| Course | LDR-3450 Leading Organizational Change |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Module 2 written assignment: the change agent and a leader's style |
| Length | About 764 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Bachelor of Science in Organizational Leadership |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for LDR 3450 Module 2
Telling Is Not Leading: Rethinking My Style as a Change Agent
Student Name
Bachelor of Science in Organizational Leadership, Thomas Edison State University
LDR-3450: Leading Organizational Change
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Telling Is Not Leading: Rethinking My Style as a Change Agent
How I Led the Rollout
When the owners approved the field service app, I announced it at a Monday meeting, handed out tablets and scheduled training. I explained the benefits to billing and told technicians the paper forms would end in two months. When technicians complained, I repeated the deadline. Looking back, I acted as if the change would succeed because I had decided it should. I did hold one question session, but I spent most of it explaining features rather than listening, and technicians left with their concerns unanswered. Two crew leads later told me they had decided at that meeting that the app was "the office's project," not theirs. I had also chosen the launch date to fit the office's billing cycle rather than our slow season, so the first weeks of the change landed in the middle of the spring tune-up rush, when technicians were busiest and least patient with anything new.
Leadership Styles in Change
Cameron and Green (2024) describe several roles a leader can take in change, from directing the change from the top to engaging people in shaping it, and argue that the style should fit the change and the people. Higgs and Rowland (2005) studied change leadership in organizations and identified three broad leader behaviors: shaping behavior, in which the leader is the center of the change and tells people what to do; framing change, in which the leader sets the direction and helps people understand why; and creating capacity, in which the leader builds others' ability to change. They found that shaping behavior was negatively related to change success, while framing and building capacity were positively related.
My rollout was almost pure shaping. I was at the center, I set the deadline and I treated questions as resistance.
Vision and Commitment
I also lacked a vision technicians could share. "Faster billing" is a goal for the office, not for a technician on a roof in August. Herold et al. (2008) found that leaders' change-specific behaviors, such as communicating why a change matters and involving employees, were related to employees' commitment to a change, especially when the change affected them personally and deeply. For technicians, the app changes how they spend every hour of the day; it is exactly the kind of change where engaging leadership matters most. A better vision would have answered the technician's question, "What is in it for me and my customers?", before asking for anything. The three benefits technicians care about most, fewer return trips for missing parts, fewer billing disputes with customers and proof of good work, were all available in the app; I simply never said so.
What Kind of Change Agent I Want to Be
The module's self-assessment placed me toward the directive end of the range. That style has a place: when a refrigerant leak threatens a hospital's cooling, someone has to give clear orders. But for a change in how people work every day, I need to frame and build capacity. I will start by rewriting the vision in technicians' terms: "Fewer trips back to the shop, fewer callbacks and a record of your work that customers and the company can see." I will ask each crew lead to test the app on one improvement they care about, such as checking parts availability before driving to a job. And I will make myself less central: Priya and Dana, who adopted the app early, will run the next training sessions. I will also change how I run meetings about the app: instead of presenting updates, I will open each one by asking crews what slowed them down that week and close by saying what I will fix before the next meeting.
Possible Pitfalls
Engaging styles take time, and the owners want the paper forms gone by summer. I will negotiate a month's extension in exchange for weekly adoption reports, so the owners can see progress. I also risk overcorrecting into vagueness; the deadline will remain, but it will be explained. I will also ask a crew lead I trust to tell me when I slip back into telling, since habits under pressure are hard to see from the inside.
Conclusion
I led the rollout as a director, and the research suggests that is the style least likely to work for a change that touches people's daily work. Moving toward framing and building capacity, with a vision in technicians' own terms, gives the change a better chance and gives me a style I can use in future changes.
References
Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2024). Making sense of change management (6th ed.). Kogan Page.
Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., & Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees' commitment to a change: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.346
Higgs, M., & Rowland, D. (2005). All changes great and small: Exploring approaches to change and its leadership. Journal of Change Management, 5(2), 121-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010500082902
Reading the LDR 3450 Module 2 assignment instructions
The second reflective assignment asks about the change agent's role and style: how a leader's vision, role and approach affect a change, and what kind of change agent you are. Expect to reflect on a change you led or observed, compare the leader's style with approaches described in the readings and research, and consider how you would lead differently. Honest self-assessment matters more than a flattering picture. Use research on change leadership to explain what worked or failed, and state specific changes in how you will lead. Include the result of the module's self-assessment if you completed one, and say where it matched your behavior.
Inside the LDR 3450 Module 2 example
The paper opens with a candid account of how the writer introduced a change. A section uses the textbook and a study of change leadership behaviors to classify the writer's approach. A section explains why the vision failed to engage technicians, supported by research on commitment to change. A section describes the change agent the writer wants to be, with specific actions. A short section addresses pitfalls, and the conclusion restates the lesson in plain language. The writer accepts what the research says about his own approach, which gives the reflection its honesty, and each planned change answers a specific failing. Its pitfalls section shows the plan is realistic.
LDR 3450 Module 2 rubric: what earns full marks
Style reflections earn credit for candor about one's own approach, correct use of the readings on change agents, research support and concrete plans. Reflections that classify their own behavior using a research framework, and accept what it shows, demonstrate maturity. Explaining why a style fits or fails a particular kind of change shows understanding beyond labels. Plans that address the tension between engagement and deadlines show realism and give the reflection practical weight. Mentors also credit a reflection that explains why the writer's natural style felt right at the time, since understanding the pull of a habit is the first step to changing it. A realistic plan for balancing engagement with the owners' deadline shows practical judgment.
LDR 3450 Module 2 help from the desk
Students lose points by describing an ideal style rather than their own, by treating one style as always right or by ignoring the vision's role. Others reflect without connecting to the readings. Describe what you actually did. Compare it with a framework from the readings or research. Explain why the style fit or did not fit the change. Plan specific behavior changes with a realistic view of constraints. Ask someone who worked under you during the change how they saw your style, and use what they say. Name one specific way your own behavior will differ when you next lead a change at work, and the date you plan to try that new habit. A free first sample on your own LDR-3450 Module 2 assignment is available on request.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More LDR 3450 and Bachelor of Science in Organizational Leadership sample papers
- LDR 3450 Module 1: Written Assignment: How Four Technicians Experience the Same Change
- LDR 3450 Module 3: Written Assignment: Tools for Planning the Rollout's Second Phase
- LDR 3450 Module 4: Final Paper: Leading a Merger of Two Family Trade Contractors
- LDR 3050 Module 3: Reflection Paper: Balancing the Pick Rate and the People
- LDR 4220 Module 3: Case Study: Procter and Gamble's Organization 2005 and the Matrix Problem
- MAN 4150 Module 3: Implementation Written Assignment
- MAN 3760 Module 1: Self-Assessment: How a Ramp Supervisor Communicates Under Pressure
LDR 3450 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free LDR 3450 Module 2 sample paper?
A service manager's reflection on leading an app rollout by telling, and the change agent he wants to become, is above.
What are shaping, framing and creating capacity?
Three change leadership behaviors Higgs and Rowland identified: leader-centered direction, setting direction with understanding, and building others' ability to change.
Which change leadership behaviors work best?
Research found framing and building capacity related to success and leader-centered shaping related negatively.
Why does personal impact matter?
Engaging change leadership matters most when a change strongly affects employees' own work.
Is a directive style ever appropriate in change?
Yes, in emergencies or when quick, clear action is needed, but less so for changes in daily work.