| Course | NUR-6340 Healthcare Professional Precepting Ensuring Career Success |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Precepting paper: reflective practice and experienced preceptees |
| Length | About 1,036 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | M.S. in Nursing, Nurse Educator |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 6340 Module 6
Fifteen Years of Experience, Week One in the ICU: Reflective Precepting in Princeton
Student Name
M.S. in Nursing, Nurse Educator, Thomas Edison State University
NUR-6340: Healthcare Professional Precepting: Ensuring Career Success
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Fifteen Years of Experience, Week One in the ICU: Reflective Precepting in Princeton
An Expert in a New Place
The hospital and the nurses are invented. A 24-bed medical-surgical ICU at a hospital in Princeton accepts experienced nurses from other units when positions open. Gloria has worked on a medical-surgical unit for fifteen years, precepted many new graduates herself and is widely respected. She transferred to the ICU this month. Her preceptor, the writer of this paper, has been an ICU nurse for nine years and is completing an MSN.
In the first week, Gloria was efficient and confident with tasks she knew, such as wound care and family communication, and visibly frustrated with tasks she did not, such as titrating vasoactive drips. When the preceptor suggested a different approach to a sedation assessment, Gloria said, "I've been doing this for fifteen years." The preceptor realized that the usual approach to orientation, built for new graduates, would not work.
Reflection in Practice
Schön (1983) described professionals as reflective practitioners. He separated reflection during the act, when a practitioner rethinks on the spot because something unexpected happens, from reflection after the act, when the practitioner looks back. He argued that skilled professionals rely on tacit knowledge they cannot fully express and that surprises are moments when this knowledge can be examined and revised.
For Gloria, much of her expertise was tacit, built over years on a different unit. In the ICU, some of it transferred and some did not. Moments of surprise, such as a blood pressure that did not respond as expected, were opportunities to examine assumptions.
A Structure for Reflection
Gibbs (1988) laid out a reflective cycle of six stages: describing the event, naming one's feelings, judging what went well and badly, making sense of it, conclusion about what else could have been done and an action plan for next time. The cycle keeps reflection from stopping at a story, pushing it on toward a lesson.
Changing Assumptions
Mezirow (1991) described transformative learning, in which adults revise the frames of reference through which they interpret experience. Such learning often starts with what Mezirow called a disorienting dilemma, when experience refuses to fit one's assumptions, and proceeds through critical reflection on those assumptions, discussion with others and trying new roles. Mezirow argued that adult learning is most powerful when it changes not only what people know but how they see.
Gloria's comment about fifteen years was a sign that her frame, built on medical-surgical nursing, was being challenged. Transformative learning suggested that the challenge itself could become the start of learning, if handled with respect.
| Source | Key idea | Precepting approach |
|---|---|---|
| Schön (1983) | Reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action; tacit knowledge | Pause at surprises; debrief after shifts |
| Gibbs (1988) | Six-stage cycle from description to action plan | Structure for weekly reflection |
| Mezirow (1991) | Revising assumptions through disorienting dilemmas | Treat frustration as a sign of learning, not resistance |
The Precepting Plan
The preceptor began by asking Gloria what she already knew and what she wanted to learn, and they built the orientation around her answers. Areas where her skills transferred, such as family communication and wound care, were checked briefly and signed off. Areas new to her, such as hemodynamic monitoring, drips and ventilator care, received more time.
During shifts, the preceptor practiced reflection-in-action aloud, describing what she noticed and how she was deciding, and invited Gloria to do the same. When something surprising happened, they paused, if safe, to ask what each expected and why.
After each shift, they spent ten minutes on reflection-on-action. Once a week, Gloria wrote a short reflection using Gibbs's cycle on one event, and they discussed it together.
Respecting Expertise
The preceptor learned to name Gloria's expertise explicitly. When Gloria handled a difficult conversation with a dying patient's son, the preceptor told her afterward what she had done well and asked her to lead the next family meeting. This was not flattery; it was a deliberate signal that Gloria's fifteen years mattered in the ICU, even as she learned new skills. Gloria later said that hearing her expertise recognized made it easier to admit what she did not know. The preceptor also asked the unit manager to let Gloria help orient the next transfer nurse in family communication, giving her a teaching role from early on.
A Turning Point
In week three, Gloria's patient on norepinephrine had a falling blood pressure. Her medical-surgical instinct was to give a fluid bolus first, which had served her well for years. The preceptor asked her to reflect in action: what else could explain this? Together they checked the infusion line and found it disconnected. Afterward, Gloria wrote a Gibbs reflection on the event, describing her frustration, her assumption and what she had learned about ICU-specific causes. She said later that this was when she stopped feeling like a failure and started feeling like a learner.
What the Preceptor Learned
Reflection ran both ways. Gloria asked questions about routines the preceptor had never questioned, such as why families were asked to leave during morning rounds. The preceptor took the question to the unit council, which began a trial of family presence on rounds. Gloria's skill with difficult family conversations also taught the preceptor approaches she had not used.
