NUR 7000 Curriculum Theory and Development in Nursing Education sample papers, module by module

Reviewed by Gwyneth Ollerton, MSN, RN · Curriculum Theory and Development in Nursing Education · Thomas Edison State University · Free custom samples in 24–48h

NUR-7000 moves TESU’s nurse educator students from teaching a class to shaping a whole program: where nursing curricula came from, how competencies and concepts organize them, how courses are designed backward from outcomes and how programs are evaluated. The six samples here are MSN curriculum papers, from a program philosophy grounded in a century of reports to a CIPP evaluation of a falling licensure pass rate.

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. NUR-7000 is TESU’s Curriculum Theory and Development in Nursing Education course. A nurse educator course in TESU’s MSN on curriculum development, design, implementation and evaluation, examining the historical and philosophical foundations of nursing education and the educator’s role between practice, research and curriculum. Searches like "nur 7000 module 3 assignment example", "NUR7000 sample paper", and "NUR-7000 module samples" land on this page.

What NUR-7000 is really about

Curriculum papers are judged by whether a faculty committee could adopt them. A strong one knows the history it is answering, maps courses to competencies with evidence of learning, cuts content rather than adding it, designs from outcomes backward, builds partnerships with the units where graduates will work and evaluates the program with a model, not only a pass rate.

TESU does not post the NUR-7000 syllabus, so the six drawers below are planned from its catalog description. Programs, faculty and figures in the samples are invented; reports, standards, models and studies are cited from their published sources.

What NUR-7000’s assessments ask for

Expect philosophy statements grounded in history, curriculum maps against the 2021 AACN Essentials and QSEN competencies, concept-based redesigns that reduce content saturation, course plans built with backward design and Bloom’s revised taxonomy, practice partnership proposals and program evaluations using CIPP or Kirkpatrick.

Where students lose points in NUR-7000

Marks are lost when a philosophy could belong to any school, competencies are listed but not assessed, a concept curriculum keeps every old lecture, objectives use verbs like understand, a partnership exists only on paper and evaluation stops at a single pass rate.

The NUR-7000 drawers

Module 1

NUR-7000 Module 1 assignment example

Module 1: asked to draft the philosophy for an invented Union County university's new BSN, a nurse educator traces the Goldmark report's case against training schools that used students as hospital labor, Brown's call for college-based nursing education and the Carnegie study's four shifts, then writes a philosophy that answers each. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 2

NUR-7000 Module 2 assignment example

Module 2: preparing an invented Mercer County BSN for the 2021 AACN Essentials, a curriculum committee chair maps courses against the ten domains and eight concepts, the six QSEN competencies and the Institute of Medicine's five core competencies for health professionals, then plans assessments for the gaps. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 3

NUR-7000 Module 3 assignment example

Module 3: when an invented Hudson County program's three medical-surgical courses cover 140 diseases in 135 lecture hours, a nurse educator uses Giddens and Brady's case against content saturation, Erickson's structure of knowledge and the competency framework's eight concepts to rebuild the sequence around concepts and exemplars. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 4

NUR-7000 Module 4 assignment example

Module 4: rebuilding an invented Camden County BSN's community health course, a nurse educator follows Tyler's four questions, Wiggins and McTighe's three stages of backward design and Anderson and Krathwohl's revised taxonomy to write outcomes, design a community assessment and then plan the learning. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 5

NUR-7000 Module 5 assignment example

Module 5: to bridge an invented Burlington County program's senior practicum and its partner hospital's new graduate needs, a nurse educator proposes a dedicated education unit using the original DEU model, the Transition to Practice study and the Carnegie study's call to integrate classroom and clinical learning. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 6

NUR-7000 Module 6 assignment example

Module 6: when an invented Ocean County program's first-time licensure pass rate falls to 74 percent, a nurse educator evaluates it with Stufflebeam's CIPP model, the Kirkpatrick levels and accreditation standards that expect 80 percent, finding causes in context, inputs and process rather than students alone. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

Thomas Edison State University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a NUR-7000 sample the right way

Read a sample to see a curriculum argument built from history, standards and evidence into something a faculty committee could vote on. Share the brief and your program’s situation and a first draft comes back free within 24 to 48 hours.

How these samples are written

NUR-7000 samples describe invented New Jersey nursing programs and faculty, label local figures as illustrative and cite reports, accreditation standards and studies as published.

NUR-7000 questions, answered

Does NUR-7000 require background?

TESU advises knowledge equivalent to NUR-6300 before registering, since the course builds on teaching theory.

Is there a public syllabus for NUR-7000?

TESU keeps it inside the course; these drawers follow its catalog description.

Are these programs real?

No; each program and its figures are invented, while the reports and standards cited are real.