NUR 7020 Module 6 Professionalism Paper: Just Culture After a Barcode Workaround and a Medication Error Example

Reviewed by Gwyneth Ollerton, MSN, RN Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

Professional accountability and just culture are examined in this NUR 7020 Module 6 sample paper, in which a nurse manager at an invented Bayonne hospital reviews a medication error made when a nurse bypassed barcode scanning on a night the wristband printer failed. Developed for the executive managerial process course in TESU's MSN Nursing Administration specialty, the paper applies Marx's three-way sorting of slips, risky shortcuts and recklessness, Reason's description of a safety culture that is informed, reporting, just, flexible and learning, and a review linking fair and just culture with teamwork and leadership engagement in high reliability. The manager's decision to coach rather than discipline, with system fixes and measures, closes this NUR-7020 paper.

CourseNUR-7020 Nursing Administration Executive Managerial Process
ModuleModule 6
Paper typeAdministration paper: professionalism, accountability and just culture
LengthAbout 1,116 words, 7 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramM.S. in Nursing, Nursing Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 7020 Module 6

1

Console, Coach or Sanction? A Just Culture Review of a Barcode Workaround in Bayonne

Student Name

M.S. in Nursing, Nursing Administration, Thomas Edison State University

NUR-7020: Nursing Administration: Executive Managerial Process

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title lists the three responses Marx's framework allows, because the manager's decision depends on placing the behavior in the right category.
2

Console, Coach or Sanction? A Just Culture Review of a Barcode Workaround in Bayonne

The Event

The hospital, the nurse and the patient in this paper are invented. On a 30-bed medical unit at a hospital in Bayonne, the wristband printer failed at 2100 on a busy night. Patients admitted that evening had handwritten bands that the barcode scanner could not read. A nurse with six years of experience, caring for five patients, gave the 2200 medications for two roommates. Unable to scan either band, she used the override function, which the unit's nurses had been using for weeks whenever a scan failed, and gave metoprolol intended for one patient to his roommate, who was already on a calcium channel blocker. His heart rate fell to 42 and his blood pressure dropped. He was treated, monitored overnight and recovered fully. The nurse reported the error herself within minutes.

Several staff members expected her to be suspended. The unit's manager, who is finishing an MSN in nursing administration, decided first to review the event using a just culture framework.

Three Kinds of Behavior

Marx (2001) argued that a just culture is neither blame-free nor punitive. People answer for the choices they make, and leaders answer for the systems that shape those choices. He distinguished three behaviors. Human error is an inadvertent slip or mistake, such as picking up the wrong vial; the manager comforts the person and repairs whatever let the slip through. At-risk behavior is a choice that raises risk without the person seeing it, or while believing the risk is worth taking, often because the shortcut has become normal; the right response is to coach the person, remove the incentives for the shortcut and make the safe choice easier. Reckless behavior means knowingly ignoring a large risk that nothing justifies, and only this category warrants sanction.

The nurse's choice to override the scanner was not inadvertent, so it was not simple human error. It was not reckless either. She did not consciously disregard a risk she saw as unjustified. Overriding had become the unit's normal response to scan failures, and nobody had ever been told that it was unsafe when two patients' bands were unreadable. It fits Marx's description of at-risk behavior, with a human error, giving the wrong patient's medicine, at the end of it.

BehaviorDefinitionResponseThis event
Human errorInadvertent slip or mistakeConsole; fix the systemWrong patient's dose selected
At-risk behaviorRisky choice, risk not recognized or thought justifiedCoach; remove incentives for the shortcutOverride used as a routine workaround
Reckless behaviorConscious disregard of substantial, unjustifiable riskSanctionNot present
What this page is doingThe table places each part of the event in its category. Mentors credit a paper that separates the choice from the slip.
3

Reason's Safety Culture

Reason (1997) described a safety culture as having several connected parts. An informed culture knows where the risks lie, which depends on a reporting culture in which people report errors and near misses. A reporting culture depends on a just culture, in which people trust that they will be treated fairly and know where the line between acceptable and unacceptable behavior is drawn. A flexible culture lets decisions move to the people with expertise when conditions change, and a learning culture draws conclusions from what is reported and changes.

The nurse reported her own error at once. Disciplining her for an error the system made likely would tell every nurse on the unit that reporting is dangerous, and the next error might go unreported. A reporting culture is only as strong as the way the last report was handled.

Just Culture and High Reliability

Frankel et al. (2006) described a fair and just culture, effective teamwork and engaged leadership as the tools that let health care organizations move toward high reliability. They argued that leaders must apply a consistent method for judging individual accountability, separating system problems from individual choices, and that leaders' visible engagement, such as walking rounds in which they ask staff about safety concerns and report back on what was done, builds the trust needed for reporting. A just culture without leadership follow-through, they warned, becomes a slogan.

The Manager's Response

The manager met privately with the nurse, thanked her for reporting immediately and explained the review. Together they talked through the choice to override, what she knew about the risk and what would make the safe choice easier. The nurse agreed to coaching on two points: never overriding for two patients in the same room at once, and calling the charge nurse whenever a band cannot be scanned. Her record notes coaching, not discipline. The manager also sat down with the patient and his wife, told them what had gone wrong and apologized, in line with the hospital's disclosure policy.

