AVT 3050 Module 5 Written Assignment: Service Failure and Recovery at Boardwalk Air Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This AVT 3050 Module 5 example is the fifth written assignment for AVT-3050, Airline Marketing and Customer Service, in TESU's B.S.B.A. in Aviation Management. The fifth module, whose title is Putting the Customer First... or Not, asks how airlines meet customer expectations and what happens when they fail. Taking a canceled Saturday flight full of families as its case, the paper draws on research about service encounters and recovery to set service standards and recovery rules for Boardwalk Air, the made-up South Jersey carrier these samples follow. It also explains the federal refund rule that now governs canceled flights and gives front-line staff a recovery matrix they can apply on the spot.

CourseAVT-3050 Airline Marketing and Customer Service
ModuleModule 5
Paper typeWritten Assignment 5: putting the customer first in airline service
LengthAbout 709 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramB.S.B.A. in Aviation Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for AVT 3050 Module 5

1

The Saturday Flight That Did Not Go: Service Failure, Recovery and Putting the Customer First at Boardwalk Air

Student Name

B.S.B.A. in Aviation Management, Thomas Edison State University

AVT-3050: Airline Marketing and Customer Service

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title starts from one concrete failure, the way the paper builds its service policy from a single bad day.
2

The Saturday Flight That Did Not Go: Service Failure, Recovery and Putting the Customer First at Boardwalk Air

A Bad Saturday

In this scenario, Boardwalk Air's Saturday morning flight from Atlantic City to Orlando is canceled when its only spare aircraft is already in use and a mechanical problem grounds the scheduled one. One hundred sixty passengers, most of them families starting a vacation, are at the gate. The next available seats are on Monday. What the airline does in the next two hours will decide whether these customers ever fly it again.

What Customers Remember

Bitner et al. (1990) collected stories from airline, hotel and restaurant customers about service encounters they remembered as especially good or bad. Many of the memorable incidents involved a service failure, and how employees responded mattered as much as the failure itself. Employees who acknowledged the problem, explained it and made an effort to fix it turned some failures into memorable positive encounters. Encounters were remembered as bad when employees ignored the problem, gave no explanation or treated customers rudely. For Boardwalk Air, the lesson is that the cancellation itself is not the end of the story; the response at the gate is.

What Makes Recovery Work

Smith et al. (1999) developed a model of satisfaction after service failure based on fairness. Customers judge recovery by the outcome they receive, such as a refund or compensation, by the procedure, such as how quickly and easily the problem is fixed, and by the interaction, such as whether staff are courteous and give an explanation. Customers want recovery that matches the size of the failure: a small apology does not fix a lost vacation day.

The Federal Floor

In 2024 the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a rule requiring airlines to provide automatic cash refunds when a flight is canceled or significantly changed and the passenger chooses not to travel. A significant delay for a domestic flight is defined as three hours or more. The rule sets a floor that every airline must meet. Putting the customer first means going beyond it: refunds are required, but rebooking, care and communication are where an airline shows it values its customers.

Recovering the Saturday Flight

Applying the research, Boardwalk Air's response would include outcome, procedure and interaction. Outcome: passengers choose between a full refund, issued automatically as the rule requires, and rebooking on the next available Boardwalk Air flight or, where agreements allow, on another airline; families who travel later receive a credit toward a future trip and meal vouchers. Procedure: staff rebook passengers at the gate and by text so families do not wait in a single line, and refunds are processed the same day. Interaction: the station manager explains the cause honestly at the gate, apologizes and stays until the last family is helped.

What this page is doingOrganizing the response by outcome, procedure and interaction applies Smith and colleagues' fairness model directly, which is the analytical step the module looks for.
3

A Recovery Matrix for Front-Line Staff

Giving front-line staff clear authority speeds the procedure, which Smith et al. (1999) found affects satisfaction, and it removes the frustration of waiting while an employee looks for a supervisor.

