HRM 7600 Module 2 HR Decisions in the Legal Environment Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

In this HRM 7600 Module 2 sample paper, an HR decision is made inside its legal and economic environment, the module's theme. Prepared for the Master of Business Administration (MBA) at TESU, it asks whether a composite heating and cooling contractor with 240 technicians in Minnesota and Wisconsin should require noncompete agreements after nine technicians left for a rival. It sets out Minnesota's 2023 ban, Wisconsin's reasonableness statute and the FTC rule that a court set aside in 2024 and the agency abandoned in 2025, adds research finding about 18 percent of U.S. workers bound by noncompetes, and compares four options in a table. It recommends nonsolicitation agreements and a retention program instead. HRM-7600 is the course's code.

CourseHRM-7600 Human Resource Management - Talent Management
ModuleModule 2
Paper typeWritten assignment: decision making in the HR environment
LengthAbout 862 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramMaster of Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HRM 7600 Module 2

1

Nine Technicians Gone: Should a Two-State Contractor Use Noncompetes?

Student Name

Master of Business Administration, Thomas Edison State University

HRM-7600: Human Resource Management - Talent Management

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the loss that prompted the decision. The contractor is a composite; the legal and research facts are real and cited.
2

Nine Technicians Gone: Should a Two-State Contractor Use Noncompetes?

DeNisi and Griffin (2020) present HR decisions as choices made within an environment of laws, economic conditions and organizational goals. A sound decision defines the problem, identifies options, gathers evidence and weighs legal limits alongside costs and benefits. This paper applies that approach to North Star Comfort, a composite HVAC installer and service company with 240 field technicians in the Minneapolis and Eau Claire areas. Last year nine experienced technicians left for a competitor, and two took customer service contracts with them. The owners have asked whether every technician should sign a noncompete agreement.

Defining the Problem

The owners' instinct is to prevent departures, but the real problems are narrower. The firm loses money when departing technicians take customers, and it loses capability when experienced people leave faster than it can train replacements. A noncompete addresses both only indirectly, by making it harder to leave, and it may create new problems in recruiting and morale. Framing the decision as protecting customer relationships and keeping skilled technicians opens a wider set of options.

The Legal Environment

The law differs across the firm's two states and has shifted nationally. Minnesota prohibits noncompete agreements with employees and independent contractors entered into on or after July 1, 2023, with narrow exceptions such as the sale of a business (Minn. Stat. § 181.988, 2025). Any noncompete for the firm's Minnesota technicians would therefore be void. Wisconsin permits noncompetes only if the restriction is reasonably necessary to protect the employer and reasonable in time and territory, and its courts will strike an unreasonable covenant entirely rather than rewrite it (Wis. Stat. § 103.465, 2025).

At the federal level, the Federal Trade Commission issued a rule in 2024 that would have banned most noncompetes nationwide (Federal Trade Commission, 2024). A federal district court set the rule aside before it took effect, and in September 2025 the Commission voted to dismiss its appeals and accept that outcome (Federal Trade Commission, 2025). The agency has said it will continue to challenge particular noncompetes case by case. For an employer, the practical conclusion is that federal law no longer bans noncompetes outright, but state law and enforcement risk still matter.

The Economic Environment and the Evidence

Skilled trades are in short supply, so technicians have many choices. A noncompete that makes a job less attractive may cost the firm more in recruiting than it saves in retention. Starr et al. (2021), surveying more than 11,000 workers, estimated that about 18 percent of U.S. labor force participants were bound by a noncompete and that about 38 percent had agreed to one at some point. They also found that noncompetes were often used with workers who had no access to trade secrets, and that many employees did not read or negotiate them, which raises questions of fairness and enforceability.

The Options

Four options deserve comparison.

OptionLegal statusEffect on the real problemCost and risk
Noncompetes for all techniciansVoid in Minnesota; uncertain in WisconsinWeak; unenforceable for most staffRecruiting harm, legal fees
Noncompetes for Wisconsin service managers onlyPossible if narrowLimitedLitigation risk if broad
Confidentiality and customer nonsolicitation agreementsGenerally allowed in both states if reasonableStrong for customer contractsLow
Retention bonus and career ladderNo legal limitsStrong for skill lossAbout $180,000 a year

Customer nonsolicitation agreements bar departing employees from soliciting the firm's customers for a set period without stopping them from working in the trade; they are not noncompetes under the Minnesota statute, although they must still be reasonable. A retention bonus of $1,500 paid on each of the second, third and fourth anniversaries, combined with a three-step technician ladder with pay steps for certifications, would cost about $180,000 a year at current headcount.