What this page is doingThe response matches the category and includes disclosure to the patient. Graders look for fairness to the nurse and honesty with the patient.
4

Fixing the System

The review found that overrides on the unit had risen to 11 percent of medication administrations in the past month, compared with less than 2 percent before the printer problems began. The manager asked pharmacy and informatics to add a hard stop requiring a second nurse's verification for any override, worked with engineering to install a backup printer on the unit and asked the charge nurse to check scanning problems at the start of each shift. She also shared the event, without names, at the unit's staff meeting, explaining the just culture review and the system fixes, so that everyone saw how reports are handled.

Leadership Follow-Through

The manager added the event to her monthly safety rounds, asking nurses on each shift whether the backup printer and the new hard stop were working and whether anything else was pushing them toward overrides. On the second round, a night nurse pointed out that scanners on two medication carts had weak batteries and often failed late in the shift, another source of overrides. The batteries were replaced. Reporting what was done after each concern, as Frankel and colleagues advised, showed staff that reports lead to changes.

Measures

The unit will track override rates weekly, near misses and errors reported, wristband printer downtime and staff answers to the safety culture survey question on whether mistakes are held against them.

Limits

Categorizing behavior requires judgment, and different managers might place the same choice differently, which is why the hospital uses a written algorithm and a second reviewer. A hard stop may slow care in emergencies. Coaching works only if the incentives for shortcuts are also removed.

Conclusion

A nurse's override of the barcode scanner led to a wrong-patient dose, but the override had become the unit's normal workaround. Marx's framework placed the choice as at-risk behavior and the slip as human error, calling for coaching and system fixes rather than discipline. Reason's model and the high reliability review showed why handling this report fairly protects the reporting that keeps patients safe.

References

Frankel, A. S., Leonard, M. W., & Denham, C. R. (2006). Fair and just culture, team behavior, and leadership engagement: The tools to achieve high reliability. Health Services Research, 41(4 Pt 2), 1690-1709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00572.x

Marx, D. (2001). Patient safety and the "just culture": A primer for health care executives. Columbia University.

Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate.

What the NUR 7020 Module 6 instructions ask for

Professionalism is one of the processes behind quality nursing outcomes in TESU's catalog description of NUR-7020, and because the syllabus is held inside the course, the final module is planned as a professional accountability paper built on a just culture review. Plan an administration paper that describes an error or near miss factually, explains a just culture framework accurately, places each part of the event in the right category with reasons, connects the response to the organization's safety culture, describes the manager's response to the individual and to the patient and identifies the system fixes with measures. In other sections the topic is a professional practice question, scope of practice or delegation for example. Check whether the brief requires the organization's own just culture algorithm and whether disclosure to the patient must be addressed, and remove every identifying detail if the event is real.

How the NUR 7020 Module 6 example is put together

An invented Bayonne medical unit, a failed wristband printer and a nurse's override that led to a wrong-patient beta blocker open the paper. Marx's three behaviors are explained, and a three-row table sorts the override into the shortcut category and the wrong-patient slip into honest error. Reason's model shows why handling a self-report fairly protects the reporting culture. A high reliability review adds the need for consistent methods and leadership follow-through. The manager's coaching, disclosure to the patient and system fixes follow, with the measures and limits ahead of the closing. Annotations explain separating the choice from the slip and pairing fairness with honesty. A short section on safety rounds shows the leader following through until other causes of overrides surface.

Reading the NUR 7020 Module 6 grading rubric

Just culture papers earn credit for a factual account of the event, an accurate explanation of the framework, careful placement of each behavior with reasons, a response that matches the category, attention to disclosure and system fixes with measures. Mentors notice when a paper separates a risky choice from the slip that followed it. Connecting the response to the reporting culture shows understanding of why fairness matters. Data on how common the workaround was turns a single event into a system finding, and leader follow-through on rounds shows the culture is more than a policy. Accurate citations of the framework and the safety culture model, including books and reports, complete the paper.

NUR 7020 Module 6 help: mistakes that cost marks

Just culture papers often call every error a system problem or every workaround reckless; place each behavior using the framework's definitions. Another frequent gap is forgetting the patient, who is owed an explanation and an apology. Find out how common the workaround is before deciding the response. Fix the system conditions that made the shortcut normal. Tell the unit how the report was handled, without names. Keep asking on rounds what still pushes staff toward shortcuts, and report back on what changed. The Bayonne review offers one model; send your own event and a first draft comes back free.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More NUR 7020 and M.S. in Nursing, Nursing Administration sample papers

NUR 7020 Module 6 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 7020 Module 6 sample paper?

The just culture paper about an invented barcode workaround on a Bayonne medical unit, from the event to the system fixes, can be read in full above.

What are the three behaviors in a just culture?

Marx's three: an honest slip (console the person), a risky shortcut taken without seeing the risk (coach) and conscious disregard of a serious risk (sanction).

What is at-risk behavior?

A risky shortcut the person does not see as risky, usually because the whole unit has drifted into doing it.

What are the parts of Reason's safety culture?

An informed culture built on reporting, just, flexible and learning cultures, each depending on the others.

Why not discipline a nurse who reports her own error?

Discipline for a system-driven error discourages reporting, and a reporting culture depends on how the last report was handled.