NUR 7642 Module 4 Treatment-Resistant Depression Case: VAST-D Augmentation, Esketamine and TMS Example

Reviewed by Gwyneth Ollerton, MSN, RN Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

Treatment-resistant depression in a 47-year-old high school chemistry teacher in Montclair who has not recovered after two full antidepressant trials is examined in this NUR 7642 Module 4 sample paper, which follows her from her first prescription to a stepped plan. Prepared for TESU's adult PMHNP course, Part B, the MSN case first checks that both trials were adequate, then chooses aripiprazole augmentation from the VAST-D trial of 1,522 veterans, where it brought remission to 28.9 percent against 22.3 percent for switching, and lays out esketamine nasal spray and transcranial magnetic stimulation as next steps from their own trials. Psychotherapy and measurement continue throughout this NUR-7642 case.

CourseNUR-7642 Advanced Assessment, Differential Diagnosis, and Management of Psychiatric Disorders Adult Population, Part B
ModuleModule 4
Paper typeCase analysis: treatment-resistant depression
LengthAbout 1,013 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramM.S. in Nursing, Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 7642 Module 4

1

Two Antidepressants Later: Confirming Treatment Resistance and Choosing the Next Step for a 47-Year-Old Chemistry Teacher

Student Name

M.S. in Nursing, Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, Thomas Edison State University

NUR-7642: Advanced Assessment, Differential Diagnosis, and Management of Psychiatric Disorders: Adult Population, Part B

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title counts the trials already given, because treatment resistance is defined by adequate past trials and the paper must show they were adequate.
2

Two Antidepressants Later: Confirming Treatment Resistance and Choosing the Next Step for a 47-Year-Old Chemistry Teacher

Still Not Herself

Elena, an invented patient, is 47 and has taught chemistry at a public high school in Montclair for twenty years. Her current depression began fourteen months ago, after her mother's death and a hard divorce in the same year. She has low mood most days, no pleasure in the garden she loved, poor sleep, low energy and trouble grading papers. Some nights she has thought her teenagers might manage better without her, but no plan and no past attempts.

Her primary care clinician started sertraline, raised it to 150 mg and kept it there for ten weeks with partial benefit. She was then switched to venlafaxine, raised to 225 mg and held for twelve weeks. Her PHQ-9 went from 21 to 15. She has been in weekly therapy for six months. Her thyroid tests, vitamin B12 and blood count are normal. She drinks a glass of wine a few nights a week. Her sister has bipolar disorder.

She has kept working, which she says has saved her, but she now spends her evenings in bed and her weekends asleep. Her two teenagers have noticed and have started cooking dinner. Her principal has asked if she is all right. She is frightened that she will never feel like herself again and asks whether something is wrong with her brain that medicine cannot reach. The paper takes that fear seriously and answers it with what the evidence offers next.

Is It Truly Treatment Resistant?

Before calling depression treatment resistant, the paper checks four things. First, adequacy: both drugs reached usual therapeutic doses for at least eight weeks, and her pharmacy records show she filled them on time. Second, diagnosis: her sister's bipolar disorder raises the question of a bipolar depression, but Elena has never had a hypomanic period, confirmed by her best friend of thirty years. Third, contributors: alcohol is modest, and her thyroid is normal. Fourth, therapy: she is in an evidence-based therapy. With two adequate failed trials in this episode, she meets the common definition.

What this page is doingThe paper confirms adequacy with pharmacy records, not assumption. Mentors credit a careful check before the label is applied.
3

Switch or Augment?

Mohamed et al. (2017) randomly assigned 1,522 veterans with major depression that had not responded to at least one adequate antidepressant trial at 35 medical centers to switch to bupropion, add bupropion or add aripiprazole for 12 weeks. Remission occurred in 22.3 percent of the switch group, 26.9 percent of the bupropion augmentation group and 28.9 percent of the aripiprazole augmentation group. Only the aripiprazole augmentation exceeded switching for remission, and its response rate was also higher than either bupropion option. Aripiprazole brought more weight gain, restlessness and sleepiness, while bupropion brought more anxiety.

