HCM 5020 Module 5 Final Project Part 1 Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This HCM 5020 Module 5 example is Part One of the course's final project, in which the healthcare leader becomes an educator: an imaging director plans MRI safety training for nurses, transporters, rapid response staff and security officers at a composite New Jersey hospital. Healthcare Administrator Leadership, the TESU course behind this sample, belongs to the Master of Science in Healthcare Management, and Part One falls midway through the term. The paper explains the magnet hazard, uses nine near misses to justify the topic, analyzes four audiences, sets five measurable objectives in a table, writes opening, middle and closing discussion questions and summarizes three sources. In the catalog the course is HCM-5020.

CourseHCM-5020 Healthcare Administrator Leadership
ModuleModule 5
Paper typeFinal project, Part 1: training plan and preliminary research
LengthAbout 1,095 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramMaster of Science in Healthcare Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HCM 5020 Module 5

1

Nothing Metal Past the Door: Planning MRI Safety Training for the Staff Who Bring Patients to the Scanner

Student Name

Master of Science in Healthcare Management, Thomas Edison State University

HCM-5020: Healthcare Administrator Leadership

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the training's core rule in plain words. The subtitle names the audience, which is the first thing Part One of the project asks the student to define.
2

Nothing Metal Past the Door: Planning MRI Safety Training for the Staff Who Bring Patients to the Scanner

The final project for this course asks the healthcare leader to act as an educator: to choose a topic on which staff need training, define who will be trained, prepare objectives and discussion questions and begin the research that will support the session. Leading imaging at an invented 260-bed New Jersey hospital, I have chosen MRI safety for staff outside the imaging department. Part One, presented here, explains why this topic matters, analyzes the audience, sets out learning objectives and discussion questions and summarizes the first sources I will use. Part Two will turn this plan into a presentation of at least ten slides with speaker notes, plus a single-page handout.

Why This Topic

An MRI scanner's magnet is always on, even when no scan is running. Its field can pull ferromagnetic objects such as oxygen cylinders, scissors, pulse oximeter clips or a wheelchair into the bore with enough force to injure or kill anyone in the way, and it can heat, move or disable implanted devices. Most imaging departments control these risks through screening, physical barriers and zones of restricted access. The staff most likely to breach those controls, however, are not technologists. They are the nurses who escort inpatients, the transporters who bring stretchers, the rapid response and code team members who rush in when a patient deteriorates in the scanner, and the security officers who respond to alarms or help with agitated patients.

At our hospital, the imaging department logged nine MRI near misses in the past year involving non-imaging staff: four oxygen cylinders stopped at the Zone III door, two patients arriving with incomplete screening forms, two staff members entering Zone IV with pagers or badges with metal clips, and one rapid response team that began to wheel a standard crash cart toward the scanner room during a deteriorating patient's scan. None caused harm, but each could have. Annual safety training for these groups currently consists of a slide in the general orientation module.

What this page is doingThe topic is justified with a hazard explanation and the organization's own near-miss data. Mentors look for a training topic tied to a real organizational need, as the project description emphasizes.
3

Target Audience

The primary audience is about 180 staff in four groups: inpatient and emergency nurses who escort patients to MRI, especially on evening and night shifts when imaging staff are fewer; patient transporters; members of the rapid response and code teams; and security officers. They differ in background. Nurses have clinical knowledge of implants and devices but little exposure to the MRI suite. Transporters and security officers have limited clinical training but are often first through the door with equipment. Code team members are trained to act quickly, which in the MRI suite can be the wrong instinct.

As adults with heavy workloads, these learners will engage most with training that addresses situations they recognize, explains the reason behind each rule and lets them practice decisions rather than listen to a lecture. Sessions will be 30 minutes, offered on all shifts, and held in the MRI suite itself so that learners can see the zones and the doors. A secondary audience is unit managers, who will need a short briefing so they can reinforce the training.

Learning Objectives

Each objective below names something a participant should be able to do when the 30 minutes are over, with the evidence that will show it.

ObjectiveHow it will be shown
Explain why the MRI magnet is dangerous even when no scan is runningAnswers a scenario question correctly
Identify the four MRI safety zones and who may enter eachLabels a floor plan of the suite
Name five common objects that must never enter Zone IVSorts pictured items into safe and unsafe
State the screening steps required before a patient or staff member enters Zone IVCompletes a sample screening form with errors to find
Describe what to do when a patient deteriorates in the scannerWalks through the removal-first response in the suite

Discussion Questions

The session will open and close with discussion to draw out what participants already know and what worries them. Opening questions: What metal do you carry on a typical shift without thinking about it? Have you ever been stopped at the MRI door, and what happened? Questions during the session: If a patient on your unit has a device and the paperwork is unclear, who decides whether the MRI can proceed? Why would a code team move the patient out of the scanner room instead of bringing the cart in? Closing questions: On a busy night, what gets in the way of these rules, and what would remove it? What change on your unit would prevent the near misses we discussed?

Preliminary Research

Kanal et al. (2013). The American College of Radiology's guidance on MR safe practices sets out the widely used framework of four safety zones, defines the roles of trained MR personnel and non-MR personnel, and describes screening of patients and staff before entry. It will supply the core rules and terms for the session, including the requirement that non-MR personnel be accompanied in restricted zones and that resuscitation take place outside the magnet room.

