| Course | DBA-8100 Qualitative Research Methods and Applications |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Methods paper: interview guide and data collection |
| Length | About 1,003 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Thomas Edison State University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DBA 8100 Module 3
Tell Me About Your First Week as Supervisor: Building an Interview Guide That Opens Doors
Student Name
Doctor of Business Administration, Thomas Edison State University
DBA-8100: Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Mentor Name
Month Day, Year
Tell Me About Your First Week as Supervisor: Building an Interview Guide That Opens Doors
Introduction
In a qualitative interview study, the interview guide is the main instrument alongside the researcher. A poor guide produces short, guarded or leading answers that no analysis can rescue. This paper develops the guide for the supervisor study, explains each design choice, reports a pilot and plans how interviews will be conducted.
A Framework for the Guide
Kallio et al. (2016) systematically reviewed methodological literature on semi-structured interview guides and proposed five phases. First, identify the prerequisites for using semi-structured interviews, confirming that the topic suits open but focused questioning. Second, retrieve and use previous knowledge from literature and experience to understand the topic. Third, formulate a preliminary guide with main themes and follow-up questions. Fourth, pilot test the guide, through internal testing with colleagues, expert assessment or field testing with potential participants. Fifth, present the complete guide in the study's reports so that readers can judge it.
Prerequisites and Prior Knowledge
The study's research question asks how supervisors describe their first year and what shapes decisions to stay or leave, which calls for open questions with room to follow participants' stories. Prior knowledge comes from research on role transitions, which describes the challenge of supervising former peers and the gap between technical skill and people management, and from the firm's exit forms, where pay and schedule were the boxes most often ticked. The guide must go beyond those boxes.
The Interview Relationship
DiCicco-Bloom and Crabtree (2006) described the qualitative interview as a relationship that develops through stages: apprehension at the start, exploration as the participant begins to describe their experience, cooperation as trust builds and, sometimes, participation, when the participant takes an active role in guiding the conversation. They recommended opening with a broad grand tour question that invites description, then using probes to deepen answers, and they stressed recording and transcribing interviews faithfully.
Brinkmann and Kvale (2015) described research interviewing as a craft learned through practice, in which the interviewer's main skill is listening. They distinguished types of questions, including introductory, follow-up, probing, specifying, direct, indirect and interpreting questions, as well as the use of silence to allow a participant to continue. They warned that leading questions can be useful when deliberate but often distort answers when used carelessly.
The Preliminary Guide
The guide has an opening, four main questions and a closing.
Questions avoid the words pay and schedule so as not to steer participants toward the exit form's categories, while leaving room for them to raise those topics.
| Part | Main question | Sample probes |
|---|---|---|
| Opening (grand tour) | Tell me about your first week as a supervisor. | What happened? Who did you talk to? How did it feel? |
| Peers to crew | How did things change with people who used to be your coworkers? | Can you give me an example? What did you do then? |
| Support | Who or what helped you most in that first year, and what was missing? | When did you notice it was missing? What would have helped? |
| The decision | Tell me about a moment when you thought about staying or leaving. | What were you weighing? Who did you talk to? |
| Looking back | If a friend were promoted tomorrow, what would you tell them? | Why that? |
| Closing | What should I have asked you that I didn't? |
Pilot
Following Kallio and colleagues, the guide was field tested with two supervisors from a sister company who are outside the sample. Both found the opening question easy to answer and spoke for several minutes. The peers-to-crew question produced the richest stories. One pilot participant misunderstood the support question as asking only about formal training, so it was reworded to ask about who or what helped. The decision question felt abrupt to one participant, so a transition was added: Many people think about their jobs from time to time. Interviews ran 50 and 65 minutes, confirming a planned length of about an hour.
Conducting the Interviews
Each interview will be held either by video or in a quiet room away from the participant's warehouse, at the participant's choice, outside working hours with travel time compensated. Each will begin with a review of consent and a reminder that the participant can skip any question or stop. A professional service bound by confidentiality will produce exact transcripts of each recording, and I will check every transcript against the audio. I will write brief field notes after each interview recording impressions, nonverbal cues and my own reactions, which will feed the reflexive journal described in module five.
Insider Interviewing
Because I sit in the firm's HR leadership, participants may see me as part of management and edit their answers. At the start of each interview I will explain that I am speaking as a doctoral researcher, that nothing they say will affect their employment and that I will not share identifiable information with their managers. I will avoid defending company practices during interviews, even when participants criticize them.
Video Interviews
Several participants, especially former supervisors who have moved away, are likely to choose video. Video interviews save travel and may feel safer to people who prefer not to visit a company site, but they can make rapport harder and are vulnerable to interruptions at home. I will ask participants to choose a private space, check audio quality at the start and allow extra time for small talk before the first question, which DiCicco-Bloom and Crabtree's stages of rapport suggest is important.
