APS 4010 Module 1 Written Assignment: A Technologist Leading the Launch of Radioligand Therapy Example

Reviewed by Edgar Pennington, MBA Thomas Edison State University Updated October 2026

This APS 4010 Module 1 example is the first written assignment for APS-4010, Current Trends and Applications in Applied Science and Technology, at TESU, written by a student in the Nuclear Medicine Technology bachelor's program. Module 1, Technology Leadership, asks what a technical leader does when a new technology arrives. The writer is a composite lead nuclear medicine technologist at a community hospital in New Jersey that plans to offer lutetium-177 radioligand therapy. The paper introduces the technology, summarizes the trial evidence behind it and uses hospital research on new technology to define the leadership role a technologist can take. It also sets up the course project, since each assignment builds on the last.

CourseAPS-4010 Current Trends and Applications in Applied Science and Technology
ModuleModule 1
Paper typeWritten Assignment 1: technology leadership
LengthAbout 666 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolThomas Edison State University
ProgramB.S. in Nuclear Medicine Technology
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for APS 4010 Module 1

1

Leading Without the Title: A Lead Technologist's Role in Launching Radioligand Therapy at a Community Hospital

Student Name

B.S. in Nuclear Medicine Technology, Thomas Edison State University

APS-4010: Current Trends and Applications in Applied Science and Technology

Mentor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the leadership a technologist exercises without formal authority, which the paper argues is the heart of technical leadership.
2

Leading Without the Title: A Lead Technologist's Role in Launching Radioligand Therapy at a Community Hospital

Introduction

In most hospitals, new technology is chosen by physicians and administrators, but it succeeds or fails in the hands of the staff who use it every day. Nuclear medicine is about to test that idea. Our community hospital in central New Jersey plans to begin treating patients with lutetium-177 radioligand therapy within a year. As the department's lead technologist, I have no authority to hire or set budgets, yet I will be responsible for much of what makes the program work. This assignment examines that leadership role and introduces the technology this course project will follow.

The Technology

Radioligand therapy pairs a radioactive atom with a molecule that seeks a target on cancer cells. Lutetium-177 emits beta particles that damage nearby cells over a short range and gamma rays that allow imaging. Two products have changed practice. For metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, lutetium-177 attached to a molecule targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) was tested in the VISION trial. Sartor et al. (2021) reported that adding it to standard care improved overall survival, with a median of 15.3 months compared with 11.3 months for standard care alone, and lengthened the time before the disease progressed on imaging. For certain neuroendocrine tumors, lutetium-177 dotatate improved progression-free survival in the NETTER-1 trial (Strosberg et al., 2017). Both treatments are now approved in the United States, and patients are selected with PET imaging that shows whether their tumors carry the target.

What a Technical Leader Needs

A technical leader needs three kinds of knowledge. The first is technical: radiopharmaceutical handling, dose verification, imaging after treatment and radiation safety. The second is procedural: how a new treatment moves from order to administration to patient release, and where errors can occur. The third is relational: how to bring together oncologists, radiation safety staff, nurses, pharmacy and schedulers who have never worked on a therapy like this together.

Leading Team Learning

Edmondson et al. (2001) studied hospitals adopting a new form of minimally invasive cardiac surgery and found that success depended less on the surgeons' skill or the hospital's resources than on how teams learned together. In the successful hospitals, leaders treated the new procedure as something the whole team had to learn together, picked team members on purpose, held practice sessions and made it safe to speak up about problems. Where teams handled it as just another routine bolted onto old ones, they struggled.

That finding fits a technologist's position. I cannot assign people to the therapy team, but I can propose who should be on it, organize dry runs before the first patient and set the tone that anyone may stop a procedure if something looks wrong. I can also frame the therapy as new work for everyone, since radioligand therapy changes routines in every department it touches.

What this page is doingApplying a study of surgical teams to a nuclear medicine therapy shows that the leadership lesson transfers across technologies, which is the point of a technology leadership module.
3

Specific Leadership Tasks

AreaTask the lead technologist can lead
ProtocolsDraft step-by-step procedures for receiving, verifying and administering doses
Radiation safetyWork with the radiation safety officer on room preparation, monitoring and patient release instructions
TrainingOrganize dry runs with nurses, technologists and pharmacy before the first patient
CommunicationPrepare plain-language instructions for patients and families
QualityTrack each treatment's timing, doses and any problems to improve the process

The Course Project

Each written assignment in this course builds on the previous one, and the four together become the final project. This first part defines the technology and my leadership role. The next will examine the technology's impact on patients, staff and the department, the third will look at it from different stakeholders' perspectives and the last will place it within the trends shaping nuclear medicine.