For Elena, venlafaxine has given partial benefit, so augmentation keeps that gain. Aripiprazole is added at 2 mg and raised to 5 mg after two weeks. Restlessness is explained so she can report it early, and her weight, glucose and lipids are checked at baseline and twelve weeks. Her mood is tracked with the PHQ-9 every two weeks.

Augmentation also has a cost the paper names. Aripiprazole is an antipsychotic, and although the dose used for depression is low, it can cause restlessness, weight gain and, rarely, movement problems over time. Elena is told this plainly, and a movement scale is recorded at baseline. She asks whether taking an antipsychotic means she is psychotic, and the paper records the answer: the drug is used here for its effect on mood at a dose far below the doses used for psychosis.

If Augmentation Fails

Popova et al. (2019) tested esketamine nasal spray, given twice weekly in a clinic with a newly started oral antidepressant, against the new antidepressant with a placebo spray in 227 adults with depression that had not responded to at least two antidepressants. At 28 days, depression scores had fallen four points more on the Montgomery-Asberg scale with esketamine, with improvement seen earlier as well. Dissociation, nausea, vertigo, altered taste and dizziness were more common with esketamine. Because of dissociation and sedation, each dose is given under observation for two hours, and patients cannot drive that day.

O'Reardon et al. (2007) randomly assigned 301 medication-free patients with major depression that had not responded to past treatment to active or sham transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, five days a week for four to six weeks. Active stimulation was superior on several depression scales at weeks 4 and 6, remission rates were roughly twice as high at week 6, and only 4.5 percent dropped out for side effects, mostly scalp discomfort.

Elena, who teaches all day, prefers to try aripiprazole first. If she has not responded by eight weeks, TMS could be arranged with early morning sessions before school, and esketamine would need afternoons off twice a week for the first month.

OptionEvidencePractical issues for Elena
Aripiprazole augmentationBest remission in VAST-DChosen; watch restlessness and weight
Bupropion augmentationNo better than switch for remissionAlternative if aripiprazole not tolerated
EsketamineFaster, larger drop than placebo sprayTwice-weekly clinic visits; no driving after
TMSRemission about doubled versus shamDaily sessions for six weeks
Electroconvulsive therapyHighest response in severe casesReserved for severe or urgent illness
What this page is doingThe table weighs evidence with the patient's schedule. Graders credit choices that fit how the patient lives.
4

Therapy and Safety

Her therapy shifts to behavioral activation, rebuilding the garden one bed at a time, and to grief work for her mother. Her passive thoughts of death are checked at each visit, and a safety plan names her sister, her pastor and the crisis line. Because her sister has bipolar disorder, Elena is told the signs of hypomania to watch for on any new treatment.

Conclusion

Elena has treatment-resistant depression, confirmed by two adequate trials, a careful look for bipolar disorder and normal laboratory tests. Aripiprazole augmentation, chosen from the VAST-D trial, keeps her partial gain from venlafaxine and offers the best remission rate among the options studied. Esketamine and TMS are ready as next steps, chosen by evidence and by what her teaching schedule allows. Behavioral activation, grief work, safety planning and PHQ-9 tracking continue throughout.

References

Mohamed, S., Johnson, G. R., Chen, P., Hicks, P. B., Davis, L. L., Yoon, J., Gleason, T. C., Vertrees, J. E., Weingart, K., Tal, I., Scrymgeour, A., Lawrence, D. D., Planeta, B., Thase, M. E., Huang, G. D., & Zisook, S. (2017). Effect of antidepressant switching vs augmentation on remission among patients with major depressive disorder unresponsive to antidepressant treatment: The VAST-D randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 318(2), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.8036

O'Reardon, J. P., Solvason, H. B., Janicak, P. G., Sampson, S., Isenberg, K. E., Nahas, Z., McDonald, W. M., Avery, D., Fitzgerald, P. B., Loo, C., Demitrack, M. A., George, M. S., & Sackeim, H. A. (2007). Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: A multisite randomized controlled trial. Biological Psychiatry, 62(11), 1208-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018

