| Course | NUR-8100 Health, Healthcare Policy, and Politics |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 |
| Paper type | Policy process analysis |
| Length | About 1,087 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 8100 Module 1
Introduced Again: Reading New Jersey's Safe Staffing Bill Through the Problem, Policy and Politics Streams
Student Name
Doctor of Nursing Practice, Thomas Edison State University
NUR-8100: Health, Healthcare Policy, and Politics
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Introduced Again: Reading New Jersey's Safe Staffing Bill Through the Problem, Policy and Politics Streams
Introduction
Health policy is often taught as a sequence: a problem is identified, a solution is drafted, a bill is passed and the law is implemented. Real policies rarely move that neatly. Some ideas sit for years and then pass quickly; others are introduced every session and never reach a vote. Trenton's long-running fight over hospital nurse ratios belongs firmly in that second group. Bills setting ratios by unit type have been introduced repeatedly in the Legislature, with strong support from nurses' unions and strong opposition from hospitals, and none had become law when this paper was written. This paper uses a policy process framework to explain why, and what might change the outcome.
The Multiple Streams Framework
John Kingdon built the multiple streams model to explain how issues rise onto the federal agenda; it pictures three currents, problems, policies and politics, moving through government mostly independently of one another. In the first stream sit conditions that people start calling problems, usually because a number moves, a scandal breaks or an existing program reports back badly. The second holds the ideas that specialists and interest groups keep drafting, and an idea lasts there only if it looks workable and tolerable to those who must vote on it. The third carries the national or state mood, lobbying pressure and turnover among officeholders. Change tends to happen when all three line up at once, during a window that an election or an emergency can open, and when some determined advocate, the policy entrepreneur, joins them. Béland and Howlett (2016) note that the framework has been widely used beyond its original setting and that its value lies in explaining timing: why an idea's moment comes when it does.
The Problem Stream
For a problem to reach the agenda, it must be visible and defined in a way that calls for government action. Nurse staffing has strong indicators. Aiken et al. (2010) surveyed more than 22,000 hospital nurses in California, Pennsylvania and New Jersey in 2006 and found that California nurses, working under a state-mandated ratio, cared for one fewer patient on average than nurses in the other two states and two fewer on medical and surgical units. Fewer patients per nurse went with fewer deaths, and nurses anywhere in the three states whose loads happened to match California's limits reported less exhaustion and more satisfaction with their jobs. The study placed New Jersey hospitals directly in the evidence, which gives local advocates a ready indicator. Focusing events, such as nurse strikes over staffing or reports of patient harm, add urgency for a time and then fade.
The problem is also contested. Hospitals define it differently: as a workforce shortage that a mandate would worsen, not as a choice to staff lean. Competing definitions are typical of the problem stream and help explain why the issue has not coupled with the other streams.
The Policy Stream
In the policy stream, the ratio proposal has a clear model. California implemented minimum ratios by unit type in 2004, and the experience there provides evidence of feasibility. More recently, McHugh et al. (2021) evaluated ratio legislation in Queensland, Australia, and found that mortality fell in hospitals subject to the ratios compared with similar hospitals that were not, giving advocates a second, prospective evaluation. Alternatives also circulate: staffing committees with nurse members that set unit plans, public reporting of staffing levels and acuity-based systems. These alternatives are often promoted by hospital associations as more flexible, and some states have adopted them instead of ratios. A policy entrepreneur in New Jersey must therefore show not only that ratios work but that they work better than the alternatives.
| Stream | New Jersey condition | Effect on the bill |
|---|---|---|
| Problem | Strong workload data, contested definition | Visible but disputed |
| Policy | California and Queensland models; committee alternatives | Feasible, with competing options |
| Politics | Unions for, hospital association against; cost concerns | Divided, no window yet |
The Politics Stream
The politics stream is where the bill has stalled. Nurses' unions in New Jersey have made ratios a priority and can mobilize members, but the state's hospital association argues that mandates would force hospitals to close beds or units when nurses cannot be hired and would raise costs, particularly for safety-net hospitals. Legislators hear both arguments in districts where hospitals are major employers. Public mood generally favors more nurses but rarely focuses on staffing for long. Governors' positions and the composition of the health committees in each chamber matter, and changes after elections can open or close a window.
Timing inside the legislative calendar matters as well. New Jersey's sessions run for two years, and a bill that does not pass both houses and receive the governor's signature before the session ends must be introduced again from the start. Each reintroduction resets committee hearings and amendments, so momentum built late in one session is easily lost, and advocates must rebuild support with a partly new set of legislators.
What Could Open a Window
A window could open through a focusing event, such as a widely reported patient death linked to understaffing, through a change in committee leadership, or through a compromise that reduces opposition. Phased implementation, exemptions for hospitals in shortage areas, state funding for safety-net hospitals and enforcement through reporting rather than penalties at first have all been used to make mandates more acceptable elsewhere. A policy entrepreneur who can offer such a compromise while keeping the core ratios intact is the person who couples the streams.
The DNP Nurse's Role
Each stream offers a doctorally prepared nurse something to do. In the problem stream, she can produce local data, such as unit-level staffing and outcomes in her own hospital system, which carry weight with legislators who represent that district. In the policy stream, she can help draft workable details, such as how ratios would apply to step-down units, and analyze the costs. In the politics stream, she can testify, meet legislators and build coalitions between unions, professional associations and patient groups. Understanding the streams helps her choose which action fits the moment.