Conclusion

Technical leadership in health care often belongs to people without formal authority. For radioligand therapy at our hospital, the lead technologist's job is to turn trial evidence into a safe, practiced routine by leading the team's learning, the protocols and the communication that make a new technology work.

References

Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685-716. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094828

Sartor, O., de Bono, J., Chi, K. N., Fizazi, K., Herrmann, K., Rahbar, K., Tagawa, S. T., Nordquist, L. T., Vaishampayan, N., El-Haddad, G., Park, C. H., Beer, T. M., Armour, A., Pérez-Contreras, W. J., DeSilvio, M., Kpamegan, E., Gericke, G., Messmann, R. A., Morris, M. J., & Krause, B. J. (2021). Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 385(12), 1091-1103. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107322

Strosberg, J., El-Haddad, G., Wolin, E., Hendifar, A., Yao, J., Chasen, B., Mittra, E., Kunz, P. L., Kulke, M. H., Jacene, H., Bushnell, D., O'Dorisio, T. M., Baum, R. P., Kulkarni, H. R., Caplin, M., Lebtahi, R., Hobday, T., Delpassand, E., Van Cutsem, E., ... Krenning, E. (2017). Phase 3 trial of 177Lu-dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607427

Reading the APS 4010 Module 1 assignment instructions

APS-4010 has no required textbook; readings are web links in each module plus journal articles you find through the TESU library databases. The grade comes from eight online discussions worth 40 percent, four written assignments worth 44 percent, a final project worth 14 percent and an e-proficiency profile worth 2 percent. Each written assignment builds on the previous ones, and the final project combines all four into one document revised with your mentor's instructions. Module 1, Technology Leadership, asks you to choose a technology in your science and technology area and examine the knowledge and skills a technical leader needs to bring it into use. Choose a technology you can follow through all four modules.

How this APS 4010 Module 1 example is built

The sample opens with the gap between who chooses a technology and who makes it work. A section explains radioligand therapy and summarizes the VISION and NETTER-1 trials with their main results. Three kinds of knowledge a technical leader needs follow. Edmondson, Bohmer and Pisano's hospital study frames leadership as leading team learning, with a margin note on why a surgical study applies here. A five-row table lists tasks a lead technologist can lead without formal authority. A short section maps the four-part course project, and the conclusion defines technical leadership for this setting. The paper names the next three parts of the project at the end, so the mentor can see how the course work will connect.

Reading the APS 4010 Module 1 grading rubric

Mentors grade written assignments on accurate content, clear analysis, use of credible sources and how well the paper sets up later parts of the project. A strong paper chooses a specific technology, describes it correctly with evidence and defines technical leadership in a way that applies to the student's own role. Using research on how organizations adopt technology, rather than only describing the device or treatment, shows the leadership focus the module asks for. Since the papers build into the final project, a clear structure and a stated plan for the next parts help. APA citations and careful writing complete the work. Clinical facts reported with the trial's own figures, rather than general claims of benefit, show the care expected in a health science field.

Common APS 4010 Module 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them

First assignments often describe a technology in detail and say little about leadership, or discuss leadership in general without a technology. Others choose a technology too broad to follow, such as "artificial intelligence in health care." Pick one specific technology from your field, explain it accurately with a research source, then show what a technical leader would do to bring it into use. Name concrete tasks. State how the next three assignments will build on this one. Check clinical figures against the original study. The desk writes a first APS-4010 leadership draft on your own technology at no cost. Keep the technology description short enough that most of the paper discusses leadership, which is the module's focus.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Thomas Edison State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More APS 4010 and B.S. in Nuclear Medicine Technology sample papers

APS 4010 Module 1 questions, answered

Where can I find a free APS 4010 Module 1 sample paper?

The written assignment above examines a lead technologist's role in launching lutetium-177 radioligand therapy at a community hospital.

What is radioligand therapy?

A treatment that links a radioactive atom, such as lutetium-177, to a molecule that seeks a target on cancer cells, delivering radiation directly to the tumor.

What did the VISION trial show?

Adding lutetium-177-PSMA-617 to standard care improved overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, with a median of 15.3 versus 11.3 months.

How is APS-4010 graded?

Discussions 40 percent, four written assignments 44 percent, the final project 14 percent and an e-proficiency profile 2 percent.

Does APS-4010 have a textbook?

No; readings are linked in each module, and students search journal articles through the library databases for the project.