Popova, V., Daly, E. J., Trivedi, M., Cooper, K., Lane, R., Lim, P., Mazzucco, C., Hough, D., Thase, M. E., Shelton, R. C., Molero, P., Vieta, E., Bajbouj, M., Manji, H., Drevets, W. C., & Singh, J. B. (2019). Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray combined with a newly initiated oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression: A randomized double-blind active-controlled study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 176(6), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19020172

NUR 7642 Module 4 instructions, in plain terms

Depression that does not respond to treatment is a frequent adult concern within the NUR-7642 catalog description, and since no syllabus is published, module four addresses depression that two antidepressants have not lifted. Expect an analysis that checks whether past trials were adequate in dose, length and adherence, rules out bipolar depression, substances and medical contributors, chooses between switching and augmenting from trial evidence, writes the monitoring that goes with the choice and lays out next steps such as esketamine, transcranial magnetic stimulation or electroconvulsive therapy with their practical demands. Some sections assign psychotic depression or a patient who wants ketamine outside a clinic. Check whether your directions name a definition of treatment resistance, ask for a stepped plan or require cost and access to be discussed.

Inside the NUR 7642 Module 4 example

Elena's fourteen months of depression after her mother's death and divorce open the paper, with her two antidepressant trials and partial response. The paper checks adequacy with pharmacy records, rules out bipolar depression through a friend's account and reviews laboratory tests. VAST-D is reported with its remission figures and side effects, and aripiprazole is added with a dose plan and metabolic checks. The esketamine and transcranial magnetic stimulation trials are reported with their results and practical demands, and each option is then weighed against a teacher's working day. Garden-bed activation, grief sessions for her mother and a safety plan round out the care. Margin notes explain the adequacy check and why the patient's schedule shaped the order of next steps.

NUR 7642 Module 4 rubric: what earns full marks

Treatment-resistant depression cases are graded on confirming that past trials were adequate, ruling out bipolar depression and contributors, choosing between switching and augmenting with trial evidence, monitoring the chosen drug, and setting out further options with their evidence and practical demands. Mentors credit the use of pharmacy records or other evidence of adherence. Explaining the observation period and driving restriction after esketamine is often noted as safe practice. Fitting the order of next steps to the patient's work and life shows patient-centered planning. Continuing therapy and safety assessment throughout shows a complete plan. Figures should match their trials. APA style is expected, and the paper reads best when each next step has a clear trigger, such as no response at eight weeks.

NUR 7642 Module 4 help from the desk

The most common slip is calling depression treatment resistant without checking dose, duration and adherence of past trials. Another is skipping the bipolar question, especially with a family history. Students often list esketamine or TMS without their practical demands; include observation time, driving rules and session schedules. Write the metabolic checks for an antipsychotic used as augmentation. Keep therapy and safety planning in the plan. Set a time point for deciding the next step. Your own stepped-care depression paper can start from the rubric you were given; the first custom draft costs nothing.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More NUR 7642 and M.S. in Nursing, Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner sample papers

NUR 7642 Module 4 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 7642 Module 4 sample paper?

Elena's treatment-resistant depression case, from two failed antidepressants to aripiprazole augmentation and a stepped plan, is printed in full above.

What is treatment-resistant depression?

Commonly, depression that has not responded to at least two adequate antidepressant trials in dose and length during the current episode.

Is augmentation better than switching antidepressants?

In VAST-D, adding aripiprazole gave 28.9 percent remission compared with 22.3 percent for switching to bupropion, with more weight gain and restlessness.

How does esketamine work for depression?

Given as a nasal spray twice weekly in a clinic with an oral antidepressant, it lowered depression scores more than placebo spray at 28 days.

Does TMS work for depression?

In a trial of 301 patients, active stimulation roughly doubled remission compared with sham at six weeks with few dropouts.