| Course | DBA-8800 Ethical Leadership and Cultural Competency in the 21st Century |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Module 3 written assignment: biases and decision-making |
| Length | About 554 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DBA 8800 Module 3
Structure Over Good Intentions: Designing Bias Out of a Promotion Panel
Student Name
Doctor of Business Administration, Thomas Edison State University
DBA-8800: Ethical Leadership and Cultural Competency in the 21st Century
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Structure Over Good Intentions: Designing Bias Out of a Promotion Panel
The Decision
Our firm is moving supervisor promotions from manager recommendation to a panel. The change answers one source of bias, the informal network that favored day-shift associates, but panels are also made of people. Before the first panel sits, I want to know where bias could enter and which safeguards have evidence behind them.
Where Bias Enters
Bias can enter at four points. The first is who applies: if openings are discussed in day-shift conversations before they are posted, night associates start behind. The second is how candidates are judged on paper. In a field experiment, Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004) answered job ads in Boston and Chicago with invented resumes and found that the same resume drew roughly half again as many callbacks under a name common among white Americans as under one common among Black Americans. Our candidates' names and accents will be visible to panels.
The third point is the interview. Unstructured conversations let panelists rely on rapport, which favors candidates who resemble them. The fourth is what happens after a decision. Castilla (2008) followed pay decisions inside a large service company and found that workers with identical performance scores got different raises depending on their gender, race and nationality, which he labeled performance-reward bias. A fair rating can still be followed by an unfair outcome.
What Works and What Does Not
The most common response to bias is training to raise awareness of implicit associations. Forscher et al. (2019) combined hundreds of experiments on shifting implicit associations and found the shifts were modest and seldom showed up in what people actually did. Training alone is therefore a weak safeguard for a promotion decision.
Structure is stronger. Levashina et al. (2014) reviewed research on structured employment interviews, in which every candidate is asked the same job-related questions and answers are rated on anchored scales, and found that structure improves the validity of interviews and reduces the influence of irrelevant factors. Accountability matters as well. Castilla (2015) later worked with a large firm to add accountability and transparency to its pay decisions, with managers knowing their awards would be reviewed by a committee, and found that pay gaps by gender, race and nationality narrowed afterward.
Redesigning the Panel
Panelists will receive a one-hour briefing, but its purpose is to teach the structured process, not to change implicit attitudes.
| Point of entry | Safeguard |
|---|---|
| Who applies | Openings posted on both shifts in three languages for ten days before any discussion |
| Judging on paper | Application form with job-related questions only; panel scores it before seeing names |
| Interview | Six structured questions on supervisory tasks, rated on anchored 1 to 5 scales; a shift huddle work sample |
| Panel composition | Three members, at least one from nights, rotating each round |
| Decision | Ratings recorded before discussion; decision follows the scores unless the panel writes down why not |
| After the decision | Promotion and starting pay reviewed by shift and language group each quarter |
Conclusion
Replacing referrals with panels is a necessary step, but it does not remove bias by itself. Evidence points to structure and accountability rather than awareness training. A panel that scores before it discusses, asks every candidate the same questions and reports its results by group gives the promotion process its best chance of being fair.
References
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991-1013. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561
Castilla, E. J. (2008). Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. American Journal of Sociology, 113(6), 1479-1526. https://doi.org/10.1086/588738
Castilla, E. J. (2015). Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organization Science, 26(2), 311-333. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0950
Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 522-559. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000160
Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12052
What the DBA 8800 Module 3 instructions ask for
Module 3 of DBA-8800 studies biases and decision-making, and this page attaches one of the four written assignments to it, as the syllabus leaves each assignment's details to its module. Expect to choose a real decision in an organization, show where bias can affect it, review research on both the bias and the remedies, and redesign the decision process. The seminar's approach is ethical as well as practical, so explain why fairness matters to the people affected as well as to results. Choose remedies for their evidence, not their popularity, and be precise about what each study found and in what setting. Say how you will know whether the redesigned process is fairer, and when you will check.
Inside the DBA 8800 Module 3 example
The paper starts from a decision the firm is about to make: its first promotion panels. It names four points where bias can enter, from who applies to what happens after the decision, and supports each with evidence: a resume field experiment and a study of pay after equal ratings. A section on remedies contrasts a meta-analysis showing that changes in implicit measures do not reliably change behavior with research on structured interviews and accountability. A six-row table matches each point of entry to a safeguard, and the briefing for panelists is limited to teaching the process. The conclusion favors structure over good intentions. The six-row table matches each point where bias can creep in with a safeguard a panel can actually follow.
Reading the DBA 8800 Module 3 grading rubric
The bias paper is judged on a correct grasp of the studies, a decision examined step by step, remedies weighed by their evidence, sound ethics and APA form. Credit goes to papers that locate bias at specific points in a process rather than describing it in general. Reporting what studies found, with their settings and limits, shows research literacy. Distinguishing remedies supported by evidence from popular ones shows critical thinking. A redesigned process with safeguards and monitoring shows that the analysis has practical consequences. Writing about bias in measured, specific language keeps the paper credible. Credit also goes to a plan that reports outcomes by group after the decision, since a fair process can still produce unequal results.
Common DBA 8800 Module 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Weak papers define implicit bias and recommend training, without examining a decision or the evidence on training's effects. Others overstate studies, for example presenting a laboratory finding as proof of workplace behavior. Choose one decision and map its steps. Name where bias can enter at each step, citing field evidence where it exists. Review what remedies have shown and design safeguards for each step, with a way to monitor results. A free first sample on your own DBA-8800 decision can be drafted if you send the process you want to examine. Write out the panel steps in order, so the reader sees where structure replaces judgment and where judgment remains.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DBA 8800 and Doctor of Business Administration sample papers
- DBA 8800 Module 1: Written Assignment: Leading a Change to How Supervisors Are Promoted at a Port Warehouse Firm
- DBA 8800 Module 2: Written Assignment: When a Mixed Workforce Helps and When It Divides
- DBA 8800 Module 4: Written Assignment: What Inclusive Leadership Asks of Warehouse Supervisors
- DBA 8800 Module 5: Final Project: A Change Plan for Psychological Safety on the Night Shift, Presented in Slides
- DBA 8020 Module 6: Final Paper: An Economic Case for Launching a Refill Concentrate Subscription
- OML 8020 Module 2: GLOBE Seminar Paper: Societal Culture and Culturally Endorsed Leadership
- DBA 8000 Module 1: Written Assignment: Decision Rules for a Clinical Laboratory's Core Lab Investment
- DBA 8040 Module 3: Written Assignment: Crafting a Strategy and Ranking Its Objectives
DBA 8800 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DBA 8800 Module 3 sample paper?
The paper above redesigns a port logistics firm's supervisor promotion panel to reduce bias.
Does implicit bias training work?
A meta-analysis by Forscher and colleagues found implicit measures can shift a little, but the changes did not reliably change behavior.
Why do structured interviews reduce bias?
Identical questions tied to the job, scored on fixed anchors, leave less room for liking or first impressions to drive the rating.
What did the resume field experiment find?
Bertrand and Mullainathan found identical resumes with names common among white Americans got about 50 percent more callbacks than those with names common among Black Americans.
What is performance-reward bias?
Castilla's term for unequal rewards, such as raises, given to employees who received the same performance ratings.