Conclusion
New Jersey's safe staffing bill has a strong problem stream and a well-developed policy stream, but the politics stream remains divided, so the streams have not coupled. The multiple streams framework explains why a well-supported idea can wait for years and points to what could change that: a focusing event, a political shift or a compromise that a policy entrepreneur brings forward at the right moment.
References
Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Cimiotti, J. P., Clarke, S. P., Flynn, L., Seago, J. A., Spetz, J., & Smith, H. L. (2010). Implications of the California nurse staffing mandate for other states. Health Services Research, 45(4), 904-921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01114.x
Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410
McHugh, M. D., Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Windsor, C., Douglas, C., & Yates, P. (2021). Effects of nurse-to-patient ratio legislation on nurse staffing and patient mortality, readmissions, and length of stay: A prospective study in a panel of hospitals. The Lancet, 397(10288), 1905-1913. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00768-6
NUR 8100 Module 1 instructions, in plain terms
Developing and implementing health policy in institutions and government is the first skill in the NUR-8100 catalog description, and because TESU posts no syllabus for this course, the first module here is set on the policy process itself. Expect a paper that chooses a policy, applies a recognized framework such as multiple streams, the stages model or advocacy coalitions, identifies the stakeholders and explains why the policy has or has not advanced. Some classrooms ask you to track a bill currently before your state legislature. Check the directions for the framework and length. Give the model a page at most and let the bill, its history and its players fill the rest. Check the bill's current status in the Legislature's own records before you write, since sessions end and numbers change.
Inside the NUR 8100 Module 1 example
The paper opens by contrasting the tidy textbook sequence with a bill that returns every session. The multiple streams framework is described with its three streams, the policy window and the policy entrepreneur. The problem stream section uses a three-state nurse survey that included New Jersey and notes the hospitals' competing definition. The policy stream section presents California and Queensland as models and names the alternatives. A three-row table shows the state of each stream. The politics stream section explains the divided interests, and later sections describe what could open a window and what a DNP nurse can do in each stream, before a conclusion.
Reading the NUR 8100 Module 1 grading rubric
A policy process paper is read for a named model applied to one real bill, an honest history of that bill, every major interest group given its say and an explanation of why it has advanced or stuck. Mentors look for evidence used in the problem and policy streams, not just assertion. Recognizing competing problem definitions and alternative proposals shows depth. A discussion of the nurse's role should be concrete. Sources should include peer-reviewed research and, where needed, primary documents such as bill texts. APA formatting completes the grade, and a summary table of the framework's components often helps. Mentors also reward a clear account of the legislative calendar, since timing shapes what is possible.
Common NUR 8100 Module 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Many drafts spend four pages on Kingdon and one paragraph on the bill. Reverse the balance. Students also describe only the side they agree with; name the opposing stakeholders and their arguments fairly. Avoid stating that a bill will pass or fail without explaining what would change the outcome. Evidence in the problem stream should be specific and preferably local. Do not cite advocacy group fact sheets as research. Make the nurse's role practical, with actions tied to each stream. Check that every claim about a bill's status is current. If your classroom assigns a different policy, use the same structure. The desk will write a draft on the NUR-8100 policy you are assigned, with the first one free.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 8100 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- NUR 8100 Module 2: Access Policy Paper: What Medicaid Expansion Changed
- NUR 8100 Module 3: Quality and Payment Paper: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
- NUR 8100 Module 4: Social Justice Policy Paper: Twelve Months of Postpartum Medicaid
- NUR 8100 Module 5: Workforce Policy Brief: Full Practice Authority for New Jersey Nurse Practitioners
- NUR 8100 Module 6: Advocacy Paper: Written Testimony on Hospital Nurse Staffing Ratios
- NUR 8250 Module 2: Business Plan Paper: An APN Transitional Care Service, Its Trials and a Five-Year Pro Forma
- NUR 8320 Module 6: Policy Leadership Paper: Safe Staffing Legislation, NP Practice Authority and the Nurse Executive's Voice
- NUR 8200 Module 4: Social Needs Paper: Community Health Workers, Navigation Trials and Return on Investment
- NUR 8050 Module 2: Quantitative Appraisal: A Quasi-Experimental Oral Care Study
NUR 8100 Module 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 8100 Module 1 sample paper?
The whole analysis is on this page. It reads New Jersey's nurse staffing ratio bill through the problem, policy and politics streams.
What is the multiple streams framework?
A model of agenda setting in which problem, policy and politics streams flow separately and policy change becomes likely when they couple during a policy window, often pushed by a policy entrepreneur.
Does New Jersey have nurse staffing ratios?
Not as of this paper. Bills setting minimum hospital ratios have been introduced repeatedly without becoming law. California was the first state to set ratios for every hospital unit, and Oregon passed its own ratio law in 2023.
What did the California staffing mandate study find?
The 2006 survey placed New Jersey medical-surgical nurses about two patients heavier than their California peers, and lighter loads in any state tracked with fewer deaths and less burnout.
Who opposes nurse staffing ratios?
Hospital associations generally argue that mandates raise costs and could force bed closures during shortages, and they often prefer staffing committees or reporting.