Recommendation

North Star should not adopt noncompetes. It should require confidentiality and twelve-month customer nonsolicitation agreements from technicians and service managers in both states, drafted by counsel to fit each state's law, and launch the retention bonus and career ladder. The nine departures cost the firm two service contracts and roughly $230,000 in recruiting and training replacements, so the retention program would pay for itself if it prevented most of a year's departures. The trade-off is that the firm gives up a tool that might have deterred a few Wisconsin departures and accepts that technicians remain free to work for competitors. It gains a policy that is enforceable, fair and helpful in recruiting.

Measures

The owners should track voluntary turnover among technicians with more than two years of service, the number of customer contracts lost after departures and acceptance rates on job offers. If experienced turnover does not fall by a third within eighteen months, the bonus amounts or ladder steps should be revisited.

Conclusion

Following the decision process in the course text (DeNisi & Griffin, 2020) changes the question from how to stop people from leaving to how to protect customers and keep skills. In an environment where one state bans noncompetes, the other limits them and federal policy has shifted twice in two years, the stronger choice is a combination of narrow legal protections and positive reasons to stay.

References

DeNisi, A. S., & Griffin, R. W. (2020). HR (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Federal Trade Commission. (2024). Non-compete clause rule. Federal Register, 89, 38342.

Federal Trade Commission. (2025, September 5). Federal Trade Commission files to accede to vacatur of Non-Compete Clause Rule [Press release].

Minn. Stat. § 181.988 (2025). Covenants not to compete void in employment agreements.

Starr, E. P., Prescott, J. J., & Bishara, N. D. (2021). Noncompete agreements in the US labor force. Journal of Law and Economics, 64(1), 53-84. https://doi.org/10.1086/712206

Wis. Stat. § 103.465 (2025). Restrictive covenants in employment contracts.

Reading the HRM 7600 Module 2 assignment instructions

This HRM-7600 written assignment format asks you to make an HR decision within its legal, economic and organizational environment. TESU does not say which modules hold the three assignments, so Module 2 supplies the content here. Define the problem carefully, since the obvious framing is often too narrow. Describe the relevant law for each jurisdiction involved, with citations to statutes or rules, and the economic conditions that affect the choice. Compare at least three options with their legal status, effectiveness and cost, then recommend one with its trade-off and measures. Cite research evidence and the textbook in APA style, and avoid offering legal advice beyond what sources support. Date the legal sources you rely on.

Inside the HRM 7600 Module 2 example

The paper follows the decision steps in the textbook: problem, environment, options, evidence and choice. It reframes the owners' question early, which opens better options. The legal section treats each state separately and explains the federal change in plain terms with sources. A study provides national evidence on how common noncompetes are and how they are used. A table compares four options across legal status, effect and cost, and the recommendation uses the firm's own loss figures to judge the retention program's payback. Measures with a target and a review point close the analysis, and a brief conclusion returns to the reframed question. Each section feeds the final choice. Read it for structure.

Reading the HRM 7600 Module 2 grading rubric

Mentors score HRM-7600 written work on the 0 to 100 scale. They reward a well-defined problem, accurate legal analysis for each jurisdiction, and options compared on legal, practical and financial grounds. Evidence from research and the textbook's decision framework should support the choice. A recommendation earns more when it states what the organization gives up and how success will be measured. Correct citations of statutes, agencies and journals in APA style matter, as does clear organization. Papers that treat the law as the only consideration, or ignore it, tend to score lower than papers that weigh law, economics and strategy together. Specific, dated sources strengthen the analysis and show current knowledge. Brevity helps.

HRM 7600 Module 2 help: mistakes that cost marks

Students often answer a question like this with a general essay on noncompetes instead of a decision for a specific employer in specific states. Another weakness is relying on outdated law, since employment rules change quickly. Our writers can prepare an HRM 7600 decision analysis on the situation you describe. Start by listing every jurisdiction where the employees work and checking current statutes or agency rules for each. Then restate the business problem in a sentence, list options that address it, and compare them in a small table. Choose one, explain the trade-off and set a measure with a date to review it. Keep legal points brief and cited. Then proofread the citations.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More HRM 7600 and Master of Business Administration sample papers

HRM 7600 Module 2 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HRM 7600 Module 2 sample paper?

A full Human Resource Management: Talent Management written assignment on an HR decision in its legal environment appears above: whether a two-state contractor should use noncompete agreements.

Is the FTC noncompete ban in effect?

No. A federal court set the 2024 rule aside before it took effect, and in September 2025 the FTC dismissed its appeals; state laws still govern noncompetes.

Which states ban employee noncompetes?

Several do, including California and Minnesota, which banned new employee noncompetes from July 1, 2023; others, like Wisconsin, allow them only if reasonable.

What is a customer nonsolicitation agreement?

An agreement that bars a departing employee from soliciting the employer's customers for a period without preventing the employee from working in the field.

How does DeNisi and Griffin's text frame HR decisions?

As choices made within legal, economic and organizational constraints, using evidence to compare options against the organization's goals.