NUR 5160 Module 2 Subjective History Write-Up Example

Reviewed by Gwyneth Ollerton, MSN, RN Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This NUR 5160 Module 2 sample is a complete subjective section for one focused problem, six weeks of drenching night sweats in a forty-one-year-old accountant who volunteers overnight at a shelter, followed by the reasoning that organized it. Written for Advanced Health Assessment in the TESU MSN program, it records the chief concern in the patient's words, characterizes the symptom precisely, documents pertinent negatives across infection, malignancy, endocrine and medication causes, and shows why the shelter exposure turns a usually benign symptom into a concern for active tuberculosis. The course carries the code NUR-5160 at TESU. Three references support it, including a systematic review of night sweats.

CourseNUR-5160 Advanced Health Assessment
ModuleModule 2
Paper typeSubjective history write-up
LengthAbout 1,027 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramMaster of Science in Nursing
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 5160 Module 2

1

Six Weeks of Drenching Sweats: A Complete Subjective Section and the Reasoning That Organized It

Student Name

Master of Science in Nursing (MSN), Thomas Edison State University

NUR-5160: Advanced Health Assessment

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the symptom and duration and promises the reasoning behind the history, which is what separates a graduate subjective section from a list of questions. Mentors reading history write-ups want to see why each question was asked.
2

Six Weeks of Drenching Sweats: A Complete Subjective Section and the Reasoning That Organized It

The second module of Advanced Health Assessment focuses on history taking, and the assignment asks for a complete subjective section done well. Night sweats are a useful symptom for the exercise because they are common, usually benign and occasionally the first sign of something serious. A good history has to sort those possibilities before any examination or testing begins. This paper presents the subjective section for a composite patient, a forty-one-year-old accountant who volunteers weekly at an overnight shelter, followed by an explanation of how the history was organized. Identifying details are invented.

Chief Concern and History of Present Illness

Chief concern, in the patient's words: I've been soaking the sheets most nights for about six weeks. History of present illness: the patient describes drenching sweats on four or five nights a week for six weeks, beginning without an obvious trigger, waking them between two and four in the morning and requiring a change of shirt and sometimes sheets. The bedroom is kept cool and the patient sleeps with one blanket. Sweats do not occur during the day. The patient has noticed a weight loss of about four kilograms over two months without trying, and a dry cough for about three weeks, worse in the morning. The patient has felt warm in the evenings but has not measured a temperature. There is no hemoptysis, chest pain or shortness of breath.

Associated and pertinent negative symptoms: no hot flushes during the day, no menstrual change, no palpitations, tremor or heat intolerance, no new medications or dose changes, no recent travel outside the state, no itching, no new lumps noticed in the neck, armpits or groin, no abdominal pain, no change in bowel habit, no blood in stool, no anxiety attacks and no symptoms of low blood sugar on waking. The patient has tried nothing for the sweats and is mainly worried because a shelter guest was taken to the hospital two months ago with what staff described as a serious lung infection.

What this page is doingThe history of present illness characterizes the symptom precisely, then lists associated findings and negatives that address the main categories of cause. Mentors at this level look for a history whose negatives map to a differential diagnosis, even though the module itself focuses on subjective data.
3

Background Histories

Past medical history: seasonal allergic rhinitis; no diabetes, thyroid disease, HIV infection or cancer; no known prior positive tuberculosis test, though the patient recalls a skin test was required for a job about fifteen years ago and was negative. Surgical history: appendectomy at nineteen. Medications: cetirizine 10 milligrams daily in spring; no antidepressants, no hormone therapy, no regular over-the-counter drugs. Allergies: penicillin, rash in childhood. Family history: type 2 diabetes in the mother; lung cancer was the cause of the father's death at seventy after a lifetime of smoking; no family history of lymphoma or tuberculosis known.

Social history: works as a staff accountant; has volunteered one overnight shift a week for three years at an emergency shelter, sleeping in a staff room adjacent to the dormitory. Never smoker; alcohol rarely; no injection or other drug use. Sexual history: one partner for six years, no new partners, has not had an HIV test in more than ten years. Lives with partner, no children, no pets. Born in the United States, no history of incarceration, no recent travel.

Review of Systems

Constitutional: positive for night sweats, unintentional weight loss and subjective evening warmth; negative for chills or rigors. Skin: no rash, itching or new lesions. Head, eyes, ears, nose and throat: no sore throat, sinus pain or dental pain. Respiratory: dry cough for three weeks; no hemoptysis, wheeze or dyspnea. Cardiovascular: no chest pain, palpitations or edema. Gastrointestinal: appetite somewhat reduced; no nausea, abdominal pain or change in stools. Genitourinary: no dysuria or hematuria. Musculoskeletal: no joint pain or swelling. Neurological: no headache or weakness. Endocrine: no heat or cold intolerance, polyuria or polydipsia. Hematologic and lymphatic: no easy bruising and no lumps noticed. Psychiatric: mild worry about the symptoms; sleep otherwise good; no low mood.

How the History Was Organized

Mold et al. (2012) reviewed the literature on night sweats and concluded that the symptom is common and nonspecific, that many suggested causes are poorly supported, and that no evidence-based algorithm for evaluation exists. That finding shaped the history in two ways. First, because the symptom alone points nowhere, the history had to characterize it precisely, including timing, severity, pattern and the bedroom environment, so that ordinary explanations such as a warm room or heavy bedding could be set aside. Second, because no algorithm exists, the questions had to be organized around the categories of cause that matter most if missed: infection, malignancy, endocrine and medication causes, and less dangerous causes such as anxiety or gastroesophageal reflux.