Goolsarran et al. (2019). At a large academic medical center, near misses related to MRI screening, especially missed pacemakers and other implants, were common because screening relied on a single step. Using repeated Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles, the team introduced a multistep screening process and reduced near misses from 22 to none in the year after implementation. This study supports treating near misses as learning events and will shape the session's emphasis on screening as a shared, multistep responsibility.

Alkhulaifat et al. (2025). Writing from pediatric radiology, the authors argue that MRI safety depends on culture as much as on rules, including screening, physical barriers, zoning, emergency response and how adverse events are handled. They emphasize a just culture that favors transparency and process improvement over punishment. This source will guide how I discuss near misses with participants: as system signals rather than individual failures, so that staff feel safe reporting them.

What this page is doingEach source is summarized in two or three sentences and tied to how it will be used in the training. Part One asks for references and brief summaries, and mentors check that the summaries show the student has read the sources.
4

Plan for Part Two

Part Two will build a presentation of 12 slides following the objectives above, with speaker notes for each slide that contain what I would say in the session, including the near-miss examples and the scenario questions. The handout will be a single page with the four zones, the list of prohibited objects, the screening steps and the deteriorating-patient response, designed to be posted on units as well as taken home. I will also plan a brief knowledge check before and after the session to measure what participants learned.

References

Alkhulaifat, D., Vidal, L., Larsen, E., Serai, S. D., Sinti-Ycochea, M., Mecca, P., Orfe, L., & Sotardi, S. (2025). MRI safety: Developing the right culture. Pediatric Radiology, 55(5), 895-901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06179-5

Goolsarran, N., Martinez, J., & Garcia, C. (2019). Using near-miss events to improve MRI safety in a large academic centre. BMJ Open Quality, 8(2), Article e000593. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000593

Kanal, E., Barkovich, A. J., Bell, C., Borgstede, J. P., Bradley, W. G., Froelich, J. W., Gimbel, J. R., Gosbee, J. W., Kuhni-Kaminski, E., Larson, P. A., Lester, J. W., Nyenhuis, J., Schaefer, D. J., Sebek, E. A., Weinreb, J., Wilkoff, B. L., Woods, T. O., Lucey, L., & Hernandez, D. (2013). ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 37(3), 501-530. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24011

What the HCM 5020 Module 5 instructions ask for

The HCM-5020 final project puts you in the role of educator in your organization: you select a healthcare topic on which you will train others. Part One, worth 10% of the course grade, asks you to identify your target audience, outline objectives, prepare pertinent questions to lead the discussion and begin research, including references you plan to use with a brief summary of each. Part Two, worth 20%, adds a PowerPoint of at least ten slides with speaker notes and a supporting handout. Part One falls in the Module 5 period, so start choosing a topic early. Pick a subject with a clear need in your workplace and an audience you can describe specifically.

How this HCM 5020 Module 5 example is built

The sample is organized under the headings the project description implies: topic, audience, objectives, discussion questions and research, with a closing plan for Part Two. The topic section explains the hazard simply and then proves the need with the organization's own near-miss log, sorted by type. The audience section describes four groups, how their backgrounds differ and what that means for format, timing and setting. Objectives are measurable and each is paired with how learners will show it, in a table. Discussion questions are grouped by when they will be asked. Each of the three research summaries states what the source found and how the training will use it.

Reading the HCM 5020 Module 5 grading rubric

Mentors grading Part One check whether every element in the project description is present: a defined target audience, objectives, discussion questions, and preliminary research with summaries. Beyond completeness, they look for a topic with a clear organizational need, an audience analysis that affects the design of the training, objectives that are specific and measurable, and questions that would actually generate discussion. Research summaries should show that the sources were read and connected to the training. Because Part Two builds on Part One, a clear plan that leads into the slides and handout strengthens the grade. APA format and scholarly sources apply as in all course papers.

Common HCM 5020 Module 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Part One papers often choose a topic so wide, for example patient safety or customer service, which makes objectives vague. Narrow it to something you could teach in 30 to 60 minutes. Another weak spot is describing the audience only by job title; explain what they already know and what will help them learn. Objectives should start with verbs that can be observed, such as identify, demonstrate or explain, not understand or appreciate. Discussion questions should be open, not yes or no. Research summaries need to say how each source will be used. Our desk can draft Part One of the HCM-5020 final project on a training topic from your own workplace.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More HCM 5020 and Master of Science in Healthcare Management sample papers

HCM 5020 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HCM 5020 Module 5 sample paper?

Part One of the final project appears here in complete form, covering the topic, audience analysis, objectives table, discussion questions, three annotated sources and the plan for Part Two, with margin explanations.

What does Part One of the HCM-5020 final project include?

The syllabus asks you to identify your target audience, outline training objectives, prepare discussion questions and begin research, listing references with brief summaries.

How much is the final project worth?

Together the two parts carry 30% of the HCM-5020 grade, split 10% for Part One and 20% for Part Two.

What makes a good training objective?

A good objective names an observable behavior, such as identifying or demonstrating something, and can be checked during or after the session.

How many sources should Part One include?

Follow your mentor's directions. Several scholarly sources with short summaries show that research has begun and that the sources will support the training.