How Orientation Ended
Gloria completed orientation in ten weeks, two fewer than the standard plan for new graduates and two more than she initially expected. At their final meeting, the preceptor and Gloria reviewed her reflections together. Gloria noted that her early frustration had come from feeling incompetent after years of competence, and that reflection had helped her see the frustration as part of learning. Both agreed to continue a monthly coffee for the rest of the year.
Limits
Reflective writing can become routine if overused. Not every experienced nurse welcomes reflection, and some prefer a checklist. One relationship cannot show that the approach works generally.
Conclusion
An experienced nurse in a new specialty is both expert and beginner. Schön's reflection, Gibbs's cycle and Mezirow's transformative learning helped the preceptor treat Gloria's frustration as the start of learning, build orientation around what she knew and make reflection part of every shift. The preceptor learned too, showing that precepting can benefit everyone involved.
References
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Reading the NUR 6340 Module 6 assignment instructions
TESU's catalog description of NUR-6340 describes precepting as a mutually reflective system and includes preceptees new to a practice environment, and as no syllabus is posted, module six is a reflective precepting paper. It should describe a preceptee who brings experience into a new setting, explains reflective practice and adult learning theory accurately, builds a plan that uses the preceptee's existing knowledge, structures reflection during and after practice, shows a turning point and describes what the preceptor learned. Some sections ask for a reflective journal from the student's own precepting experience. Check whether the brief requires a specific reflective model, such as Gibbs or Johns, and whether reflections should be quoted. Describe how orientation ended and what both nurses took from it.
How the NUR 6340 Module 6 example is put together
An invented medical-surgical nurse of fifteen years transferring to a Princeton ICU, and her frustration in week one, open the paper. Schön's two kinds of reflection, Gibbs's reflective cycle and Mezirow's transformative learning are explained, and each reshapes the preceptor's approach. The plan builds on what the nurse knows, models reflection aloud and uses weekly Gibbs reflections. A turning point with a disconnected norepinephrine line and the preceptor's own learning follow, then limits and conclusion. Annotations note theory applied to a specific relationship and precepting as mutual reflection. Sections on respecting the nurse's expertise and on how orientation ended complete the story.
Where the marks sit in the NUR 6340 Module 6 rubric
Reflective precepting papers earn credit for a realistic experienced preceptee, accurate explanation of reflective and adult learning theory, a plan built on the preceptee's existing knowledge, structured reflection during and after practice, a concrete turning point and evidence of the preceptor's own learning. Mentors notice when frustration is read as a sign of learning rather than resistance. Signing off transferred skills quickly shows respect for experience. Changing a unit practice because of a preceptee's question shows the mutual benefit the course describes. Books should be cited with original publishers and years. Explicitly recognizing the preceptee's existing expertise shows the respect adult learning theory calls for. Describing what the preceptor learned makes the course's idea of mutual benefit concrete.
Common NUR 6340 Module 6 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Precepting experienced nurses with a new graduate checklist wastes their knowledge; start by asking what they know. Another common gap is reflection described but never shown. Model reflection aloud during care. Use a reflective cycle for one event a week. Describe a turning point. Say what you learned from the preceptee. The desk will write a first draft about your own experienced preceptee at no charge, following the Princeton paper's structure. Name the preceptee's expertise out loud, and give them a chance to teach what they already know well. Keep reflection short enough that it continues after the first weeks.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 6340 and M.S. in Nursing, Nurse Educator sample papers
- NUR 6340 Module 1: Transition Shock Paper: A New Graduate's First Four Months in an Emergency Department
- NUR 6340 Module 2: Teaching in the Moment Paper: The One-Minute Preceptor on a Medical Unit
- NUR 6340 Module 3: Feedback Paper: A Struggling Orientee and a Remediation Plan
- NUR 6340 Module 4: Retention Paper: Building a Nurse Residency With Preceptors at Its Center
- NUR 6340 Module 5: Preceptor Support Paper: Workload, Recognition and Preparation
- NUR 6300 Module 4: Clinical Judgment Paper: Teaching Noticing on a Medical-Surgical Clinical Unit
- NUR 7100 Module 1: Test Validity Paper: A Test Blueprint and Validity Evidence for a Medical-Surgical Final
- NUR 7000 Module 2: Competency Paper: Mapping a BSN Curriculum to the AACN Essentials and QSEN
NUR 6340 Module 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 6340 Module 6 sample paper?
The reflective precepting paper about an experienced nurse moving into an invented Princeton ICU, from week one to the turning point, appears on this page.
What is reflection-in-action?
Rethinking an action in the middle of it, usually because something unexpected has happened, as Schön described.
What are the stages of Gibbs's reflective cycle?
Six steps: say what happened, how you felt, what went well or badly, what it means, what else you could have done and what you will do next time.
What is transformative learning?
Mezirow's account of adults revising the assumptions through which they interpret experience, often after a disorienting dilemma.
How should experienced nurses be precepted in a new specialty?
By building on what they know, signing off transferred skills, focusing on new areas and using reflection to examine assumptions.