Infection drove several questions. The combination of night sweats, weight loss, cough for more than two weeks and possible fever, in a person with repeated exposure in a congregate setting, matches the symptom pattern public health guidance lists for active tuberculosis (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025). That is why the history asks about the prior skin test, the shelter guest's illness, the sleeping arrangement at the shelter, travel, incarceration and HIV risk. Malignancy, particularly lymphoma, drove the questions about lumps, itching and weight. Endocrine and medication causes drove the questions about heat intolerance, menstrual change, hypoglycemia and antidepressants.

Bickley et al. (2021) teach that a symptom should be explored with its attributes, its associated symptoms and the setting in which it occurs, and the history above follows that pattern. The setting, in this case, carries the most weight: a symptom that would usually be benign becomes urgent when the history places the patient beside a person with a serious lung infection.

What this page is doingThe analysis explains why each cluster of questions was asked, linking the history to a systematic review and public health guidance. This is the reasoning mentors want to see in a graduate history module: questions chosen to test possibilities, not asked by habit.
4

Summary for the Next Clinician

A forty-one-year-old with six weeks of drenching night sweats, four kilograms of unintentional weight loss, three weeks of dry cough and subjective evening fever, with weekly overnight exposure in a congregate shelter where a guest was recently hospitalized with a serious lung infection, and a negative tuberculin skin test about fifteen years ago. No symptoms suggesting thyroid, medication, hormonal or hypoglycemic causes; no reported lymphadenopathy or itching. The history raises concern for active pulmonary tuberculosis and calls for examination, chest imaging, tuberculosis testing and HIV testing, with lymphoma remaining on the list until excluded.

References

Bickley, L. S., Szilagyi, P. G., Hoffman, R. M., & Soriano, R. P. (2021). Bates' guide to physical examination and history taking (13th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Signs and symptoms of tuberculosis. https://www.cdc.gov/tb/signs-symptoms/index.html

Mold, J. W., Holtzclaw, B. J., & McCarthy, L. (2012). Night sweats: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 25(6), 878-893. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.06.120033

NUR 5160 Module 2 instructions, in plain terms

The second module of NUR-5160 typically focuses on history taking. The usual task is a full subjective database for a volunteer or standardized case, chief concern through review of systems, with a thorough symptom analysis in the middle, and to explain how your questions were organized. Some sections give a scenario and others ask you to interview a volunteer. The TESU course site holds the exact template; check whether a brief summary statement is expected at the end, whether the reasoning section counts toward length, and whether objective data must be excluded from this module's write-up. Keep vital signs and examination findings out of this paper unless the directions say otherwise.

How the NUR 5160 Module 2 example is put together

The example presents the subjective database first, as it would appear in a record: the chief concern quoted, a history of present illness that characterizes timing, severity and setting, and associated symptoms and pertinent negatives grouped by possible cause. Past, medication, family and social histories follow, with exposure history in detail. A full review of systems records positives and negatives system by system. The reasoning section uses a systematic review to explain why precise characterization matters, then shows how infection, malignancy and endocrine possibilities shaped the questions. A short summary statement hands the history to the next clinician. The closing summary is short enough for a covering clinician to act on at a glance.

Reading the NUR 5160 Module 2 grading rubric

Subjective history write-ups at the graduate level are usually graded on completeness, a thorough symptom analysis, relevant pertinent negatives, organization, the reasoning behind the questions, and writing. Mentors expect the history of present illness to characterize the symptom with its attributes and setting, and they look for negatives that address the main causes a clinician must not miss. Exposure, travel, occupational and sexual histories earn credit when they are relevant to the problem. A reasoning section is strongest when it is supported by evidence and shows how possibilities shaped the questions. A concise summary statement at the end often distinguishes the top band. Precise timing and setting of the main symptom often decide the history row.

NUR 5160 Module 2 help: mistakes that cost marks

The most common weakness in a graduate subjective section is a review of systems that is long but disconnected from the chief concern. Ask yourself which conditions you are trying to rule in or out, and make sure your negatives cover them. Another frequent problem is placing examination findings in the subjective section; keep them out. Students also skip exposure history, which is often where the diagnosis lies. Quote the chief concern and characterize the main symptom fully before moving on. End with a summary statement that another clinician could act on. Interview notes can be turned into a finished subjective section by the desk. Read the review of systems back against your list of possible causes.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More NUR 5160 and Master of Science in Nursing sample papers

NUR 5160 Module 2 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 5160 Module 2 sample paper?

It sits above in full: a night sweats history, then the reasoning behind its questions, with a margin note per sheet. Bring your own case to the same two-part shape.

What belongs in a complete subjective section?

A line identifying the patient and the informant, the concern quoted as spoken, a present illness section with symptom attributes and pertinent negatives, past medical and surgical history, medications, allergies, family history, social history and a review of systems.

How do I choose pertinent negatives?

List the important causes of the chief concern, especially those that would be dangerous to miss, and ask about the symptoms that would point to each. Record the ones that are absent as pertinent negatives.

Should the NUR-5160 history include a differential diagnosis?

The subjective module usually focuses on data, but a short reasoning section or summary showing which possibilities guided your questions is often welcome. Check your directions before adding a full differential.

Why does exposure history matter so much?

Many symptoms are nonspecific until the setting is known. Occupational, travel, housing and congregate exposures can change a benign symptom into an urgent one, so the history should explore them whenever infection is possible.