SituationWhat staff may offer without asking a manager
Delay of 1-3 hoursApology, explanation, updates every 30 minutes, snack voucher
Delay over 3 hoursChoice of refund or rebooking, meal voucher, $50 travel credit
Cancellation, rebooked same dayMeal voucher, $75 travel credit per passenger
Cancellation, next flight a day or more laterRefund or rebooking, hotel if away from home, $150 travel credit per passenger
Lost or delayed bagSame-day delivery when found, essentials allowance

Service Standards

Recovery is the backup; prevention comes first. Boardwalk Air's standards include keeping one spare aircraft available on peak Saturdays, answering phone and chat contacts within ten minutes, posting delays to customers' phones as soon as they are known and training every employee in the recovery matrix. Shaw (2011) stresses that in an airline, staff in contact with customers are part of the product, so standards must be trained, not just written.

Conclusion

Putting the customer first does not mean flights never fail. It means the airline's response to failure is fair in outcome, procedure and interaction. For Boardwalk Air, a clear recovery matrix, prepared staff and honest communication can turn a lost Saturday into a story families tell about an airline that took care of them.

References

Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400105

Shaw, S. (2011). Airline marketing and management (7th ed.). Ashgate.

Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999). A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(3), 356-372. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152082

Reading the AVT 3050 Module 5 assignment instructions

The fifth written assignment in AVT-3050 accompanies Module 5, whose title, Putting the Customer First... or Not, invites a critical look at airline service. It covers the first and fifth course objectives. Expect to analyze what airline customers expect, why service fails and what makes recovery succeed, then apply that analysis to policies and practices. A concrete service failure, real or set in your fictional airline, gives the analysis something to work on. Federal consumer rules on refunds and delays belong in the paper too, since they set the minimum every airline must meet. The service standards you set here become part of your marketing plan. Describe at least one failure in detail, because recovery policies only make sense against a specific case.

How the AVT 3050 Module 5 example is put together

The sample begins with a canceled Saturday flight full of families. Bitner and colleagues' critical incident research shows that the response to failure shapes memories, and Smith, Bolton and Wagner's fairness model splits recovery into outcome, procedure and interaction. A section explains the 2024 federal refund rule as a floor rather than a goal. The paper then applies the model to the Saturday case, with a margin note on that step. A five-row recovery matrix gives front-line staff authority without a manager, and a section on service standards covers prevention. A short conclusion defines putting the customer first as fair recovery. The compensation figures in the matrix are labeled as the airline's proposal so they are not read as industry standards.

Reading the AVT 3050 Module 5 grading rubric

Marks go to accurate use of service research, a clear explanation of why recovery succeeds or fails and practical policies an airline could use. A paper that applies a recognized model to a specific failure, step by step, shows more understanding than a general discussion of good service. Correct description of federal rules, with the date and the main requirement, shows care with facts. Mentors also value realistic standards that a small airline could afford. Plain writing, a table where it clarifies, and APA references covering both the text and outside research are expected in every written assignment for this course. Policies that front-line staff could apply without a manager show an understanding of how recovery works at the gate, not just in a policy manual.

AVT 3050 Module 5 help from the desk

Weak papers praise customer service in general or tell a personal travel complaint without analysis. Others propose generous compensation an airline could never afford, or ignore federal rules entirely. Choose one failure, apply a model of recovery and write policies that front-line staff can use. Check consumer rules on the Department of Transportation's website and describe them accurately. Include prevention as well as recovery. Keep compensation amounts realistic and label them as your proposal. Unsure where to begin on service recovery? Your first AVT-3050 sample from the desk is free. Check that every rule you describe is current, since federal consumer protections for airline passengers changed in 2024.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More AVT 3050 and B.S.B.A. in Aviation Management sample papers

AVT 3050 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free AVT 3050 Module 5 sample paper?

The paper above plans service recovery for a canceled family flight at a fictional Atlantic City airline.

What makes service recovery successful?

Research by Smith, Bolton and Wagner shows customers judge recovery by the outcome, the procedure and the way staff treat them.

What does the 2024 DOT refund rule require?

Automatic cash refunds when a flight is canceled or significantly changed and the passenger chooses not to travel; for domestic flights a significant delay means three hours or more.

Why should front-line airline staff be able to offer compensation?

Giving staff clear authority speeds recovery and removes the wait for a supervisor, both of which affect how fair customers find the response.

How many written assignments are in AVT-3050?

Seven, worth 37 percent of the grade together.