Limits
A guide piloted with two people may still have weaknesses that appear later. Interviews depend on participants' memory of events up to three years ago.
Conclusion
Kallio and colleagues' five phases structured the guide's development, DiCicco-Bloom and Crabtree's account of rapport and probes shaped its questions and Brinkmann and Kvale's emphasis on listening shaped how it will be used. A grand tour opening, four main questions with probes, a pilot that led to two revisions and careful procedures for an insider interviewer prepare the study for data collection.
References
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Reading the DBA 8100 Module 3 assignment instructions
Practical skill in qualitative data collection is part of what TESU's DBA-8100 catalog paragraph promises, and because the syllabus stays within the course, module three is planned as an interview guide paper. Plan to follow a published framework for building the guide, use prior knowledge, write main questions and probes, explain how you avoided leading questions, pilot the guide and report changes and describe how interviews will be conducted, recorded and transcribed, including any insider issues. Some sections ask for a focus group guide instead. Ask whether your mentor wants the guide as an appendix as well as in the text. Plan for video interviews if participants may prefer them, and explain how you will build rapport remotely. Show your full guide in the text or an appendix.
How this DBA 8100 Module 3 example is built
An invented DBA candidate builds the interview guide for her study of newly promoted supervisors. Kallio and colleagues' five phases, prior knowledge from role transition research and exit data and DiCicco-Bloom and Crabtree's and Brinkmann and Kvale's accounts of rapport, question types and listening follow. A guide with a grand tour opening, four main questions and probes appears in a table, then a two-person pilot that led to two revisions, interview procedures, insider safeguards, limits and a conclusion. A section on video interviews, with steps to protect privacy, audio quality and rapport, comes before the limits. Annotations explain the purpose of each probe. Procedures for recording, transcription and field notes are spelled out.
Where the marks sit in the DBA 8100 Module 3 rubric
Interview guide papers earn credit for following a published framework, drawing on prior knowledge, writing open main questions with probes, explaining how leading questions were avoided, piloting the guide and reporting changes, describing recording and transcription and addressing insider dynamics. Mentors notice when a student shows the full guide. Reporting what the pilot changed shows real testing, not a token step. Books should be cited with their edition. Planning for remote interviews and linking the plan to stages of rapport shows readiness for real data collection. Rewording questions after the pilot shows the guide was genuinely tested.
DBA 8100 Module 3 help from the desk
Interview guide papers often list questions without probes or a pilot; include both. Another frequent gap is questions that lead participants toward expected answers. Start with a grand tour question. Write probes for each main question. Pilot with people outside your sample. Report what changed. Explain how you will handle being an insider. Send your research question, and a free first draft follows. Plan for video interviews. Check audio first. Leave time for small talk. Ask participants to choose a private space. Plan how you will close each interview warmly, and remind participants how their words will be protected. Record field notes right after each session.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DBA 8100 and Doctor of Business Administration sample papers
- DBA 8100 Module 1: Qualitative Research Design Paper: Paradigm, Approach and a Capstone Question
- DBA 8100 Module 2: Qualitative Sampling Paper: Purposive Selection, Saturation and Information Power
- DBA 8100 Module 4: Qualitative Analysis Paper: Coding and Reflexive Thematic Analysis
- DBA 8100 Module 5: Trustworthiness and Ethics Paper: Rigor, Member Checking and Insider Research
- DBA 8100 Module 6: Reporting Qualitative Findings Paper: Writing Up to SRQR and COREQ Standards
- DBA 8050 Module 4: Final Project: A Narrative Literature Analysis of Markdown Pricing for Perishable Seasonal Stock
- HRM 8030 Module 2: Written Assignment: Workforce Development for a Changing Skill Mix
- DBA 8070 Module 5: Discussion: A Union Drive in the Finishing Room, Under U.S. and International Labor Law
- DBA 8010 Module 8: Final Project: Two Export Plans, Natural Colors to Germany and Color Lab Services to Mexico
DBA 8100 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DBA 8100 Module 3 sample paper?
The full interview guide paper, with questions, probes and pilot changes for the supervisor study, is reproduced here.
What are Kallio and colleagues' five phases for an interview guide?
Identify prerequisites, use previous knowledge, write a preliminary guide, pilot test it and present the complete guide.
What is a grand tour question?
A broad opening question that invites the participant to describe an experience in their own words.
Why pilot an interview guide?
To find questions that confuse, lead or fall flat before real data collection begins.
How should an insider researcher handle interviews?
Explain their researcher role, protect confidentiality, avoid defending the organization and record reflections after each interview.