavior than a single classroom course.

Performance Management

Performance management connects individual goals to the business and provides feedback that helps people improve. Feedback is not automatically helpful: pooling hundreds of studies, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) found that roughly one feedback intervention in three made performance worse, most often when it pointed at the person instead of the task. Feedback for Maria should focus on specific behaviors and results, such as how she assigns registers at peak times, rather than on general judgments of whether she is "cut out for management."

What this page is doingUsing the feedback meta-analysis to shape how the manager talks to the supervisor applies research to the incident rather than citing it in general terms.
3

A Ninety-Day Plan

The plan sets clear expectations, provides support and measures progress. If Maria still wants to return to her cashier role after ninety days, the company should allow it without penalty, which preserves an experienced employee and signals that development is supported rather than forced.

PeriodDevelopmentPerformance measures
Days 1 to 30Pair with an experienced front-end supervisor from another warehouse; training on demand-based schedulingRegister wait times at peak; schedule accuracy
Days 31 to 60Coaching on feedback conversations; practice with the warehouse manager observingTeam feedback on fairness; number of coaching conversations held
Days 61 to 90Lead a team meeting on register standards; review progress with managerWait times back to warehouse standard; no new fairness complaints

Lessons for the Company

The incident suggests three improvements. First, prepare promotion candidates before they are promoted, through a short supervisory development program for employees identified as ready. Second, assign every new supervisor a mentor from another warehouse for the first ninety days. Third, evaluate supervisor training at the behavior and results levels, tracking measures such as team turnover and service times. These steps make Costco's promotion from within more reliable.

Conclusion

Maria's difficulty is a predictable result of promoting strong performers without preparing them for supervision. A strategic approach links training to the behaviors the role requires, uses feedback that focuses on tasks, and evaluates development by its effect on performance. For Costco, investing in new supervisors protects the strategy of promoting from within.

References

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

Ton, Z. (2014). The good jobs strategy: How the smartest companies invest in employees to lower costs and boost profits. New Harvest.

Reading the HRM 6100 Module 3 assignment instructions

The third HRM-6100 written assignment covers the strategic implementation of training, development and performance management at the company you selected. Expect an incident to analyze, such as a performance problem or a development gap, and questions about how training and performance management support strategy. Use research on training evaluation and feedback, apply it to the company's practices and the incident, and recommend actions with measures. Since the assignments prepare you for the final project, connect your analysis to the five HR functions you chose. Cite all sources in APA style. Choose or interpret the incident so that it reveals a gap in the system, not only an individual's weakness, since the course emphasizes strategic implementation.

How the HRM 6100 Module 3 example is put together

The paper presents the incident, then explains why promotion from within makes development essential. A training section applies Kirkpatrick's four levels and names the skills the new supervisor needs. A performance management section uses a feedback meta-analysis to shape how feedback should be given. A table sets a ninety-day plan with development steps and measures for each period. A section draws three lessons for the company. The argument widens from one supervisor to the promotion system that put her there. The ninety-day plan sets measures for each period, making the development effort accountable.

HRM 6100 Module 3 rubric: what earns full marks

Mentors weigh how deeply the incident is analyzed, use of training and performance management concepts, research support and practical recommendations. Answers that connect the incident to the company's strategy, such as promotion from within, show strategic thinking. A plan with defined measures, evaluated at the behavior and results levels, demonstrates applied skill. Research on feedback or training evaluation should shape recommendations, not decorate them. Orderly structure and correct citations complete the mark. Mentors also value recommendations that change the system, such as preparing candidates before promotion, alongside help for the individual. Evaluating training by changes in behavior and results, rather than satisfaction, shows a strategic view of development. Research should be used to guide specific actions.

HRM 6100 Module 3 help from the desk

Students lose points by treating the incident as a personality problem, by recommending training without measures or by ignoring the company's practices. Others cite evaluation models but measure only satisfaction. Explain the system cause behind the individual case. Define the skills needed. Give feedback guidance based on research. Set measures at the behavior and results levels. Recommend changes to the system, not only for one person. A free first sample using your own HRM-6100 company is available on request. Avoid recommending a training course without saying how its effect will be measured. Base feedback guidance on research about what makes feedback help. Allow for the possibility that the person is not suited to the role, and say how the company would handle that fairly.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More HRM 6100 and Master of Science in Human Resources Management sample papers

HRM 6100 Module 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HRM 6100 Module 3 sample paper?

The full Module 3 paper on developing a newly promoted Costco supervisor is above, with training evaluation, feedback research and a ninety-day plan.

What are Kirkpatrick's four levels?

Reaction, learning, behavior and results, a model for evaluating training from participants' views to its effect on outcomes.

Does feedback always improve performance?

No. No. No. In the large review by Kluger and DeNisi, roughly a third of feedback efforts hurt performance, mostly when the feedback was about the person and not the task.

Why do promoted employees struggle as supervisors?

Supervision requires different skills, such as delegating and managing former peers, that strong individual performers may not yet have.

What is strategic performance management?

Linking individual goals and feedback to the organization's strategy and measuring the results that matter to it.