OML 6100 Module 3 Written Assignment: Culture and Strategic Leadership in a Claims-Focused Company Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This OML 6100 Module 3 sample answers a written assignment on organizational leadership in Organizational Management and Leadership I, from TESU's Master of Science in Management in Organizational Leadership. OML-6100 asks in this module how leaders shape whole organizations: strategic direction, culture and values, and the link between culture and performance. The paper analyzes the composite Mount Laurel insurance company where the writer leads a support team. Using three levels of culture, it shows that the company's espoused value of service to agents conflicts with a deeper assumption that support is a cost to be minimized, and it draws on research on culture and on top leaders to recommend how executives could align the culture with their new growth strategy.

CourseOML-6100 Organizational Management and Leadership I
ModuleModule 3
Paper typeModule 3 written assignment: organizational leadership
LengthAbout 606 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramM.S. in Management in Organizational Leadership
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for OML 6100 Module 3

1

Service in the Mission, Cost in the Budget: Culture and Strategic Leadership at an Insurer

Student Name

M.S. in Management in Organizational Leadership, Thomas Edison State University

OML-6100: Organizational Management and Leadership I

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the gap between the espoused value and the underlying assumption that the paper's cultural analysis uncovers.
2

Service in the Mission, Cost in the Budget: Culture and Strategic Leadership at an Insurer

The Organization and Its Strategy

The company sells commercial insurance through 1,400 independent agents. Last year the executive team announced a strategy to grow small business policies by 25 percent in three years, chiefly by making the company the easiest carrier for agents to work with. Lussier and Achua (2022) describe strategic leadership as a leader's ability to anticipate, envision and maintain flexibility, and to empower others to create a viable future. The strategy is clear. Whether the culture will support it is less so.

Three Levels of Culture

Schein and Schein (2017) describe culture in three layers: artifacts, what can be seen and heard; espoused values, what people say they believe; and underlying assumptions, the unspoken beliefs that actually steer behavior.

The artifacts tell two stories. The posters match the espoused value, but the budgets and the basement match a different assumption. When an agent's problem requires a policy exception, analysts must route it through underwriting, which takes days; executives describe this as protecting margins.

LevelWhat I observe
Artifacts"Agents First" posters; a support center in the basement; support budgets cut in each of the last three years
Espoused valuesThe mission statement promises "service that makes agents' work easier"
Underlying assumptionsSupport is a cost center; the best support is the least support; underwriting and sales create value
What this page is doingPlacing the conflicting artifacts side by side shows that the real assumption, not the mission statement, governs how the company treats agents.
3

Subcultures

The support center also has its own subculture, which complicates the picture. Schein and Schein note that large organizations contain occupational subcultures with their own assumptions. Support analysts assume the agent is a partner whose problem is theirs to solve; underwriters assume the agent is a source of risk to be screened. When analysts route exceptions to underwriting, the two subcultures meet, and agents feel the friction as delay. A growth strategy built on ease for agents will have to bridge these subcultures, not only change the culture at the top.

Culture and Performance

Denison and Mishra (1995) linked four cultural traits, involvement, consistency, adaptability and mission, to organizational effectiveness, with involvement and adaptability tied to growth. Our culture is strong on consistency, rules followed reliably, but weak on involvement and adaptability: support analysts have no voice in how processes are designed, and exceptions are resisted. The growth strategy depends exactly on the traits the culture lacks.

The Role of Top Leaders

Hambrick and Mason (1984) proposed that organizations reflect their top managers, whose backgrounds and values shape strategic choices. Our executive team is drawn almost entirely from underwriting and finance; no executive has led a service operation. That may explain why support is seen as cost. Schein and Schein argue that leaders build culture mainly through what they notice, measure and control, where they put resources and how they respond in a crisis.

Recommendations

To align culture with strategy, executives should change what they attend to, measure and fund. First, report agent effort, the time agents spend getting answers, at every executive meeting, alongside premiums. Second, give support a seat in process design, such as a standing role on the underwriting exceptions committee. Third, fund support for the growth strategy rather than cutting it, and say why. Changing posters will not change assumptions; changing what leaders measure and reward will, over time. None of these steps is expensive. The support budget cuts of the last three years total about $600,000, a small sum beside the premium growth the strategy targets.

Conclusion

The company's culture professes service but assumes support is a cost. The growth strategy will succeed only if top leaders change the signals that create that assumption.

References

Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204-223. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.204

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628

Lussier, R. N., & Achua, C. F. (2022). Leadership: Theory, application, and skill development (7th ed.). Sage.

Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.

Reading the OML 6100 Module 3 assignment instructions

This written assignment covers organizational leadership. Expect to analyze an organization you know, its strategy, culture and leadership, using the textbook's treatment of strategic leadership and culture together with research. Show evidence for each claim about culture, such as specific artifacts and behaviors, and explain how culture affects the organization's ability to carry out its strategy. End with recommendations for what leaders should do. Keep your analysis at the organizational level rather than describing your own team. Look for subcultures as well, since departments or occupations often hold assumptions different from the company's. Consider what your recommendations would cost and who would need to approve them. Ground every claim about culture in something you have observed directly.

How the OML 6100 Module 3 example is put together

The paper opens with the organization's strategy and the textbook's definition of strategic leadership. A table analyzes culture at three levels and the text shows how artifacts reveal a conflict between espoused values and assumptions. A section applies research on culture traits and effectiveness to the strategy. A section uses research on top managers and how leaders embed culture. Three recommendations and a conclusion follow. A section on subcultures shows how support analysts and underwriters hold opposite assumptions about agents, and how agents feel the friction as delay. The recommendations note how little they would cost compared with the growth the strategy targets. The conclusion names the single change that matters most.

Reading the OML 6100 Module 3 grading rubric

Expect marks for accurate use of culture and strategic leadership concepts, evidence for claims, analysis of the link between culture and strategy, practical recommendations and clear writing. Papers that uncover a gap between espoused values and underlying assumptions show depth. Using research on culture and on top leaders strengthens the analysis. Recommendations that change what leaders measure and fund, rather than what they say, demonstrate understanding of how culture is embedded. Recognizing subcultures, and showing where they meet in the work, adds depth to a culture analysis. Recommendations with a sense of cost and feasibility show managerial judgment, and clear evidence at each level of culture makes every claim checkable.

Common OML 6100 Module 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Students lose points by describing culture with slogans, by confusing espoused values with assumptions or by recommending communication campaigns to change culture. Others stay at the team level. Gather evidence at each level of culture. Ask what behavior actually reveals. Link culture to strategy. Recommend changes in what leaders attend to, measure and reward. Look for subcultures where departments meet, and estimate what your recommendations would cost so leaders can weigh them. Use what people do, not what posters say, as your main evidence for assumptions, and quote a real artifact for each level. A free first sample on your own OML-6100 organizational leadership assignment is available on request.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More OML 6100 and M.S. in Management in Organizational Leadership sample papers

OML 6100 Module 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free OML 6100 Module 3 sample paper?

A three-level culture analysis of an insurance company and its strategy is the assignment above.

What are Schein's three levels of culture?

Visible artifacts, the values an organization espouses, and the underlying assumptions people take for granted.

How does culture relate to performance?

Research links traits such as involvement, consistency, adaptability and mission to organizational effectiveness.

How do leaders embed culture?

Mostly through what they notice and reward, where resources go and how they behave when a crisis hits.

What is strategic leadership?

A leader's ability to anticipate, envision and maintain flexibility, and to empower others to create a viable future.